Literature DB >> 28566048

The P Value Problem in Otolaryngology: Shifting to Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals.

Peter M Vila1, Melanie Elizabeth Townsend1, Neel K Bhatt1, W Katherine Kao1, Parul Sinha1, J Gail Neely1.   

Abstract

There is a lack of reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals in the current biomedical literature. The objective of this article is to present a discussion of the recent paradigm shift encouraging the use of reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals. Although P values help to inform us about whether an effect exists due to chance, effect sizes inform us about the magnitude of the effect (clinical significance), and confidence intervals inform us about the range of plausible estimates for the general population mean (precision). Reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals is a necessary addition to the biomedical literature, and these concepts are reviewed in this article.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confidence intervals; data interpretation; reproducibility of results; research design; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28566048      PMCID: PMC8996525          DOI: 10.1177/0194599816677735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

Review 1.  Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods.

Authors:  G Wells; D Beaton; B Shea; M Boers; L Simon; V Strand; P Brooks; P Tugwell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  The new statistics: why and how.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-12

3.  Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015.

Authors:  David Chavalarias; Joshua David Wallach; Alvin Ho Ting Li; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Enduring Evolution of the P Value.

Authors:  Demetrios N Kyriacou
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.