Literature DB >> 28566499

Finally making sense of the double-slit experiment.

Yakir Aharonov1,2,3, Eliahu Cohen4, Fabrizio Colombo5, Tomer Landsberger3, Irene Sabadini5, Daniele C Struppa6,2, Jeff Tollaksen6,2.   

Abstract

Feynman stated that the double-slit experiment "…has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery" and that "nobody can give you a deeper explanation of this phenomenon than I have given; that is, a description of it" [Feynman R, Leighton R, Sands M (1965) The Feynman Lectures on Physics]. We rise to the challenge with an alternative to the wave function-centered interpretations: instead of a quantum wave passing through both slits, we have a localized particle with nonlocal interactions with the other slit. Key to this explanation is dynamical nonlocality, which naturally appears in the Heisenberg picture as nonlocal equations of motion. This insight led us to develop an approach to quantum mechanics which relies on pre- and postselection, weak measurements, deterministic, and modular variables. We consider those properties of a single particle that are deterministic to be primal. The Heisenberg picture allows us to specify the most complete enumeration of such deterministic properties in contrast to the Schrödinger wave function, which remains an ensemble property. We exercise this approach by analyzing a version of the double-slit experiment augmented with postselection, showing that only it and not the wave function approach can be accommodated within a time-symmetric interpretation, where interference appears even when the particle is localized. Although the Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures are equivalent formulations, nevertheless, the framework presented here has led to insights, intuitions, and experiments that were missed from the old perspective.

Keywords:  Heisenberg picture; double slit experiment; modular momentum; two-state vector formalism

Year:  2017        PMID: 28566499      PMCID: PMC5488953          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704649114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Instantaneous measurement of nonlocal variables.

Authors:  Lev Vaidman
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1988-04-04       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality?

Authors:  Roger Colbeck; Renato Renner
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.161

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle.

Authors:  Yakir Aharonov; Eliahu Cohen; Ariel Landau; Avshalom C Elitzur
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms.

Authors:  Yakir Aharonov; Eliahu Cohen; Avshalom C Elitzur; Lee Smolin
Journal:  Found Phys       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  What Weak Measurements and Weak Values Really Mean: Reply to Kastner.

Authors:  Eliahu Cohen
Journal:  Found Phys       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 4.  The Weak Reality That Makes Quantum Phenomena More Natural: Novel Insights and Experiments.

Authors:  Yakir Aharonov; Eliahu Cohen; Mordecai Waegell; Avshalom C Elitzur
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  In Praise of Quantum Uncertainty.

Authors:  Eliahu Cohen; Avishy Carmi
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.