Literature DB >> 28565149

RUNAWAY EVOLUTION TO SELF-EXTINCTION UNDER ASYMMETRICAL COMPETITION.

Hiroyuki Matsuda1, Peter A Abrams1.   

Abstract

We analyze a popular model of the evolution of traits related to performance in exploitative competition. This model has previously been used to explain a mechanism by which interspecific competition can cause taxon cycles. We show that purely intraspecific competition can cause evolution of extreme competitive abilities that ultimately result in extinction, without any influence from other species. The only change in the model required for this outcome is the assumption of a nonnormal distribution of resources of different sizes measured on a logarithmic scale. This suggests that taxon cycles, if they exist, may be driven by within- rather than between-species competition. Self-extinction does not occur when the advantage conferred by a large value of the competitive trait (e.g., size) is relatively small, or when the carrying capacity decreases at a comparatively rapid rate with increases in trait value. The evidence regarding these assumptions is discussed. The results suggest a need for more data on resource distributions and size-advantage in order to understand the evolution of competitive traits such as body size. © 1994 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Anolis; competition; evolutionarily stable strategy; frequency dependence; size-advantage; taxon cycle

Year:  1994        PMID: 28565149     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02212.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Remarks on branching-extinction evolutionary cycles.

Authors:  Fabio Dercole
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Coevolution of slow-fast populations: evolutionary sliding, evolutionary pseudo-equilibria and complex Red Queen dynamics.

Authors:  F Dercole; R Ferrière; A Gragnani; S Rinaldi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Asymmetric competition impacts evolutionary rescue in a changing environment.

Authors:  Courtney L Van Den Elzen; Elizabeth J Kleynhans; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks, adaptive dynamics and evolutionary rescue theory.

Authors:  Regis Ferriere; Stéphane Legendre
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Trade-off shapes diversity in eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Farnoush Farahpour; Mohammadkarim Saeedghalati; Verena S Brauer; Daniel Hoffmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Rate-induced collapse in evolutionary systems.

Authors:  Constantin W Arnscheidt; Daniel H Rothman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

7.  Competition-colonization trade-offs, competitive uncertainty, and the evolutionary assembly of species.

Authors:  Pradeep Pillai; Frédéric Guichard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The impact of individual variation on abrupt collapses in mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Gaurav Baruah
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 11.274

Review 9.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a disturbed world: implications for the maintenance of ecological networks.

Authors:  Nicolas Loeuille
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-24

10.  Self-extinction through optimizing selection.

Authors:  Kalle Parvinen; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.691

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.