Literature DB >> 28565360

SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND SELECTION IN THE WILD IN THE WATERSTRIDER AQUARIUS REMIGIS: LIFETIME FECUNDITY SELECTION ON FEMALE TOTAL LENGTH AND ITS COMPONENTS.

Richard F Preziosi1, Daphne J Fairbairn2.   

Abstract

Darwin's fecundity advantage model is often cited as the cause of female biased size dimorphism, however, the empirical studies of lifetime selection on male and female body size that would be required to demonstrate this are few. As a component of a study relating sexual size dimorphism to lifetime selection in natural populations of the female size-biased waterstrider Aquarius remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae), we estimated coefficients for daily fecundity selection, longevity selection, and lifetime fecundity selection acting on female body size and components of body size for two consecutive generations. Daily fecundity was estimated using females confined in field enclosures and reproductive survival was estimated by twice-weekly recaptures. We found that daily fecundity selection favored females with longer total length through direct selection acting on abdomen length. Longevity selection favored females with smaller total length. When daily fecundity and reproductive longevity were combined to estimate lifetime fecundity we found significant balancing selection acting on total length in both years. The relationship between daily fecundity and reproductive longevity also reveals a significant cost of reproduction in one of two years. We relate these selection estimates to previous estimates of sexual selection on male body size and consider the relationship between contemporary selection and sexual size dimorphism. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balancing selection; cost of reproduction; daily fecundity; fecundity advantage; lifetime fecundity; longevity

Year:  1997        PMID: 28565360     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02434.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  2 in total

1.  Drought survival and reproduction impose contrasting selection pressures on maximum body size and sexual size dimorphism in a snake, Seminatrix pygaea.

Authors:  Christopher T Winne; John D Willson; J Whitfield Gibbons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Piotr G Jablonski; Beobkyun Kim; Frank C Park
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.260

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.