Literature DB >> 28568146

INTERACTION-INDEPENDENT SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE MECHANISMS OF SEXUAL SELECTION.

Christopher G Murphy1.   

Abstract

Darwin identified explicitly two types of sexual selection, male contests (combat and displays) and female choice, and he devoted the overwhelming majority of his examples to traits that influence the outcome of these interactions. Subsequent treatments of sexual selection have emphasized the importance of intra- and intersexual interactions as sources of sexual selection. However, many traits that are important determinants of mating success influence mating success without necessarily affecting the outcome of intra- and intersexual interactions. Here, I argue that traits can be subject to sexual selection even if they do not affect the outcome of intra- and intersexual interactions. I distinguish two types of sexual selection, interaction-independent and interaction-dependent selection, based on whether variance in mating success is the result of trait-dependent outcomes of interactions between conspecifics. I then use this distinction to construct a framework for classifying types of sexual selection that unifies and expands previously proposed frameworks. Finally, I outline several implications that the concept of interaction-independent sexual selection has for the general theory of sexual selection. © 1998 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Interaction-dependent sexual selection; interaction-independent sexual selection; intersexual competition; mate choice; sexual selection

Year:  1998        PMID: 28568146     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05133.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

Review 1.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Activity predicts male reproductive success in a polygynous lizard.

Authors:  J Scott Keogh; Daniel W A Noble; Eleanor E Wilson; Martin J Whiting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Sexual conflict in plants.

Authors:  N G Prasad; S Bedhomme
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.508

4.  Do metrics of sexual selection conform to Bateman's principles in a wind-pollinated plant?

Authors:  Jeanne Tonnabel; Patrice David; John R Pannell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Phenology and Floral Biology of Diospyros sericea A. DC. (Ebenaceae): Inconstant Males May Be behind an Enigma of Dioecy.

Authors:  Bárbara Ramaldes; Renata Santos; André Rodrigo Rech; Michellia Soares
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.