Literature DB >> 28565228

BODY SIZE DECLINES DESPITE POSITIVE DIRECTIONAL SELECTION ON HERITABLE SIZE TRAITS IN A BARNACLE GOOSE POPULATION.

Kjell Larsson1, Henk P van der Jeugd1, Ineke T van der Veen1,2, Pär Forslund3.   

Abstract

Analyses of more than 2000 marked barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis) in the largest Baltic colony, Sweden, showed that structurally large females generally produced larger clutches and larger eggs, hatched their broods earlier in the season, and produced more and heavier young than smaller females. In males, the corresponding relationships between reproductive parameters and structural body size were weaker or nonsignificant. Because structural body size traits have previously been found to be significantly heritable and positively genetically correlated, an increase in mean structural body size of individuals as a response to selection might have been expected. By contrast, we found that the mean adult head length and mean adult tarsus length decreased significantly in the largest colony by approximately 0.7 and 0.5 standard deviations, respectively, in both males and females during the 13-year study period. Environmental factors, such as the amount of rain in different years, were found to affect the availability of high-quality food for growing geese. As a consequence of this temporal variability in the availability of high-quality food, the mean adult structural body size of different cohorts differed by up to 1.3 standard deviations. Comparisons of mean body size of cohorts born in different colonies suggest that the most likely explanation for the body-size decline in the main study colony is that a density-dependent process, which mainly was in effect during the very early phase of colony growth, negatively affected juvenile growth and final size. We conclude that large environmental effects on growth and final structural body size easily can mask microevolutionary responses to selection. Analyses of environmental causes underlying temporal and spatial body size variation should always be considered in the reconstruction and prediction of evolutionary changes in natural populations. © 1998 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barnacle goose; Branta leucopsis; body size; food quality; reproductive success; selection; survival

Year:  1998        PMID: 28565228     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01843.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Risk of herbivore attack and heritability of ontogenetic trajectories in plant defense.

Authors:  Sofía Ochoa-López; Roberto Rebollo; Kasey E Barton; Juan Fornoni; Karina Boege
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Correlates of lifetime reproductive success in three species of European ducks.

Authors:  Peter Blums; Robert G Clark
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The dynamics of a quantitative trait in an age-structured population living in a variable environment.

Authors:  Tim Coulson; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Cryptic evolution: does environmental deterioration have a genetic basis?

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield; Alastair J Wilson; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Examining adaptive evolution of immune activity: opportunities provided by gastropods in the age of 'omics'.

Authors:  Otto Seppälä; Cansu Çetin; Teo Cereghetti; Philine G D Feulner; Coen M Adema
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  Heterogeneity of genetic architecture of body size traits in a free-living population.

Authors:  Camillo Bérénos; Philip A Ellis; Jill G Pilkington; S Hong Lee; Jake Gratten; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Do foraging methods in winter affect morphology during growth in juvenile snow geese?

Authors:  Jón Einar Jónsson; Alan D Afton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Postnatal growth rate varies with latitude in range-expanding geese: The role of plasticity and day length.

Authors:  Michiel P Boom; Henk P van der Jeugd; Boas Steffani; Bart A Nolet; Kjell Larsson; Götz Eichhorn
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.