| Literature DB >> 28567780 |
Diane R Campbell1,2, Nickolas M Waser3,2, Mary V Price3,2.
Abstract
Experimental manipulation of a trait can be used to distinguish direct selection from selection of correlated traits and to identify mechanisms of selection. Here we use experiments to investigate phenotypic selection of stigma position in angiosperm flowers. In natural populations of the subalpine herb Ipomopsis aggregata, plants with more strongly exserted stigmas receive more pollen per flower, indicating selection favoring stigma exsertion during the pollination stage of the life cycle. We pose four hypotheses for this association, two involving direct selection on stigma position and two involving indirect selection of a correlated floral trait. The first three hypotheses were tested using hand pollinations that mimicked natural hummingbird visitation, and by presenting captive hummingbirds with a series of flowers that differed in stigma and anther positions, sex ratio, and presence of anthers. In these experiments, pollen deposition either was independent of stigma exsertion or was highest on inserted stigmas, suggesting direct selection against exserted stigmas. In natural populations, however, stigma exsertion is highly correlated with time spent by the protandrous flowers in the pistillate phase. When we manipulated the latter trait in the field, pollen deposition increased with duration of exposure to hummingbirds, indicating indirect selection for stigma exsertion. Stigma exsertion and time spent in the pistillate phase are genetically and phenotypically correlated, as shown by a quantitative genetic experiment conducted in the field with paternal half sibships. Our results suggest that the evolution of stigma position can be driven by selection of a genetically correlated trait. © 1994 The Society for the Study of Evolution.Entities:
Keywords: Experimental manipulation; floral gender expression; floral morphology; genetic correlation; heritability; hummingbird pollination; mechanism of selection; pollen receipt; sex allocation
Year: 1994 PMID: 28567780 DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01294.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evolution ISSN: 0014-3820 Impact factor: 3.694