Literature DB >> 28568534

EVOLUTION OF BASAL METABOLIC RATE AND ORGAN MASSES IN LABORATORY MICE.

Marek Konarzewski1, Jared Diamond1.   

Abstract

Animal species of similar body mass vary widely in basal metabolic rate (BMR). A central problem of evolutionary physiology concerns the anatomical/physiological origin and functional significance of that variation. It has been hypothesized that such interspecific differences in wild animals evolved adaptively from differences in relative sizes of metabolically active organs. In order to minimize confounding phenotypic effects and maximize relevant genetic variation, we tested for intraspecific correlations between body-mass-corrected BMR and masses of four organs (heart, kidney, liver, and small intestine) among six inbred strains of mice. We found significant differences between strains in BMR and in masses of all four organs. Strains with exceptionally high (or low) BMR tended to have disproportionately large (or small) organs. The mass of each organ was correlated with the masses of each of the other three organs. Variation in organ masses accounted for 52% of the observed variation in BMR, of which 42% represented between-strain variation, and 10% represented within-strain variation. This conclusion is supported by published measurements of metabolic rates of tissue slices from the four organs. The correlation between BMR and intestine or heart mass arose exclusively from differences between strains, while the correlation between BMR and liver or kidney mass also appeared in comparing individual mice within the same strain. Thus, even though the masses of the four examined organs account for no more than 17% of total body mass, their high metabolic activities or correlated factors account for much of the variation in BMR among mice. We suggest that large masses of metabolically active organs are subject to natural selection through evolutionary trade-offs. On the one hand, they make possible high-energy budgets (advantageous under some conditions), but on the other hand they are energetically expensive to maintain. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial selection; basal metabolic rate; energetics; energy budget; evolutionary trade-offs; heart; inbred mouse strains; intestine; kidney; liver; organ masses

Year:  1995        PMID: 28568534     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb04450.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  32 in total

1.  Is BMR repeatable in deer mice? Organ mass correlates and the effects of cold acclimation and natal altitude.

Authors:  G A Russell; M A Chappell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Expanding the body mass range: associations between BMR and tissue morphology in wild type and mutant dwarf mice (David mice).

Authors:  Carola W Meyer; Juliane Neubronner; Jan Rozman; Gabi Stumm; Andreas Osanger; Claudia Stoeger; Martin Augustin; Johannes Grosse; Martin Klingenspor; Gerhard Heldmaier
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Physiological flexibility in the Andean lizard Liolaemus bellii: seasonal changes in energy acquisition, storage and expenditure.

Authors:  Daniel E Naya; Claudio Veloso; Francisco Bozinovic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Analysis of the effects of inbreeding on lifespan and starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Terhi M Valtonen; Derek A Roff; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 5.  How low can you go? An adaptive energetic framework for interpreting basal metabolic rate variation in endotherms.

Authors:  David L Swanson; Andrew E McKechnie; François Vézina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 6.  Determinants of inter-specific variation in basal metabolic rate.

Authors:  Craig R White; Michael R Kearney
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 7.  Influence of hormonal status on substrate utilization at rest and during exercise in the female population.

Authors:  Laurie Isacco; Pascale Duché; Nathalie Boisseau
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  A guide to analysis of mouse energy metabolism.

Authors:  Matthias H Tschöp; John R Speakman; Jonathan R S Arch; Johan Auwerx; Jens C Brüning; Lawrence Chan; Robert H Eckel; Robert V Farese; Jose E Galgani; Catherine Hambly; Mark A Herman; Tamas L Horvath; Barbara B Kahn; Sara C Kozma; Eleftheria Maratos-Flier; Timo D Müller; Heike Münzberg; Paul T Pfluger; Leona Plum; Marc L Reitman; Kamal Rahmouni; Gerald I Shulman; George Thomas; C Ronald Kahn; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Flexibility is the key: metabolic and thermoregulatory behaviour in a small endotherm.

Authors:  Franz Langer; Nadine Havenstein; Joanna Fietz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Consequences of Fatherhood in the Biparental California Mouse (Peromyscus californicus): Locomotor Performance, Metabolic Rate, and Organ Masses.

Authors:  Jacob R Andrew; Wendy Saltzman; Mark A Chappell; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.