Literature DB >> 28567561

Measuring healthcare expenditure: different methods, different results.

C Keegan1, S Connolly2, M-A Wren2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate information on healthcare expenditure is essential; however, a number of issues arise when healthcare expenditure is being measured. Traditionally healthcare expenditure data in Ireland have been limited, especially data that facilitate comparable analysis through time and across particular programmes or services. Recently however, a major development in Irish healthcare expenditure estimates was the publication of Irish healthcare current expenditure estimates for 2013 according to the international standard of the OECD System of Health Accounts (SHA). AIMS: The aim of the analysis presented in this paper is to examine how alternative methodologies for measuring healthcare can influence the estimate(s) of healthcare expenditure.
METHODS: The methods and results (in terms of healthcare expenditure) of the Central Statistics Office (CSO) application of SHA methodology will be compared and contrasted with an alternative methodology for measuring healthcare expenditure developed by Wren et al. [1].
RESULTS: The two approaches to measuring healthcare expenditure in Ireland reached a very similar figure for total current healthcare expenditure in 2013. However, there were considerable disparities in the components of expenditure.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no one absolute definition or estimate of healthcare expenditure, and different methodological approaches to estimating expenditure will likely yield different results. Therefore, care is required when assessing healthcare expenditure to ensure that there is a clear understanding about what is and is not included in the estimate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare expenditure comparison; Irish healthcare system; Public and private healthcare; System of health accounts

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28567561     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-017-1623-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  5 in total

1.  Limitations of methods for measuring out-of-pocket and catastrophic private health expenditures.

Authors:  Chunling Lu; Brian Chin; Guohong Li; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  The new system of health accounts in Ireland: what does it all mean?

Authors:  B Turner
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Improved estimates of Belgian private health expenditure can give important lessons to other OECD countries.

Authors:  Piet Calcoen; Dirk Moens; Pieter Verlinden; Wynand P M M van de Ven; Jozef Pacolet
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: a study of the recall period length in health care survey questions.

Authors:  Gustav Kjellsson; Philip Clarke; Ulf-G Gerdtham
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Measuring health care costs of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance in the U.S.: A comparison of survey and claims data.

Authors:  Ana Aizcorbe; Eli Liebman; Sarah Pack; David M Cutler; Michael E Chernew; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  Stat J IAOS       Date:  2012
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.