Literature DB >> 28565430

LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE AT LOW TEMPERATURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF NOCTURNALITY IN GECKOS.

Kellar Autumn1,2, Devin Jindrich2, Dale DeNardo2, Rachel Mueller2.   

Abstract

Nocturnal geckos are active at body temperatures 10-35°C below the thermal optima for maximum rate of aerobic metabolism (V.O2max) of diurnal lizards. Therefore, given ancestral (diurnal) lizard physiology, nocturnality causes a substantial thermal handicap in locomotor performance. In prior studies, we hypothesized that a low minimum cost of locomotion (Cmin ) in geckos was an adaptation that increased locomotor endurance capacity at low, nocturnal temperatures. However, Cmin is only part of an integrated system that, in conjunction with the maximum rate of oxygen consumption, sets the maximum speed that can be sustained aerobically (termed the maximum aerobic speed or MAS). We conducted the first phylogenetic analysis of MAS and V.O2max lizards and found that the greatest changes in MAS, Cmin and V.O2max (at activity temperatures) in the evolutionary history of lizards all coincided with the evolution of nocturnality in geckos. Geckos active at 15-25°C did not become optimized for nocturnal temperatures, or fully offset the thermal effects of nocturnality by evolving maximal rates of oxygen consumption comparable to diurnal lizards active at 35°C. Geckos did evolve MAS twice that of diurnal lizards running at low temperatures by evolving a remarkably low Cmin . Allometric analysis and phylogenetically independent contrasts of V.O2max, Cmin , and MAS indicate a 72% evolutionary decrease in V.O2max, (at activity temperatures) and a 50% evolutionary decrease in Cmin concordant with the evolution of nocturnality in geckos. Experimental measurements show that decreased Cmin in six species of gecko increased MAS by 50-120% compared to diurnal lizards at low temperatures. Thus, geckos sufficiently overcame the near paralyzing effects of nocturnal temperatures, but only offset about 50% of the decrease in MAS resulting from the low maximum rate of oxygen consumption. Although the nocturnal environment remains severely suboptimal, the evolution of a low cost of locomotion in the ancestor of geckos was highly adaptive for nocturnality. We also present a generalized approach to ecophysiological evolution that integrates phylogeny with the causal relationships among environment, physiology, and performance capacity. With respect to a clade, two hypotheses are central to our integrative approach: (1) a change of an environmental variable (e.g., temperature) causes a performance handicap; and (2) evolution of a physiological variable (e.g., minimum cost of locomotion [Cmin ]) increases performance in the derived environment. To test the hypothesis that evolution of a physiological variable is adaptive in nature, we suggest determining if individuals in nature perform at levels exceeding the performance capacity of their hypothetical ancestors and if this additional performance capacity is due to the evolution of the physiological variable in question. © 1999 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energetics; exercise; integrative biology; lizard; locomotion; optimality; physiology

Year:  1999        PMID: 28565430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb03793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

1.  Nocturnal lizards from a cool-temperate environment have high metabolic rates at low temperatures.

Authors:  Kelly M Hare; Shirley Pledger; Michael B Thompson; John H Miller; Charles H Daugherty
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Thermal dependence of locomotor performance in two cool-temperate lizards.

Authors:  Mya J Gaby; Anne A Besson; Chalene N Bezzina; Amanda J Caldwell; Sarai Cosgrove; Alison Cree; Steff Haresnape; Kelly M Hare
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Phylogenetic comparisons of pedestrian locomotion costs: confirmations and new insights.

Authors:  Craig R White; Lesley A Alton; Taryn S Crispin; Lewis G Halsey
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Evolution of diel activity patterns in skinks (Squamata: Scincidae), the world's second-largest family of terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  Alex Slavenko; Liat Dror; Marco Camaiti; Jules E Farquhar; Glenn M Shea; David G Chapple; Shai Meiri
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Nicolás Pelegrin; Kirk O Winemiller; Laurie J Vitt; Daniel B Fitzgerald; Eric R Pianka
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.