Literature DB >> 28564301

PATERNITY ANALYSIS IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF ASCLEPIAS EXALTATA: MULTIPLE PATERNITY, FUNCTIONAL GENDER, AND THE "POLLEN-DONATION HYPOTHESIS".

Steven B Broyles1, Robert Wyatt1.   

Abstract

Recently, some evolutionary biologists have argued that selection on the male component of fitness shapes the evolution of reproductive characters in angiosperms. Floral features, such as inflorescence size, that lead to increased insect visitation without a concomitant increase in seed production are viewed as adaptations to enhance the probability of fathering seeds on other plants. In tests of this "pollen donation hypothesis," male reproductive success has usually been measured indirectly by flower production, pollinator visitation, or pollen removal. We tested the pollen donation hypothesis directly by quantifying the number of seeds sired by individual genotypes in a natural population of poke milkweed, Asclepias exaltata, in southwestern Virginia. Multiple paternity was low within fruits, a fact which allowed us to use genotypes of progeny arrays to identify a unique pollen parent for 85% of the fruits produced in the population. Seeds sired (male success) and seeds produced (female success) were significantly correlated with flower number per plant (for male success, r = 0.32, P > 0.05; for female success, r = 0.66, P > 0.001). While the number of pollinaria removed, the usual estimator of male success in milkweeds, was highly correlated with numbers of seeds sired (r = 0.47; P > 0.001), it was even more highly correlated with numbers of seeds produced (r = 0.71, P > 0.001). Analysis of functional gender indicated that plants with many flowers did not behave primarily as males. In fact, individuals with the highest total reproductive success contributed equally as males and females. Furthermore, estimates of gender based on numbers of flowers produced or pollinaria removed overestimated the number of functional males in the population. In pollen-limited species, such as many milkweeds, proportional increases in both male and female reproductive success indicate the potential for selection to shape the evolution of large floral displays through both male and female functions. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28564301     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03838.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Apparent vs. effective mating in an experimental population of Raphanus sativus.

Authors:  Tia-Lynn Ashman; Laura F Galloway; Maureen L Stanton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Estimating the costs of allocation to male and female functions in a monoecious cucurbit, Lagenaria siceraria.

Authors:  Véronique A Delesalle; Peter D Mooreside
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Linking pollinator efficiency to patterns of pollen limitation: small bees exploit the plant-pollinator mutualism.

Authors:  Matthew H Koski; Jennifer L Ison; Ashley Padilla; Angela Q Pham; Laura F Galloway
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Pollination intensity and paternity in flowering plants.

Authors:  Dorothy A Christopher; Randall J Mitchell; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Variation in resource limitation of plant reproduction influences natural selection on floral traits of Asclepias syriaca.

Authors:  Christina M Caruso; Davin L D Remington; Kate E Ostergren
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  How pollinator-mediated mating varies with population size in plants.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Fritz; L Anders Nilsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A draft genome and transcriptome of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) as resources for evolutionary, ecological, and molecular studies in milkweeds and Apocynaceae.

Authors:  Kevin Weitemier; Shannon C K Straub; Mark Fishbein; C Donovan Bailey; Richard C Cronn; Aaron Liston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Direct evidence supporting Darwin's hypothesis of cross-pollination promoted by sex organ reciprocity.

Authors:  Violeta I Simón-Porcar; A Jesús Muñoz-Pajares; Alejandra de Castro; Juan Arroyo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 10.323

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.