| Literature DB >> 28567912 |
Stephen J Tonsor1,2, Susan Kalisz1,2, Jill Fisher1,2, Timothy P Holtsford1.
Abstract
We explored the extent to which the soil seed bank differed genetically and spatially in comparison to two actively growing stages in a natural population of Plantago lanceolata. All seed-bank seeds, seedlings, and adults of P. lanceolata within eight subunits in a larger population were mapped, subjected to starch gel electrophoresis, and allozyme analysis in 1988. Gel electrophoresis was also used to estimate the mating system in two years, 1986 and 1988. The spatial distributions of seeds, seedlings, and adults were highly coincident. Allele frequencies of the dormant seeds differed significantly from those of the adults for four of the five polymorphic loci. In addition, a comparison of the genotype frequencies of the three life-history stages indicated that the seed bank had an excess of homozygotes. Homozygosity, relative to Hardy-Weinberg expectations, decreased during the life cycle (for seed bank, seedlings, and adults respectively: Fit = 0.19, 0.09, 0.01; Fis = 0.14, 0.04, -0.12). Spatial genetic differentiation increased sixfold during the life cycle: (for seed bank, seedling and adults: Fs1 ∗∗∗ = 0.02, 0.05, 0.12). The apparent selfing rate was 0.01 in 1986 and 0.09 in 1988. These selfing rates are not large enough to account for the elevated homozygosity of the seed bank. Inbreeding depression, overdominance for fitness, and a "temporal Wahlund's effect" are discussed as possible mechanisms that could generate high homozygosity in the seed bank, relative to later life-history stages. In Plantago lanceolata, the influence of the mating system and the "genetic memory" of the seed bank are obscured by the time plants reach the reproductive stage. © 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.Entities:
Keywords: Demographic genetics mating system; Plantaginaceae; Plantago lanceolata; Wright's F-statistics; population genetic structure; seed bank
Year: 1993 PMID: 28567912 DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01237.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evolution ISSN: 0014-3820 Impact factor: 3.694