Literature DB >> 28568564

Long-term clinical results of bioresorbable absorb scaffolds using the PSP-technique in patients with and without diabetes.

Sinisa Markovic1, Christine Kugler1, Wolfgang Rottbauer1, Jochen Wöhrle1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated clinical results up to 36 months after implantation of Absorb BVS using PSP-technique and compared the outcome of patients with and without diabetes mellitus.
BACKGROUND: Absorb II demonstrated that interventional treatment of coronary artery disease with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) without proper PSP-technique (pre-dilation, proper sizing, and post-dilation) is associated with an increased thrombotic risk, even in simple lesions.
METHODS: In this prospective study 319 patients with 420 lesions were enrolled and treated with the Absorb BVS. Pre-dilation was mandatory and post-dilation with a high-pressure balloon was performed in patients with a scaffold length >12 mm. Patients were clinically followed up to 3 years. Primary outcome measure was the device-oriented endpoint (DoCE) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly related to a non-target vessel and target lesion revascularization.
RESULTS: DoCE was 5.0%, 7.1%, and 10.0% after 12, 24, and 36 months for the total population. Rate of scaffold thrombosis was 0.5%, 0.8%, and 1.4% after 12, 24, and 36 months. Rate of DoCE was higher in the diabetic subgroup with 9.1%, 12.6%, and 12.9% after 12, 24, and 36 months compared with 4.0% (P = 0.13), 5.6% (P = 0.05), and 9.9% (P = 0.20) in patients without diabetes mellitus.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the Absorb BVS using the PSP-technique show good results up to 3 years with a low rate of scaffold thrombosis. Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus have an increased rate of DoCE compared with non-diabetic patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov_NCT02162056.
© 2017, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  absorb scaffold; diabetic mellitus; follow-up

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28568564     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  3 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Authors:  Mateusz P Jeżewski; Michał J Kubisa; Ceren Eyileten; Salvatore De Rosa; Günter Christ; Maciej Lesiak; Ciro Indolfi; Aurel Toma; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Marek Postuła
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Mid-term outcomes of the Absorb BVS versus second-generation DES: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cordula M Felix; Victor J van den Berg; Sanne E Hoeks; Jiang Ming Fam; Mattie Lenzen; Eric Boersma; Peter C Smits; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma; Robert Jan M van Geuns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds.

Authors:  Remzi Anadol; Katharina Schnitzler; Liv Lorenz; Melissa Weissner; Helen Ullrich; Alberto Polimeni; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.