| Literature DB >> 28566686 |
Shyam K Gore1,2, Santosh S Jadhav2, Vijaykumar V Jadhav1, S M Patange3, Mu Naushad4, Rajaram S Mane5,6,7, Kwang Ho Kim8.
Abstract
The bismuth (Bi3+)-doped cobalt ferrite nanostructures with dual phase, i.e. cubic spinel with space group Fd3m and perovskite with space group R3c, have been successfully engineered via self-ignited sol-gel combustion route. To obtain information about the phase analysis and structural parameters, like lattice constant, Rietveld refinement process is applied. The replacement of divalent Co2+ by trivalent Bi3+ cations have been confirmed from energy dispersive analysis of the ferrite samples. The micro-structural evolution of cobalt ferrite powders at room temperature under various Bi3+ doping levels have been identified from the digital photoimages recorded using scanning electron microscopy. The hyperfine interactions, like isomer shift, quadrupole splitting and magnetic hyperfine fields, and cation distribution are confirmed from the Mossbauer spectra. Saturation magnetization is increased with Bi3+-addition up to x = 0.15 and then is decreased when x = 0.2. The coercivity is increased from 1457 to 2277 G with increasing Bi3+-doping level. The saturation magnetization, coercivity and remanent ratio for x = 0.15 sample is found to be the highest, indicating the potential of Bi3+-doping in enhancing the magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28566686 PMCID: PMC5451463 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02784-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Powder XRD patterns of CBF for x = 0.0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20. Inset is the (311) peak positions of CoFe2O4 for various Bi3+-doping levels i.e. various x values.
Molar ratio, phase analysis, lattice constant and Rietveld refinement parameter i.e. Rwp, Rexp, and χ2 of CBF samples.
| Comp ‘x’ | Molar ratio Co:Bi:Fe | Fd3m Phase (%) | Lattice constant | R3c Phase (%) | Lattice constant, | RWP | Rexp | χ2 | Deduced formula of the product | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 01:00:2 | 100 | 8.38 | 0 | — | — | 2.34 | 2.17 | 1.17 | CoFe2O4 |
| 0.05 | 0.95:0.05:2 | 95 | 8.36 | 5 | 5.58 | 13.86 | 2.41 | 2.25 | 1.14 | Co0.95Bi0.05Fe2O4 |
| 0.10 | 0.9:0.1:2 | 92 | 8.37 | 8 | 5.57 | 13.85 | 2.64 | 2.37 | 1.24 | Co0.9Bi0.1Fe2O4 |
| 0.15 | 0.85:0.15:2 | 90 | 8.37 | 10 | 5.57 | 13.82 | 2.70 | 2.44 | 1.23 | Co0.85Bi0.15Fe2O4 |
| 0.20 | 0.8:0.2:2 | 88 | 8.37 | 12 | 5.60 | 13.86 | 2.87 | 2.69 | 1.14 | Co0.8Bi0.2Fe2O4 |
Figure 2Rietveld refinement of CBF for x = 0.2 samples (dotted black lines are from Fd3m space group spinel phase and blue lines are due to R3c space group of perovskite phase).
Figure 3Influence of Bi3+-doping on spinel (left) and perovskite (right) phases of CBF.
Figure 4The SEM images of CBF with; (a) x = 0.0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.10, (d) x = 0.15, (e) x = 0.20 and (g) EDS (when x = 0.20).
The stoichiometry (%) of constituent elements present in CBF powders.
| Comp. ‘x’ | Atomic abundance of elements (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | Fe | Co | Bi | Total | |
| 0.0 | 39.93 | 39.7 | 29.59 | 0 | 100 |
| 0.05 | 51.98 | 32.14 | 15.28 | 0.69 | 100 |
| 0.10 | 50.32 | 32.83 | 15.27 | 1.57 | 100 |
| 0.15 | 49.48 | 33.14 | 14.81 | 2.57 | 100 |
| 0.20 | 47.92 | 33.08 | 13.24 | 5.77 | 100 |
Figure 5Mossbauer spectra of CBF for x = 0.0, 0.1 and 0.2.
The IS, QS, Hf and A values, obtained from Mossbauer analysis, of CBF for various Bi3+ i.e. x values.
| Comp ‘x’ | Sites | Cation distribution | IS (mm/s) | QS (mm/S) | Hhf (kOe) | A (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | A | (Co0.034Fe0.966) | 0.27 | −0.008 | 52.1 | 48.30 |
| B | [Co0.966Fe1.03]O4 | 0.29 | −0.008 | 53.3 | 51.69 | |
| 0.1 | A | (Bi0.074Fe0.925) | 0.27 | −0.008 | 50.1 | 46.28 |
| B | [Co0.9Bi0.026Fe1.074]O4 | 0.29 | −0.008 | 54.1 | 53.71 | |
| 0.2 | A | (Bi0.048Fe0.952) | 0.29 | −0.008 | 50.1 | 47.57 |
| B | [Co0.8Bi0.152Fe1.048]O4 | 0.27 | −0.008 | 54.1 | 52.42 |
Figure 6Magnetic hysteresis loops measured for CBF at room temperature for different ‘x’ values.
The Ms, Hc, Mr and R values, magnetic hysteresis measurements, of CBF for different ‘x’ values.
| Comp ‘x’ | Ms (emu/g−1) | Hc (Oe) | Mr (emu/g−1) | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 26.32 | 1457 | 14.48 | 0.54 |
| 0.05 | 27.15 | 1514 | 15.21 | 0.56 |
| 0.10 | 35.60 | 1993 | 20.22 | 0.57 |
| 0.15 | 66.34 | 2277 | 37.55 | 0.57 |
| 0.20 | 44.98 | 2013 | 25.53 | 0.57 |