Literature DB >> 28568007

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?

William R Rice1, Ellen E Hostert1.   

Abstract

We integrate experimental studies attempting to duplicate all or part of the speciation process under controlled laboratory conditions and ask what general conclusions can be made concerning the major models of speciation. Strong support is found for the evolution of reproductive isolation via pleiotropy and/or genetic hitchhiking with or without allopatry. Little or no support is found for the bottleneck and reinforcement models of speciation. We conclude that the role of geographical separation in generating allopatry (i.e., zero gene flow induced by spatial isolation) has been overemphasized in the past, whereas its role in generating diminished gene flow in combination with strong, discontinuous, and multifarious divergent selection, has been largely unappreciated. © 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Allopatric speciation; genetic revolutions; nonallopatric speciation; population bottleneck; postzygotic isolation; prezygotic isolation; reinforcement; reproductive isolation; speciation

Year:  1993        PMID: 28568007     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  53 in total

1.  Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Andrew P Michel; Sheina Sim; Thomas H Q Powell; Michael S Taylor; Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Alex Widmer; A Michele Arntz; John M Burke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The existence of species rests on a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding. An essay on the close relationship between speciation, inbreeding and recessive mutations.

Authors:  Etienne Joly
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Conditions for mutation-order speciation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Samuel M Flaxman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The convoluted evolution of snail chirality.

Authors:  M Schilthuizen; A Davison
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-11

6.  Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments.

Authors:  Timothy H Vines; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Hybridization in human evolution: Insights from other organisms.

Authors:  Rebecca R Ackermann; Michael L Arnold; Marcella D Baiz; James A Cahill; Liliana Cortés-Ortiz; Ben J Evans; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Robyn A Humphreys; Clifford J Jolly; Joanna Malukiewicz; Christopher J Percival; Terrence B Ritzman; Christian Roos; Charles C Roseman; Lauren Schroeder; Fred H Smith; Kerryn A Warren; Robert K Wayne; Dietmar Zinner
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2019-06-20

8.  On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Jeremy R Lipkowitz; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Fine-scale geographic patterns of gene flow and reproductive character displacement in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Emily R Bewick; Brooke E White; Michael J Bray; Devon P Humphreys
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  The divergence of chimpanzee species and subspecies as revealed in multipopulation isolation-with-migration analyses.

Authors:  Jody Hey
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.