Valentine Heidelberger1, Saskia Ingen-Housz-Oro2, Alicia Marquet3, Matthieu Mahevas4, Didier Bessis5, Laurence Bouillet6, Frédéric Caux7, Catherine Chapelon-Abric8, Sébastien Debarbieux9, Emmanuel Delaporte10, Anne-Bénédicte Duval-Modeste11, Olivier Fain12, Pascal Joly11, Sylvain Marchand-Adam13, Jean-Benoît Monfort14, Nicolas Noël15, Thierry Passeron16, Marc Ruivard17, Françoise Sarrot-Reynauld6, Denis Verrot18, Diane Bouvry19, Laurence Fardet20, Olivier Chosidow20, Pascal Sève3, Dominique Valeyre19. 1. Department of Dermatology, AP-HP Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. 2. Department of Dermatology, AP-HP Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France2Department of Dermatology, EA 7379 - EpiDermE, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, APHP Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. 5. Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France. 7. Department of Dermatology, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, APHP Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. 9. Department of Dermatology, Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France. 10. Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France. 11. Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France. 12. Department of Internal Medicine, APHP Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France. 13. Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France. 14. Department of Dermatology, APHP Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France. 15. Department of Internal Medicine, APHP Hôpital Bicêtre Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 16. Department of Dermatology, Hôpital de l'Archet, Nice, France. 17. Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 18. Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Marseille, France. 19. Department of Pneumology, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France. 20. Department of Dermatology, AP-HP Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France2Department of Dermatology, EA 7379 - EpiDermE, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France20Department of Dermatology, Université Paris Est UPEC, Créteil, France.
Abstract
Importance: Evidence for the long-term efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents (anti-TNF) in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis is lacking. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis in a large observational study. Design, Setting, and Participants: STAT (Sarcoidosis Treated with Anti-TNF) is a French retrospective and prospective multicenter observational database that receives data from teaching hospitals and referral centers, as well as several pneumology, dermatology, and internal medicine departments. Included patients had histologically proven sarcoidosis and received anti-TNF between January 2004 and January 2016. We extracted data for patients with skin involvement at anti-TNF initiation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Response to treatment was evaluated for skin and visceral involvement using the ePOST (extra-pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool) severity score (from 0 [not affected] to 6 [very severe involvement]). Epidemiological and cutaneous features at baseline, efficacy, steroid-sparing, safety, and relapses were recorded. The overall cutaneous response rate (OCRR) was defined as complete (final cutaneous ePOST score of 0 or 1) or partial response (ePOST drop ≥2 points from baseline but >1 at last follow-up). Results: Among 140 patients in the STAT database, 46 had skin involvement. The most frequent lesions were lupus pernio (n = 21 [46%]) and nodules (n = 20 [43%]). The median cutaneous severity score was 5 and/or 6 at baseline. Twenty-one patients were treated for skin involvement and 25 patients for visceral involvement. Reasons for initiating anti-TNF were failure or adverse effects of previous therapy in 42 patients (93%). Most patients received infliximab (n = 40 [87%]), with systemic steroids in 28 cases (61%) and immunosuppressants in 32 cases (69.5%). The median (range) follow-up was 45 (3-103) months. Of the 46 patients with sarcoidosis and skin involvement who were treated with anti-TNF were included, median (range) age was 50 (14-78) years, and 33 patients (72%) were women. The OCRR was 24% after 3 months, 46% after 6 months, and 79% after 12 months. Steroid sparing was significant. Treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in 11 patients (24%), and 21 infectious events occurred in 14 patients (30%). Infections were more frequent in patients treated for visceral involvement than in those treated for skin involvement (n = 12 of 25 [48%] vs n = 2 of 21 [9.5%], respectively; P = .02). The relapse rate was 44% 18 months after discontinuation of treatment. Relapses during treatment occurred in 35% of cases, mostly during anti-TNF or concomitant treatment tapering. Conclusions and Relevance: Anti-TNF agents are effective but suspensive in cutaneous sarcoidosis. The risk of infectious events must be considered.
Importance: Evidence for the long-term efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents (anti-TNF) in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis is lacking. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis in a large observational study. Design, Setting, and Participants: STAT (Sarcoidosis Treated with Anti-TNF) is a French retrospective and prospective multicenter observational database that receives data from teaching hospitals and referral centers, as well as several pneumology, dermatology, and internal medicine departments. Included patients had histologically proven sarcoidosis and received anti-TNF between January 2004 and January 2016. We extracted data for patients with skin involvement at anti-TNF initiation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Response to treatment was evaluated for skin and visceral involvement using the ePOST (extra-pulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool) severity score (from 0 [not affected] to 6 [very severe involvement]). Epidemiological and cutaneous features at baseline, efficacy, steroid-sparing, safety, and relapses were recorded. The overall cutaneous response rate (OCRR) was defined as complete (final cutaneous ePOST score of 0 or 1) or partial response (ePOST drop ≥2 points from baseline but >1 at last follow-up). Results: Among 140 patients in the STAT database, 46 had skin involvement. The most frequent lesions were lupus pernio (n = 21 [46%]) and nodules (n = 20 [43%]). The median cutaneous severity score was 5 and/or 6 at baseline. Twenty-one patients were treated for skin involvement and 25 patients for visceral involvement. Reasons for initiating anti-TNF were failure or adverse effects of previous therapy in 42 patients (93%). Most patients received infliximab (n = 40 [87%]), with systemic steroids in 28 cases (61%) and immunosuppressants in 32 cases (69.5%). The median (range) follow-up was 45 (3-103) months. Of the 46 patients with sarcoidosis and skin involvement who were treated with anti-TNF were included, median (range) age was 50 (14-78) years, and 33 patients (72%) were women. The OCRR was 24% after 3 months, 46% after 6 months, and 79% after 12 months. Steroid sparing was significant. Treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in 11 patients (24%), and 21 infectious events occurred in 14 patients (30%). Infections were more frequent in patients treated for visceral involvement than in those treated for skin involvement (n = 12 of 25 [48%] vs n = 2 of 21 [9.5%], respectively; P = .02). The relapse rate was 44% 18 months after discontinuation of treatment. Relapses during treatment occurred in 35% of cases, mostly during anti-TNF or concomitant treatment tapering. Conclusions and Relevance: Anti-TNF agents are effective but suspensive in cutaneous sarcoidosis. The risk of infectious events must be considered.
Authors: Marjolein Drent; Johanna P Cremers; Tim L Jansen; Robert P Baughman Journal: Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 0.670
Authors: Robert P Baughman; Marc A Judson; Elyse E Lower; Marjolein Drent; Ulrich Costabel; Susan Flavin; Kim Hung Lo; Elliot S Barnathan Journal: Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 0.670
Authors: Matthew C Baker; Khushboo Sheth; Ronald Witteles; Mark C Genovese; Stanford Shoor; Julia F Simard Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Gabriela Higino de Souza; Chan I Thien; Victor Bechara de Castro; Alexandre Carlos Gripp Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2018 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Astrid C van Stigt; Willem A Dik; Lieke S J Kamphuis; Bas M Smits; Joris M van Montfrans; P Martin van Hagen; Virgil A S H Dalm; Hanna IJspeert Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 7.561