Literature DB >> 28568559

THE MAINTENANCE OF SEX BY GROUP SELECTION.

Leonard Nunney1.   

Abstract

The traditional group-selection model for the maintenance of sex is based upon the assumption that the long-term evolutionary benefits of sexual reproduction result in asexual lineages having a higher extinction rate than sexual species. This model is reexamined, as is a related model that incorporates the possibility that sexual and asexual lines differ in their speciation rates. In these models, the long-term advantage of sex is opposed by a strong short-term disadvantage arising from the twofold reproductive cost of producing males. It is shown that once some sexual lines become established, then group selection can act to maintain sex despite its short-term disadvantage. The short-term disadvantage is included in the model by assuming that, if asexual individuals arise by mutation within a previously completely sexual species, then the asexuals quickly displace their sexual conspecifics and the species is transformed to asexuality. The probability of this event is given by the transition rate, us . If the value of us varies between lineages, then one of the effects of group selection is to favor groups (i.e., species) with the lowest values of us . This occurs because lines that do convert to asexuality (because of a high us ) are doomed to a high rate of extinction, and in the long term only those that do not convert to asexuality (because of a low us ) survive. The net result of group selection is that sex is maintained because of its lower extinction rate (or higher speciation rate) and because asexual mutants only rarely arise. © 1989 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Year:  1989        PMID: 28568559     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Multilevel selection, cooperation, and altruism : Reflections on unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior.

Authors:  B Smuts
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1999-09

2.  Testing Weissman's Lineage Selection Model for the Maintenance of Sex: The Evolutionary Dynamics of Clam Shrimp Reproduction over Geologic Time.

Authors:  Timothy I Astrop; Lisa Park Boush; Stephen C Weeks
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Variability in fitness effects can preclude selection of the fittest.

Authors:  Christopher J Graves; Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 13.915

4.  Genetic Variation in Reproductive Investment Across an Ephemerality Gradient in Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Karen B Barnard-Kubow; Dörthe Becker; Connor S Murray; Robert Porter; Grace Gutierrez; Priscilla Erickson; Joaquin C B Nunez; Erin Voss; Kushal Suryamohan; Aakrosh Ratan; Andrew Beckerman; Alan O Bergland
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 8.800

5.  Lineage Selection and the Maintenance of Sex.

Authors:  Damien M de Vienne; Tatiana Giraud; Pierre-Henri Gouyon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Establishment of facultative sexuals.

Authors:  Chris J Paley; Sergei N Taraskin; Stephen R Elliott
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-01-25

7.  Assortative mating and self-fertilization differ in their contributions to reinforcement, cascade speciation, and diversification.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Amanda K Gibson; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Sex is always well worth its two-fold cost.

Authors:  Alexander Feigel; Avraham Englander; Assaf Engel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Alteration of sexual reproduction and genetic diversity in the kelp species Laminaria digitata at the southern limit of its range.

Authors:  Luz Valeria Oppliger; Peter von Dassow; Sarah Bouchemousse; Marine Robuchon; Myriam Valero; Juan A Correa; Stéphane Mauger; Christophe Destombe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  General environmental heterogeneity as the explanation of sexuality? Comparative study shows that ancient asexual taxa are associated with both biotically and abiotically homogeneous environments.

Authors:  Jan Toman; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.