Literature DB >> 28565472

THE RATE AND EFFECTS DISTRIBUTION OF VIABILITY MUTATION IN DROSOPHILA: MINIMUM DISTANCE ESTIMATION.

Aurora García-Dorado1.   

Abstract

The empirical distribution of the mean viability of mutation accumulation lines, obtained from three published experiments, was analyzed using minimum-distance estimation. In two cases (Mukai et al. 1972; Ohnishi 1977), mutations were allowed to accumulate in copies of chromosome II protected from natural selection and recombination. In the other one (Fernández and López-Fanjul 1996), they accumulated in inbred lines derived from an isogenic stock. In contrast with currently accepted hypotheses, we consistently estimated low (about 0.01) genomic viability mutation rates, λ, and a small kurtosis of the distribution of mutational effects on viability (a) in the three datasets. Minimum-distance estimates of the per-generation mean viability change due to mutation (λE[a]) were also obtained. These were very similar for both chromosomal datasets, their absolute values being about five times smaller than estimates obtained from the observed change in mean viability during the mutation process. It must be noted that, in both experiments, viability was measured relative to the Cy chromosome of a Cy/Pm stock. Thus, an unnoticed viability increase in this Cy chromosome may have resulted in overestimation of the mean viability reduction in the lines. In parallel, minimum-distance estimation of λE(a) from inbred lines data (where the selective pressure during the accumulation process was larger) was even somewhat smaller, in absolute value, and very close to the estimate obtained by comparing the mean viability of the lines with that of the control isogenic line. The evolutionary importance of these results, as well as their relevance to the solution of the mutational load paradox, is discussed. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distribution of viability mutational effects; Drosophila melanogaster; viability mutation rate

Year:  1997        PMID: 28565472     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03960.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Frank Shaw; Catherine Steding; Margaret Baumgartner; Alicia Hawkins; Andrew Houppert; Nicole Mason; Marissa Reed; Kevin Simonelic; Wayne Woodard; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Analysis and implications of mutational variation.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Daniel L Halligan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Rapid increase in viability due to new beneficial mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Priti Azad; Mingchai Zhang; R C Woodruff
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Spontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S T Schultz; M Lynch; J H Willis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Increase in viability due to the accumulation of X chromosome mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males.

Authors:  Ronny C Woodruff; Michael A Balinski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Rate and effects of spontaneous mutations that affect fitness in mutator Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sandra Trindade; Lilia Perfeito; Isabel Gordo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Are mutations usually deleterious? A perspective on the fitness effects of mutation accumulation.

Authors:  Kevin Bao; Robert H Melde; Nathaniel P Sharp
Journal:  Evol Ecol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.074

Review 8.  Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferring the distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Katharina B Böndel; Susanne A Kraemer; Toby Samuels; Deirdre McClean; Josianne Lachapelle; Rob W Ness; Nick Colegrave; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Purging of deleterious burden in the endangered Iberian lynx.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman-Ruiz; Maria Lucena-Perez; Beatriz Villanueva; Jesús Fernández; Alexander P Saveljev; Mirosław Ratkiewicz; Krzysztof Schmidt; Nicolas Galtier; Aurora García-Dorado; José A Godoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.