Carrie Cuttler1,2, Alexander Spradlin3, Amy T Nusbaum3, Paul Whitney3, John M Hinson3, Ryan J McLaughlin3,4,5. 1. Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA. carrie.cuttler@wsu.edu. 2. Translational Addiction Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. carrie.cuttler@wsu.edu. 3. Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA. 4. Translational Addiction Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. 5. Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-7620, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: One of the most commonly cited reasons for chronic cannabis use is to cope with stress. Consistent with this, cannabis users have shown reduced emotional arousal and dampened stress reactivity in response to negative imagery. OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge, the present study represents the first to examine the effects of an acute stress manipulation on subjective stress and salivary cortisol in chronic cannabis users compared to non-users. METHODS:Forty cannabis users and 42 non-users were randomly assigned to complete either the stress or no stress conditions of the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST). The stress condition of the MAST manipulates both physiological (placing hand in ice bath) and psychosocial stress (performing math under conditions of social evaluation). Participants gave baseline subjective stress ratings before, during, and after the stress manipulation. Cortisol was measured from saliva samples obtained before and after the stress manipulation. Further, cannabis cravings and symptoms of withdrawal were measured. RESULTS:Subjective stress ratings and cortisol levels were significantly higher in non-users in the stress condition relative to non-users in the no stress condition. In contrast, cannabis users demonstrated blunted stress reactivity; specifically, they showed no increase in cortisol and a significantly smaller increase in subjective stress ratings. The stress manipulation had no impact on cannabis users' self-reported cravings or withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Chronic cannabis use is associated with blunted stress reactivity. Future research is needed to determine whether this helps to confer resiliency or vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology as well as the mechanisms underlying this effect.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: One of the most commonly cited reasons for chronic cannabis use is to cope with stress. Consistent with this, cannabis users have shown reduced emotional arousal and dampened stress reactivity in response to negative imagery. OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge, the present study represents the first to examine the effects of an acute stress manipulation on subjective stress and salivary cortisol in chronic cannabis users compared to non-users. METHODS: Forty cannabis users and 42 non-users were randomly assigned to complete either the stress or no stress conditions of the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST). The stress condition of the MAST manipulates both physiological (placing hand in ice bath) and psychosocial stress (performing math under conditions of social evaluation). Participants gave baseline subjective stress ratings before, during, and after the stress manipulation. Cortisol was measured from saliva samples obtained before and after the stress manipulation. Further, cannabis cravings and symptoms of withdrawal were measured. RESULTS: Subjective stress ratings and cortisol levels were significantly higher in non-users in the stress condition relative to non-users in the no stress condition. In contrast, cannabis users demonstrated blunted stress reactivity; specifically, they showed no increase in cortisol and a significantly smaller increase in subjective stress ratings. The stress manipulation had no impact on cannabis users' self-reported cravings or withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Chronic cannabis use is associated with blunted stress reactivity. Future research is needed to determine whether this helps to confer resiliency or vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology as well as the mechanisms underlying this effect.
Authors: Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Joanna S Fowler; David Alexoff; Jean Logan; Millard Jayne; Christopher Wong; Dardo Tomasi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Richard J Macatee; Sarah A Okey; Brian J Albanese; Norman B Schmidt; Jesse R Cougle Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Julia D Buckner; Paige E Morris; Cristina N Abarno; Nina I Glover; Elizabeth M Lewis Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 5.285