Literature DB >> 28565650

ALLOZYME AND ADVERTISEMENT CALL VARIATION IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS.

Michael J Ryan1,2, A Stanley Rand2, Lee A Weigt2.   

Abstract

We analyzed variation in advertisement calls and allozymes in 30 populations along a 5000-km transect throughout most of the range of the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. All 12 call variables measured show significant differences among populations despite the importance of the advertisement call in species recognition. Some call variables exhibited clinal variation, whereas most others differed between the two major allozyme groups that have invaded Panama at different times, perhaps 4-4.5 million yr apart. Call variables that primarily affect discrimination among conspecifics tended to exhibit greater variation than call variables that are crucial for species recognition. The proximate mechanism of production underlying a call variable, however, is a better predictor of its variation. Contrary to predictions of some sexual selection models, call variation exhibits predictable patterns of geographical variation, although a substantial portion of variation among populations is not explained by geographic position. Although allozymes, calls, and geography usually covary, closer populations can have more similar calls independent of allozyme similarity. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advertisement calls; Physalaemus pustulosus; allozyme variation; genetic variation; geographical variation; sexual selection; túngara frog

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565650     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03630.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Molecular patterns of differentiation in canyon treefrogs (Hyla arenicolor): evidence for introgressive hybridization with the Arizona treefrog (H. wrightorum) and correlations with advertisement call differences.

Authors:  K E Klymus; S C Humfeld; V T Marshall; D Cannatella; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Ecological and genetic divergence between two lineages of middle American túngara frogs Physalaemus (= Engystomops) pustulosus.

Authors:  Heike Pröhl; Santiago R Ron; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Geographic variation in advertisement calls in a tree frog species: gene flow and selection hypotheses.

Authors:  Yikweon Jang; Eun Hye Hahm; Hyun-Jung Lee; Soyeon Park; Yong-Jin Won; Jae C Choe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Early ontogeny and sequence heterochronies in Leiuperinae frogs (Anura: Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  Jimena Grosso; Diego Baldo; Darío Cardozo; Francisco Kolenc; Claudio Borteiro; Marianna I R de Oliveira; Marcelo F Bonino; Diego A Barrasso; Florencia Vera Candioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Stream noise, hybridization, and uncoupled evolution of call traits in two lineages of poison frogs: Oophaga histrionica and Oophaga lehmanni.

Authors:  Fernando Vargas-Salinas; Adolfo Amézquita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Geographic variation in sexual attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda corn- and rice-strain males to pheromone lures.

Authors:  Melanie Unbehend; Sabine Hänniger; Gissella M Vásquez; María Laura Juárez; Dominic Reisig; Jeremy N McNeil; Robert L Meagher; David A Jenkins; David G Heckel; Astrid T Groot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Species specificity and intraspecific variation in the chemical profiles of Heliconius butterflies across a large geographic range.

Authors:  Kathy Darragh; Gabriela Montejo-Kovacevich; Krzysztof M Kozak; Colin R Morrison; Clarisse M E Figueiredo; Jonathan S Ready; Camilo Salazar; Mauricio Linares; Kelsey J R P Byers; Richard M Merrill; W Owen McMillan; Stefan Schulz; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.