Literature DB >> 28564700

Nighttime Driving in Older Adults: Effects of Glare and Association With Mesopic Visual Function.

Janessa A Kimlin1, Alex A Black1, Joanne M Wood1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the associations between nighttime driving performance of older drivers and photopic, mesopic, and glare-based tests of visual function.
Methods: Participants included 26 older drivers (71.8 ± 6.3 years), with minimal or no eye disease, but who reported vision-related nighttime driving difficulties. Nighttime driving performance was assessed on a closed-road circuit, which included intermittent glare. An overall driving performance score was calculated based on detection of signs, pedestrians, wooden animals and road markings, lane-keeping, and avoidance of low contrast hazards. Visual function tests included photopic and mesopic visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS). Tests of glare (Berkeley Glare and Aston Halometer) and mesopic motion sensitivity were also assessed. Regression analyses were used to explore the associations between these vision measures and nighttime driving performance.
Results: The overall driving performance score was significantly reduced by intermittent glare (P = 0.002); notably, pedestrian detection decreased by 38% in the presence of intermittent glare (P < 0.001). Overall driving scores were most strongly associated with motion sensitivity (P = 0.001) and mesopic high contrast VA (P = 0.002), rather than photopic or glare-based tests. Motion sensitivity accounted for more than twice the variation in driving performance compared to photopic high contrast VA (29% vs. 14%). Conclusions: Glare reduced several aspects of nighttime driving performance. Mesopic tests of visual function, including motion sensitivity and mesopic high contrast VA, were more strongly associated with nighttime driving performance than photopic high-contrast VA. These results highlight the potential importance of nonstandard vision tests for assessing older drivers' visual capacity to drive at night.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28564700     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-21219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  19 in total

1.  Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.

Authors:  František Pluháček; John Siderov
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Agreement between subjective and predicted high and low contrast visual acuities with a double-pass system.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Noemi Burguera; David P Piñero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Development of a Method to Potentially Substitute Direct Evaluation of Mesopic Visual Acuity in Drivers.

Authors:  Marta Garcia-Rojo; Cristina Bonnin-Arias; Eva Chamorro; Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Celia Sanchez-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  From Presbyopia to Cataracts: A Critical Review on Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; David P Piñero
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Intraocular scattering as a predictor of driving performance in older adults with cataracts.

Authors:  Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina; Carolina Ortiz; Carlos Salas; Miriam Casares-López; Margarita Soler; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Low Luminance Visual Acuity and Low Luminance Deficit in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Eleni Karatsai; Piyali Sen; Sarega Gurudas; Sobha Sivaprasad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  How do different lighting conditions affect the vision and quality of life of people with glaucoma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jamie Enoch; Lee Jones; Deanna J Taylor; Carol Bronze; James F Kirwan; Pete R Jones; David P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Association of Photopic and Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity in older drivers with risk of motor vehicle collision using naturalistic driving data.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Thomas Swain; Rong Liu; Gerald McGwin; Mi Young Kwon
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Randomized Crossover Trial Evaluating the Impact of Senofilcon A Photochromic Lens on Driving Performance.

Authors:  John R Buch; Youssef Toubouti; Jessica Cannon
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  Impact of Age-Related Vision Changes on Driving.

Authors:  Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina; Carolina Ortiz; Miriam Casares-López; José J Castro-Torres; Luis Jiménez Del Barco; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.