Literature DB >> 28564040

MAINTENANCE OF POLYGENIC VARIATION IN SPATIALLY STRUCTURED POPULATIONS: ROLES FOR LOCAL MATING AND GENETIC REDUNDANCY.

David B Goldstein1, Kent E Holsinger1.   

Abstract

Although heritable genetic variation is critical to the evolutionary process, we know little about how it is maintained. Obviously, mutation-selection balance must play a role, but there is considerable doubt over whether it can account for heritabilities as high as 0.5, which are commonly found in natural populations. Most models of mutation-selection balance assume panmictic populations. In this paper we use Monte Carlo simulations to examine the effect of isolation by distance on the variation maintained by mutation in a polygenic trait subject to optimizing selection. We show that isolation by distance can substantially increase the total variation maintained in continuous populations over a wide range of dispersal patterns, but only if more than one genotype produces the optimal phenotype (genetic redundancy). Isolation by distance alone has only a slight effect on the variation maintained in the total population for neutral alleles. The combined effect of isolation by distance and genetic redundancy, however, allows the maintenance of substantial variation despite strong stabilizing selection. The mechanism is straightforward. Isolation by distance allows mutation and drift to operate independently in different parts of the population. Because of their independent evolutionary histories, different parts of the population independently draw from the available set of redundant genotypes. Because the genotypes are redundant, selection does not discriminate among them, and they will persist until eliminated by drift. The population as a whole maintains many distinct genotypes. We show that this process allows mutation to maintain high levels of variation, even under strong stabilizing selection, and that over a moderate range of dispersal patterns the amount of variation maintained in the entire population is independent of both the strength of selection and the variance of the dispersal distance. Furthermore, we show that individual heterozygosity is increased in locally mating populations when selection is strong. Finally, our simulations provide a rough picture of how selection and the dispersal pattern influence the spatial distribution of genetic and phenotypic variation. © 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene flow; polygenic variation; population structure

Year:  1992        PMID: 28564040     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Genome-wide signatures of synergistic epistasis during parallel adaptation in a Baltic Sea copepod.

Authors:  David B Stern; Nathan W Anderson; Juanita A Diaz; Carol Eunmi Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 2.  Finding the Genomic Basis of Local Adaptation: Pitfalls, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sean Hoban; Joanna L Kelley; Katie E Lotterhos; Michael F Antolin; Gideon Bradburd; David B Lowry; Mary L Poss; Laura K Reed; Andrew Storfer; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Raymond Tobler; Viola Nolte; Ana Marija Jakšić; François Mallard; Kathrin Anna Otte; Marlies Dolezal; Thomas Taus; Robert Kofler; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Evolution of polygenic traits under global vs local adaptation.

Authors:  Sam Yeaman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Population differentiation of polygenic score predictions under stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Sivan Yair; Graham Coop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Distinct Patterns of Selective Sweep and Polygenic Adaptation in Evolve and Resequence Studies.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Quantifying how constraints limit the diversity of viable routes to adaptation.

Authors:  Sam Yeaman; Aleeza C Gerstein; Kathryn A Hodgins; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Polygenic Selection within a Single Generation Leads to Subtle Divergence among Ecological NichesINc.

Authors:  Moritz A Ehrlich; Dominique N Wagner; Marjorie F Oleksiak; Douglas L Crawford
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.065

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.