Literature DB >> 28567800

WHY SHOULD LEK-BREEDERS BE MONOMORPHIC?

Pepper W Trail1.   

Abstract

Approximately one-quarter of all lek-breeding bird species are sexually monomorphic. Understanding the significance, if any, of this exception to the usual correlation between sexual selection and dimorphism requires detailed data on the mating systems of both monomorphic and dimorphic species. The capuchinbird (Perissocephalus tricolor) is a sexually monomorphic, lek-breeding member of the cotinga family. I studied the social and sexual behavior of this species, and compared it with the Guianan cock-of-the-rock (Rupicola rupicola), a dimorphic, lekking member of the same family. Male-male competition in capuchinbirds involved direct contests for dominance, rather than territorial displays as in classic lek species. In each year, one dominant individual was able to control the most desired display site on the 8-male lek, and was the only male that copulated. In contrast to dimorphic lek birds, female as well as male capuchinbirds engaged in frequent and intense aggression at the lek, and both males and females engaged in sexual mimicry. I suggest that plumage monomorphism in lek birds has evolved as a result of social competition affecting both sexes. This hypothesis accounts for the exaggerated plumage characters shared by males and females in capuchinbirds and a number of other monomorphic lek birds. The evolution of plumage can best be analyzed as an arms race, in which the balance of selective forces acting on each sex can produce a variety of equilibrium states, ranging from sexual indistinguishability to extreme dimorphism. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28567800     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05254.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Intersexual social dominance mimicry drives female hummingbird polymorphism.

Authors:  Jay J Falk; Dustin R Rubenstein; Alejandro Rico-Guevara; Michael S Webster
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  The Evolution of Derived Monomorphism From Sexual Dimorphism: A Case Study on Salamanders.

Authors:  Nancy L Staub
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-12-21

3.  Fitness costs of female choosiness are low in a socially monogamous songbird.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Daiping Wang; Katrin Martin; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Anal fin pigmentation in Brachyrhaphis fishes is not used for sexual mimicry.

Authors:  Kandace M Flanary; Jerald B Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.