| Literature DB >> 28567020 |
Inmaculada Varó1, Gabriel Cardenete2, Francisco Hontoria1, Óscar Monroig1,3, José Iglesias4, Juan J Otero4, Eduardo Almansa5, Juan C Navarro1.
Abstract
Nowadays, the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) culture is hampered by massive mortalities occurring during early life-cycle stages (paralarvae). Despite the causes of the high paralarvae mortality are not yet well-defined and understood, the nutritional stress caused by inadequate diets is pointed out as one of the main factors. In this study, the effects of diet on paralarvae is analyzed through a proteomic approach, to search for novel biomarkers of nutritional stress. A total of 43 proteins showing differential expression in the different conditions studied have been identified. The analysis highlights proteins related with the carbohydrate metabolism: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dedydrogenase (GAPDH), triosephosphate isomerase; other ways of energetic metabolism: NADP+-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase, arginine kinase; detoxification: glutathione-S-transferase (GST); stress: heat shock proteins (HSP70); structural constituent of eye lens: S-crystallin 3; and cytoskeleton: actin, actin-beta/gamma1, beta actin. These results allow defining characteristic proteomes of paralarvae depending on the diet; as well as the use of several of these proteins as novel biomarkers to evaluate their welfare linked to nutritional stress. Notably, the changes of proteins like S-crystallin 3, arginine kinase and NAD+ specific isocitrate dehydrogenase, may be related to fed vs. starving paralarvae, particularly in the first 4 days of development.Entities:
Keywords: Octopus vulgaris; novel biomarkers; nutritional stress; paralarvae; proteome; welfare
Year: 2017 PMID: 28567020 PMCID: PMC5434110 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Representative two-dimensional differential in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) of . Gel was scanned to obtain single images corresponding to: (A) (Cy2, blue), (B) (Cy3, green), (C) (Cy5, red) labelled samples, and (D) (overlay gel image of the three dyes). Details in section 2D Differential in Gel Electrophoresis (2D-DIGE): Sample Preparation and Protein Labeling.
Protein identities differentially expressed in .
| Up-regulated | 2,535 | 0.0042 | 2.06 | – | – | – | |
| 2,619 | 0.0190 | 2.01 | – | – | – | ||
| 2,668 | 0.0034 | 1.94 | S-crystallin 3 | Structural constituent of eye lens | |||
| 2,711 | 0.0250 | 1.83 | – | – | – | ||
| 1,802 | 0.0290 | 1.71 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Carbohydrate metabolism | |||
| 2,135 | 0.0074 | 1.60 | – | – | – | ||
| 1,229 | 0.0360 | 1.35 | Beta actin | ATP-binding | |||
| Down-regulated | 912 | 0.0064 | −1.20 | Predicted protein | – | ||
| 2,803 | 0.0170 | −1.23 | – | – | – | ||
| 1,601 | 0.0003 | −1.32 | – | – | – | ||
| 2,438 | 0.0110 | −1.97 | – | – | – | ||
| 596 | 0.0091 | −2.08 | Heat shock protein 70 kDa | Response to stress | |||
| 1,645 | 0.0068 | −2.20 | – | – | – | ||
| 2,600 | 0.0030 | −2.23 | Triosephosphate isomerase | Carbohydrate metabolism | |||
| 2,574 | 0.0280 | −2.28 | Glutathione S-transferase 2 | Detoxification | |||
| 950 | 0.0350 | −2.54 | – | – | – | ||
| Up-regulated | 2,742 | 0.00000021 | 19.50 | Arginine kinase | Energetic metabolism | ||
| 2,592 | 0.0000056 | 11.96 | FO174848 whole embryos embryonic stages 16–28. cDNA clone ADY0AAA20YI14 | – | |||
| 2,745 | 0.00033 | 8.91 | gb|GT617746.1|GT617746 | – | – | ||
| 2,571 | 0.0000099 | 8.81 | – | – | – | ||
| 3,059 | 0.00002 | 8.44 | S-crystallin 3 | Structural constituent of eye lens | |||
| 3,098 | 0.0000041 | 7.72 | NADP+-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase | Energetic metabolism | |||
| 2,724 | 0.0005 | 4.29 | – | – | – | ||
| 2,558 | 0.00014 | 4.25 | Nitrilase | Nitrogen compound metabolism | |||
| 3,050 | 0.000019 | 3.76 | Actin | ATP-binding | |||
| 1,827 | 0.00023 | 3.58 | Predicted: Actin, cytoplasmic 2-like isoform | ATP-binding | |||
| 1,897 | 0.001 | 2.25 | Actin beta/gamma 1 | ATP-binding | |||
| 2,166 | 0.018 | 1.56 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Carbohydrate metabolism | |||
| 1,889 | 0.043 | 1.30 | Actin beta/gamma 1 | ATP-binding | |||
| 2,151 | 0.019 | 1.04 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Carbohydrate metabolism | |||
| Down-regulated | 1,092 | 0.00033 | −1.10 | hypothetical protein LOTGIDRAFT_231565 | – | ||
| Up-regulated | 2,742 | 0.0056 | 2.66 | Arginine kinase | Energy metabolism | ||
| 1,092 | 0.001 | 2.25 | hypothetical protein LOTGIDRAFT_231565 | – | |||
| 2,166 | 0.033 | 2.06 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Carbohydrate metabolism | |||
| 2,151 | 0.0066 | 2.05 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Carbohydrate metabolism | |||
| 1,889 | 0.023 | 1.52 | Actin beta/gamma 1 | ATP-binding | |||
| Down-regulated | 2,558 | 0.01 | −1.73 | Nitrilase | Nitrogen compound metabolism | ||
| Up-regulated | 2,151 | 0.013 | 3.21 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Carbohydrate metabolism | ||
| Down-regulated | 2,724 | 0.041 | −1.15 | – | – | – | |
| 3,059 | 0.011 | −2.27 | S-crystallin 3 | Structural constituent of eye lens | |||
| 1,827 | 0.037 | −2.41 | Predicted: Actin, cytoplasmic 2-like isoform | ATP-binding | |||
| 2,558 | 0.021 | −2.65 | Nitrilase | Nitrogen compound metabolism | |||
| 3,098 | 0.017 | −2.85 | NADP-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase | Energetic metabolism | |||
Spot numbering.
Student t-test P-value.
Average fold change ratio in each condition as calculated by DeCyder BVA analysis.
Protein accession number from NCBI.
− Denotes non-identified.
Figure 2(A) Principal Component Analyses (PCA) and (B) hierarchical cluster analyses of the protein spots (sub-sets) differentially expressed of paralarvae of Octopus vulgaris corresponding to the condition 1 (I4 vs. I0) considered as function of dietary group and age (details in Supplementary Table 3). % of variance explained: PC1 = 66.6; PC2 = 11.4.
Figure 5(A) Principal Component Analyses (PCA) and (B) hierarchical cluster analyses of the protein spots (sub-sets) differentially expressed of paralarvae of Octopus vulgaris corresponding to the condition 4 (Z16 vs. A16) considered as function of dietary group and age (details in Supplementary Table 3). % of variance explained: PC1 = 72.6; PC2 = 8.
Summary of the fold changes in expression of protein identities differentially expressed in .
| S-crystallin 3 | ↑ (1.94) | ↑ (8.44) | ↓ (−2.27) | |
| Glyceraldehyde3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | ↑ (1.71) | ↑ (1.56) ↑ (1.04) | ↑ (2.06) ↑ (2.05) | ↑ (3.21) |
| Beta actin | ↑ (1.35) | |||
| Heat shock protein 70KDa | ↓ (−2.08) | |||
| Triosephosphate isomerase | ↓ (−2.23) | |||
| Glutahione-S-transferase 2 | ↓ (−2.28) | |||
| Nitrilase | ↑ (4.25) | ↓ (−1.73) | ↓ (−2.56) | |
| NADP+specific isocitrate dehydrogenase | ↑ (7.72) | ↓ (−2.85) | ||
| Actin | ↑ (3.76) | |||
| Actin beta/gamma1 | ↑ (2.25) | ↑ (1.52) | ||
| Arginine kinase | ↑ (19.5) | ↑ (2.66) |
↑, up-regulated; ↓, down-regulated in each condition studied. ( ), fold change values. I, unfed group; A, Artemia group; Z, zoeae group. Number indicates age (days). vs., versus.