Literature DB >> 28566838

Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease: A cross-sectional observational study from North India.

Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28566838      PMCID: PMC5431042          DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_124_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0974-5149


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, I read with interest the study by Saxena et al. on the birth prevalence of congenital heart diseases (CHDs) in India.[1] Based on routine clinical examination and pulse oximetry, followed by screening echocardiography for diagnosing CHDs, the authors estimated 8.07/1000 live births the prevalence of CHDs in their studied cohort. I presume that the actual prevalence of CHDs might be underrated. This is based on the following five points. First, the aforementioned prevalence was extracted from hospital-based data. Community-based data could better elucidate the true prevalence of CHDs. Second, the estimated prevalence was related only to live births and did not include macerated or malformed babies who might have CHDs. Third, in spite of making significant progress in increasing institutional births in India, the rate of home delivery is still substantial (37.7%).[2] Therefore, a good number of babies with CHDs born at home are expected to abscond medical registration. Fourth, consanguineous marriages (CMs) is still culturally preferred in India with an estimated prevalence of 12.3%.[3] Parental consanguinity, in particular, first-cousin marriage between parents, has been noticed to be one of the important risk factors for the occurrence of CHDs in India.[4] Interestingly, only 18.7% of people surveyed in India were aware of various health hazards associated with CMs.[3] Fifth, due to the limited diagnostic precision of echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has recently expanded its role in the diagnosis and management of CHDs and acquired heart diseases in the pediatric patients. It provides much diagnostic information to guide decisions.[5] I presume that conducting large-scale studies in India employing CMR could better delineate the true prevalence and pattern of CHDs in the pediatric population.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Health awareness and consequences of consanguineous marriages: a community-based study.

Authors:  Nitin Joseph; K Keshava Pavan; Keerthan Ganapathi; P Apoorva; Parul Sharma; Jai Aditya Jhamb
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2014-11-11

2.  Parental consanguinity increases congenital heart diseases in South India.

Authors:  Smitha Ramegowda; Nallur B Ramachandra
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2006 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: an expert consensus paper of the Imaging Working Group of the AEPC and the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Section of the EACVI.

Authors:  E R Valsangiacomo Buechel; L Grosse-Wortmann; S Fratz; J Eichhorn; S Sarikouch; G F Greil; P Beerbaum; C Bucciarelli-Ducci; B Bonello; L Sieverding; J Schwitter; W A Helbing
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.093

4.  Do socio-demographic factors still predict the choice of place of delivery: A cross-sectional study in rural North India.

Authors:  Jyotiranjan Sahoo; Satya Vir Singh; Vimal Kishore Gupta; Suneela Garg; Jugal Kishore
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2015-06-11

5.  Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease: A cross-sectional observational study from North India.

Authors:  Anita Saxena; Anurag Mehta; Mamta Sharma; Sudha Salhan; Mani Kalaivani; Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan; Rajnish Juneja
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.