Peter D Creigh1, Michael P McDermott2, Janet E Sowden3, Michele Ferguson4, David N Herrmann5. 1. University of Rochester, Department of Neurology, United States. Electronic address: peter_creigh@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. University of Rochester, Department of Neurology, United States; University of Rochester, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, United States. Electronic address: michael_mcdermott@urmc.rochester.edu. 3. University of Rochester, Department of Neurology, United States. Electronic address: janet_sowden@urmc.rochester.edu. 4. University of Rochester, Department of Neurology, United States. Electronic address: michele_ferguson@urmc.rochester.edu. 5. University of Rochester, Department of Neurology, United States. Electronic address: david_herrmann@urmc.rochester.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in-vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) of Meissner's corpuscles (MC) in diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP). METHODS: Forty-three adults with diabetes and 21 control subjects underwent RCM of MC density at the fingertip of digit V, thenar eminence (TE), and arch of the foot, ankle skin biopsy for epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFD), electrophysiological studies, monofilament threshold testing, and timed vibration at the toe. Subjects with diabetes were subdivided into groups with and without clinical DSP using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) case definition and neuropathy outcomes were compared across groups. RESULTS: Both diabetic groups (with and without AAN clinical DSP criteria) had objective evidence of peripheral sensory involvement using conventional sensory measures, although those with clinical DSP criteria had greater abnormalities. MC densities were lower in the entire diabetic group at the TE and digit V relative to controls. MC densities at all imaging sites were associated with corresponding conventional sensory measures. MC densities were reduced in subjects without AAN clinical DSP criteria at the TE and digit V compared to controls whereas conventional upper limb sensory measures did not differ between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: In-vivo RCM of MC density at digit V is a non-invasive, painless, objective marker in diabetes that offers a window into early large fiber sensory nerve terminal loss. Further studies are needed to determine whether RCM of MCs can identify quantitative changes in DSP associated with disease progression or treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in-vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) of Meissner's corpuscles (MC) in diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP). METHODS: Forty-three adults with diabetes and 21 control subjects underwent RCM of MC density at the fingertip of digit V, thenar eminence (TE), and arch of the foot, ankle skin biopsy for epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFD), electrophysiological studies, monofilament threshold testing, and timed vibration at the toe. Subjects with diabetes were subdivided into groups with and without clinical DSP using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) case definition and neuropathy outcomes were compared across groups. RESULTS: Both diabetic groups (with and without AAN clinical DSP criteria) had objective evidence of peripheral sensory involvement using conventional sensory measures, although those with clinical DSP criteria had greater abnormalities. MC densities were lower in the entire diabetic group at the TE and digit V relative to controls. MC densities at all imaging sites were associated with corresponding conventional sensory measures. MC densities were reduced in subjects without AAN clinical DSP criteria at the TE and digit V compared to controls whereas conventional upper limb sensory measures did not differ between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: In-vivo RCM of MC density at digit V is a non-invasive, painless, objective marker in diabetes that offers a window into early large fiber sensory nerve terminal loss. Further studies are needed to determine whether RCM of MCs can identify quantitative changes in DSP associated with disease progression or treatment.
Authors: J D England; G S Gronseth; G Franklin; R G Miller; A K Asbury; G T Carter; J A Cohen; M A Fisher; J F Howard; L J Kinsella; N Latov; R A Lewis; P A Low; A J Sumner Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Maria Nolano; Vincenzo Provitera; Lucio Santoro; Telese Terme; David N Herrmann; J Neil Boger; Cortney Jansen; Christi Alessi-Fox Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J D England; G S Gronseth; G Franklin; G T Carter; L J Kinsella; J A Cohen; A K Asbury; K Szigeti; J R Lupski; N Latov; R A Lewis; P A Low; M A Fisher; D N Herrmann; J F Howard; G Lauria; R G Miller; M Polydefkis; A J Sumner Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: P J Dyck; K M Kratz; J L Karnes; W J Litchy; R Klein; J M Pach; D M Wilson; P C O'Brien; L J Melton; F J Service Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael Polydefkis; Peter Hauer; Soham Sheth; Michael Sirdofsky; John W Griffin; Justin C McArthur Journal: Brain Date: 2004-05-05 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Solomon Tesfaye; Rup Tandan; Edward J Bastyr; Keri A Kles; Vladimir Skljarevski; Karen L Price Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-07-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Peter D Creigh; Khai Du; Elizabeth P Wood; Joan Mountain; Janet Sowden; Julie Charles; Steffen Behrens-Spraggins; David N Herrmann Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Peter D Creigh; Joan Mountain; Janet E Sowden; Katy Eichinger; Bernard Ravina; Jane Larkindale; David N Herrmann Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Katy Eichinger; Janet E Sowden; Joshua Burns; Michael P McDermott; Jeffrey Krischer; John Thornton; Davide Pareyson; Steven S Scherer; Michael E Shy; Mary M Reilly; David N Herrmann Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Sabrina R Ramnarine; Patrick M Dougherty; Roman Rolke; Linda J Williams; Christi Alessi-Fox; Andrew J Coleman; Caterina Longo; Lesley A Colvin; Marie T Fallon Journal: Oncologist Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 5.837