Literature DB >> 28565395

FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY IN CENTRAL AND MARGINAL POPULATIONS OF LYCHNIS VISCARIA IN RELATION TO GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS.

Pirkko Siikamäki1, Antti Lammi2.   

Abstract

Developmental instability in the form of increased fluctuating asymmetry can be caused by either genetic or environmental stress. Because extinctions can be attributed broadly to these factors, fluctuating asymmetry may provide a sensitive tool for detecting such stresses. We studied the level of fluctuating asymmetry of flowers of a perennial outcrossing plant species, Lychnis viscaria, both in natural and common-garden populations. The degree of flower asymmetry was higher in small, isolated, and marginal populations of the species range. These marginal populations also were the most homozygous. In the core area of the species' range, flowers were more symmetrical The level of asymmetry was correlated with both population size and heterozygosity. However, a partial correlation analysis revealed that when the impact of population size was controlled for, there was a negative relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and heterozygosity, whereas when controlling for heterozygosity, no relationship between population size and fluctuating asymmetry was found. This indicates that genetic consequences of small population size probably underlie the relationship between the level of asymmetry and population size. Results from a transplantation experiment showed that individuals subjected to a higher environmental stress had an increased level of asymmetry compared to control plants. In the common-garden conditions the level of fluctuating asymmetry did not differ between the central and marginal populations. This suggests that presumably both genetic and environmental factors affected to the higher level of asymmetry among marginal populations compared to central ones. In all we conclude that even though fluctuating asymmetry seems to be a sensitive tool for detecting stresses, results from studies focusing on only one factor should be interpreted with caution. © 1998 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental instability; Lychnis viscaria; environmental stress; fluctuating asymmetry; genetic stress; marginal populations; population size

Year:  1998        PMID: 28565395     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02010.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  High levels of fluctuating asymmetry in isolated stickleback populations.

Authors:  Nina Trokovic; Gábor Herczeg; Nurul Izza Ab Ghani; Takahito Shikano; Juha Merilä
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Developmental stability covaries with genome-wide and single-locus heterozygosity in house sparrows.

Authors:  Carl Vangestel; Joachim Mergeay; Deborah A Dawson; Viki Vandomme; Luc Lens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Testing the relationship between human occupancy in the landscape and tadpole developmental stress.

Authors:  Paula C Eterovick; Luís F F Bar; Jorge B Souza; José F M Castro; Felipe S F Leite; Ross A Alford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Directional asymmetry and direction-giving factors: Lessons from flowers with complex symmetry.

Authors:  Sanja Budečević; Sanja Manitašević Jovanović; Ana Vuleta; Branka Tucić; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.839

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.