Literature DB >> 28567912

A LIFE-HISTORY BASED STUDY OF POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE: SEED BANK TO ADULTS IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA.

Stephen J Tonsor1,2, Susan Kalisz1,2, Jill Fisher1,2, Timothy P Holtsford1.   

Abstract

We explored the extent to which the soil seed bank differed genetically and spatially in comparison to two actively growing stages in a natural population of Plantago lanceolata. All seed-bank seeds, seedlings, and adults of P. lanceolata within eight subunits in a larger population were mapped, subjected to starch gel electrophoresis, and allozyme analysis in 1988. Gel electrophoresis was also used to estimate the mating system in two years, 1986 and 1988. The spatial distributions of seeds, seedlings, and adults were highly coincident. Allele frequencies of the dormant seeds differed significantly from those of the adults for four of the five polymorphic loci. In addition, a comparison of the genotype frequencies of the three life-history stages indicated that the seed bank had an excess of homozygotes. Homozygosity, relative to Hardy-Weinberg expectations, decreased during the life cycle (for seed bank, seedlings, and adults respectively: Fit = 0.19, 0.09, 0.01; Fis = 0.14, 0.04, -0.12). Spatial genetic differentiation increased sixfold during the life cycle: (for seed bank, seedling and adults: Fs1 ∗∗∗ = 0.02, 0.05, 0.12). The apparent selfing rate was 0.01 in 1986 and 0.09 in 1988. These selfing rates are not large enough to account for the elevated homozygosity of the seed bank. Inbreeding depression, overdominance for fitness, and a "temporal Wahlund's effect" are discussed as possible mechanisms that could generate high homozygosity in the seed bank, relative to later life-history stages. In Plantago lanceolata, the influence of the mating system and the "genetic memory" of the seed bank are obscured by the time plants reach the reproductive stage. © 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demographic genetics mating system; Plantaginaceae; Plantago lanceolata; Wright's F-statistics; population genetic structure; seed bank

Year:  1993        PMID: 28567912     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Genetic change following fire in populations of a seed-banking perennial plant.

Authors:  Rebecca W Dolan; Pedro F Quintana-Ascencio; Eric S Menges
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Depth as an organizing force in Pocillopora damicornis: intra-reef genetic architecture.

Authors:  Kelvin D Gorospe; Stephen A Karl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Differential role of a persistent seed bank for genetic variation in early vs. late successional stages.

Authors:  Benjamin Schulz; Walter Durka; Jiří Danihelka; Rolf Lutz Eckstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fluctuating selection on migrant adaptive sodium transporter alleles in coastal Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Silvia Busoms; Pirita Paajanen; Sarah Marburger; Sian Bray; Xin-Yuan Huang; Charlotte Poschenrieder; Levi Yant; David E Salt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Anthropogenic fragmentation increases risk of genetic decline in the threatened orchid Platanthera leucophaea.

Authors:  Claire Ellwanger; Laura Steger; Cathy Pollack; Rachel Wells; Jeremie Benjamin Fant
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Can soil seed banks serve as genetic memory? A study of three species with contrasting life history strategies.

Authors:  Bohumil Mandák; Petr Zákravský; Václav Mahelka; Ivana Plačková
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A century of genetic variation inferred from a persistent soil-stored seed bank.

Authors:  Jennifer L Summers; Brittany Bernik; Colin J Saunders; Jason S McLachlan; Michael J Blum
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 5.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.