Literature DB >> 28564375

OLFACTORY-BULB SIZE AND NOCTURNALITY IN BIRDS.

Sue Healy1, Tim Guilford1.   

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that, despite earlier beliefs, many birds have a functional sense of smell. There is also considerable variation in olfactory-bulb size among bird species, yet the evolutionary significance of this variation has remained elusive. We argue that birds living under low-light conditions, where vision is less efficient, should have evolved or maintained an increased olfactory ability and, hence, larger olfactory bulbs. Using a family-level comparative analysis to control at least partially for taxonomic artifacts, we show that none of a series of ecological variables (diet, nest type, development, nest dispersion, and migratory behavior) accounts for variation in olfactory-bulb size once the effects of body size and brain size (measured by cerebral-hemisphere length) have been controlled. Activity timing, however, accounts for significant variation even after the removal of these other variables. We discovered 13 independent cases in which nocturnal or crepuscular lineages have evolved a diurnal habit, or vice versa, and compared relative olfactory-bulb sizes between each branch pair. In all but one case, nocturnal or crepuscular birds have larger olfactory bulbs than their diurnal counterparts. We therefore demonstrate a widespread relationship between ecology and the evolutionary development of a part of the brain. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28564375     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  Olfactory receptor repertoire size in dinosaurs.

Authors:  Graham M Hughes; John A Finarelli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A central place foraging seabird flies at right angles to the wind to jointly optimize locomotor and olfactory search efficiency.

Authors:  Francesco Ventura; Paulo Catry; Maria P Dias; Greg A Breed; Arnau Folch; José Pedro Granadeiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Primate mosaic brain evolution reflects selection on sensory and cognitive specialization.

Authors:  Alex R DeCasien; James P Higham
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Comparative analysis of classic brain component sizes in relation to flightiness in birds.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Michael A Weston; Randall W Robinson; Patrick-Jean Guay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Difficulties when using video playback to investigate social cognition in California scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica).

Authors:  Katharina F Brecht; Ljerka Ostojić; Edward W Legg; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Comparative Brain Morphology of the Greenland and Pacific Sleeper Sharks and its Functional Implications.

Authors:  Kara E Yopak; Bailey C McMeans; Christopher G Mull; Kirk W Feindel; Kit M Kovacs; Christian Lydersen; Aaron T Fisk; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Neuroanatomical differentiation associated with alternative reproductive tactics in male arid land bees, Centris pallida and Amegilla dawsoni.

Authors:  Meghan Barrett; Sophi Schneider; Purnima Sachdeva; Angelina Gomez; Stephen Buchmann; Sean O'Donnell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: evidence for a well-developed sense of smell in birds?

Authors:  Silke S Steiger; Andrew E Fidler; Mihai Valcu; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The giant pouched rat (Cricetomys ansorgei) olfactory receptor repertoire.

Authors:  Angela R Freeman; Alexander G Ophir; Michael J Sheehan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Back to the light, coevolution between vision and olfaction in the "Dark-flies" (Drosophila melanogaster).

Authors:  Ismet Özer; Thomas Carle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.