Literature DB >> 28564300

HYBRIDS AND PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS I. PATTERNS OF CHARACTER EXPRESSION IN HYBRIDS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR CLADISTIC ANALYSIS.

Lucinda McDade1.   

Abstract

Interspecific hybridization is considered common among plants, but the methods of cladistic systematics produce only divergently branching phylogenetic hypotheses and thus cannot give the correct phylogeny if an analysis includes hybrids. Empirical studies of the impact of known hybrids on phylogenetic analysis are lacking, and are necessary to begin to understand the problems that we face if hybrids are often included in cladistic analysis. Examination of the implications of hybrids for cladistics must begin with patterns of character expression in hybrids. This study includes 17 hybrids and their nine parental taxa that are Central American species of Aphelandra (Acanthaceae), analyzed using a set of 50 morphological characters. The hybrids are overwhelmingly intermediate as quantitatively scored for phylogenetic analysis. They express maternal and paternal, and primitive and derived characters in equal frequencies, showing no evidence of predominant inheritance of derived character states as has been assumed by most cladists who have considered hybrids theoretically. Because of their known genetic constitution, hybrids were useful in homology assessment and ordering character states. The parental character set was generally robust, but some changes were made to reflect the special evidence offered by the hybrids. These hybrids suggest that the inclusion of hybrids in phylogenetic analysis will not lead to unresolved cladograms with rampant homoplasy, as has been predicted by other authors. Instead, the patterns of character inheritance in these hybrids lead to the prediction that a hybrid will be placed by phylogenetic analysis as a basal lineage to the clade that includes its most derived parent, with relatively little effect on homoplasy. These predictions will be evaluated by incorporation of the hybrids in phylogenetic analyses, to be reported in a subsequent paper. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Year:  1990        PMID: 28564300     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03856.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution.

Authors:  E D Soltis; P S Soltis
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Evolution by hybridisation. The influence of reticulate evolution on biosymmetrical patterns and processes in plants.

Authors:  Volker Wissemann
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.919

3.  Polymorphism and concerted evolution in a tandemly repeated gene family: 5S ribosomal DNA in diploid and allopolyploid cottons.

Authors:  R C Cronn; X Zhao; A H Paterson; J F Wendel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Phenotype and animal domestication: A study of dental variation between domestic, wild, captive, hybrid and insular Sus scrofa.

Authors:  Allowen Evin; Keith Dobney; Renate Schafberg; Joseph Owen; Una Strand Vidarsdottir; Greger Larson; Thomas Cucchi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 5.  Romance of the three domains: how cladistics transformed the classification of cellular organisms.

Authors:  Chi-Chun Ho; Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 14.870

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.