Literature DB >> 28565153

MECHANISMS OF LARGE-SCALE EVOLUTIONARY TRENDS.

Daniel W McShea1.   

Abstract

Large-scale evolutionary trends may result from driving forces or from passive diffusion in bounded spaces. Such trends are persistent directional changes in higher taxa spanning significant periods of geological time; examples include the frequently cited long-term trends in size, complexity, and fitness in life as a whole, as well as trends in lesser supraspecific taxa and trends in space. In a driven trend, the distribution mean increases on account of a force (which may manifest itself as a bias in the direction of change) that acts on lineages throughout the space in which diversification occurs. In a passive system, no pervasive force or bias exists, but the mean increases because change in one direction is blocked by a boundary, or other inhomogeneity, in some limited region of the space. Two tests have been used to distinguish these trend mechanisms: (1) the test based on the behavior of the minimum; and (2) the ancestor-descendant test, based on comparisons in a random sample of ancestor-descendant pairs that lie far from any possible lower bound. For skewed distributions, a third test is introduced here: (3) the subclade test, based on the mean skewness of a sample of subclades drawn from the tail of a terminal distribution. With certain restrictions, a system is driven if the minimum increases, if increases significantly outnumber decreases among ancestor-descendant pairs, and if the mean skew of subclades is significantly positive. A passive mechanism is more difficult to demonstrate but is the more likely mechanism if decreases outnumber increases and if the mean skew of subclades is negative. Unlike the other tests, the subclade test requires no detailed phylogeny or paleontological time series, but only terminal (e.g., modern) distributions. Monte Carlo simulations of the diversification of a clade are used to show how the subclade test works. In the empirical cases examined, the three tests gave concordant results, suggesting first, that they work, and second, that the passive and driven mechanisms may correspond to natural categories of causes of large-scale trends. © 1994 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion; driven trend; evolutionary trends; passive trend; trend mechanisms

Year:  1994        PMID: 28565153     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  27 in total

1.  Invariant size-frequency distributions along a latitudinal gradient in marine bivalves.

Authors:  K Roy; D Jablonski; K K Martien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Latitudinal variation in the shape of the species body size distribution: an analysis using freshwater fishes.

Authors:  Jason H Knouft
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Peter J Wagner; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Macroevolutionary dynamics in environmental space and the latitudinal diversity gradient in New World birds.

Authors:  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; Thiago Fernando L V B Rangel; Luis Mauricio Bini; Bradford A Hawkins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Hierarchical complexity and the size limits of life.

Authors:  Noel A Heim; Jonathan L Payne; Seth Finnegan; Matthew L Knope; Michał Kowalewski; S Kathleen Lyons; Daniel W McShea; Philip M Novack-Gottshall; Felisa A Smith; Steve C Wang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Is there an optimal level of open-endedness in prebiotic evolution?

Authors:  Omer Markovitch; Daniel Sorek; Leong Ting Lui; Doron Lancet; Natalio Krasnogor
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.950

8.  Bone histology of varanopids (Synapsida) from Richards Spur, Oklahoma, sheds light on growth patterns and lifestyle in early terrestrial colonizers.

Authors:  Adam K Huttenlocker; Christen D Shelton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Operationalizing evolutionary transitions in individuality.

Authors:  Yohay Carmel; Ayelet Shavit
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Vertebrate body size jumps the Wright way.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.