Literature DB >> 28565683

PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF BREEDING SITE USE AND α-AMANITIN TOLERANCE WITHIN THE DROSOPHILA QUINARIA SPECIES GROUP.

Greg S Spicer1, John Jaenike2.   

Abstract

The Drosophila quinaria group is unusual within the genus in that it comprises both mycophagous and nonmycophagous species. DNA sequence data from three regions of the mitochondrial genome were used to infer relationships among four mycophagous species and three that breed on decaying water plants. Phylogenetic analysis of these species show that breeding in mushrooms and tolerance of high levels of α-amanitin were the ancestral states within the group. Thus, breeding in decaying water plants and intolerance of α-amanitin are derived conditions. We also found that the D. quinaria species group does not comprise separate mycophagous and nonmycophagous clades, but rather that (1) the shift from mushrooms to decaying plants occurred on at least two occasions; or (2) mycophagy reevolved within a lineage that had previously shifted to breeding on plants. The correlation between mycophagy and α-amanitin tolerance is perfect across the species we have examined, indicating that there is no detectable time lag between an ecological shift to a new breeding site and correlated changes in biochemical adaptation. The genetic distance between the mycophagous D. recens and the nonmycophagous D. quinaria indicates that these species split only about 1 M.Y.B.P. In terms of α-amanitin tolerance, D. recens and D. quinaria are typical of other ecologically similar species within the group. Thus, evolutionary changes in α-amanitin tolerance can evidently occur on the order of about 1 million yr. Our data also indicate that, in comparison to other groups of Drosophila, the quinaria species group may be undergoing an adaptive radiation. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive radiation; cytochrome oxidase; genetic distance; host shifts; maximum likelihood analysis; molecular clock; mycophagy

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565683     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03620.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  The modular expression patterns of three pigmentation genes prefigure unique abdominal morphologies seen among three Drosophila species.

Authors:  William A Dion; Mujeeb O Shittu; Tessa E Steenwinkel; Komal K B Raja; Prajakta P Kokate; Thomas Werner
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.224

Review 2.  The genus Drosophila is characterized by a large number of sibling species showing evolutionary significance.

Authors:  Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  A phylogenetic examination of host use evolution in the quinaria and testacea groups of Drosophila.

Authors:  Clare H Scott Chialvo; Brooke E White; Laura K Reed; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Long-Term Resistance of Drosophila melanogaster to the Mushroom Toxin Alpha-Amanitin.

Authors:  Chelsea L Mitchell; Roger D Yeager; Zachary J Johnson; Stephanie E D'Annunzio; Kara R Vogel; Thomas Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  α-amanitin resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: A genome-wide association approach.

Authors:  Chelsea L Mitchell; Catrina E Latuszek; Kara R Vogel; Ian M Greenlund; Rebecca E Hobmeier; Olivia K Ingram; Shannon R Dufek; Jared L Pecore; Felicia R Nip; Zachary J Johnson; Xiaohui Ji; Hairong Wei; Oliver Gailing; Thomas Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Inter- and intraspecific variation in mycotoxin tolerance: A study of four Drosophila species.

Authors:  Prajakta P Kokate; Morgan Smith; Lucinda Hall; Kui Zhang; Thomas Werner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Exhaustive extraction of cyclopeptides from Amanita phalloides: Guidelines for working with complex mixtures of secondary metabolites.

Authors:  Clare H Scott Chialvo; Logan H Griffin; Laura K Reed; Lukasz Ciesla
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.