Literature DB >> 28563419

THE EFFECT OF INVESTMENT IN ATTRACTIVE STRUCTURES ON ALLOCATION TO MALE AND FEMALE FUNCTIONS IN PLANTS.

D Charlesworth1, B Charlesworth1.   

Abstract

Expressions for male and female fitnesses of partially self-fertilizing cosexual plants are derived, assuming that allocation to pollinator attraction at the time of flowering may decrease resources available for male and female primary structures. The total female fertility is assumed to be controlled by factors at two stages, flowering-time and fruiting-time, with resources for fruit maturation being limited so that maximum seed production may be limited by the availability of these resources. The fitness formulas are used to calculate ESS (evolutionarily stable strategy) allocations at flowering time to primary male and female sex functions and to attractive structures. These are compared with some data that are available for dry weights of different flower parts. The fitnesses of unisexual mutant forms are calculated, assuming that they are introduced into a population consisting mostly of the initial cosexual form and that they obey the same gain curves as that form. When compared with the fitness of the ESS cosexual form, this enables one to ask whether unisexual forms will be favored. We show that the spread of females is unlikely, unless there is high inbreeding depression and a rather high selfing rate, and that in some circumstances a linear relation between number of fertilized ovules and number of seeds matured can be less favorable for the invasion of females than is a highly concave relation. With a nearly linear relation between numbers of fertilized ovules and mature seeds, invasion by females is more likely when investment in attraction is low than when it is high. These effects are discussed in relation to the distribution of dioecy. The spread of male mutants is never likely in these models. © 1987 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 28563419     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05869.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Sex in advertising: dioecy alters the net benefits of attractiveness in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae).

Authors:  Jana C Vamosi; Steven M Vamosi; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor behavior in Campanula americana.

Authors:  S G Johnson; L F Delph; C L Elderkin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Carpels as leaves: meeting the carbon cost of reproduction in an alpine buttercup.

Authors:  Candace Galen; Todd E Dawson; Maureen L Stanton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica: sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and nutrient flux.

Authors:  Martin L Cipollini; Edmund W Stiles
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Rates and pattern of ovule abortion vis-à-vis in situ pollen germination in some populations of Trifolium fragiferum L.

Authors:  Meenakshi Koul; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Could seasonally deteriorating environments favour the evolution of autogamous selfing and a drought escape physiology through indirect selection? A test of the time limitation hypothesis using artificial selection in Clarkia.

Authors:  Simon K Emms; Alisa A Hove; Leah S Dudley; Susan J Mazer; Amy S Verhoeven
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Reproductive effort in desert versus mediterranean crucifers: the allogamous Erucaria rostrata and E. hispanica and the autogamous Erophila minima.

Authors:  M Boaz; U Plitmann; C C Heyn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Bee pollination increases yield quantity and quality of cash crops in Burkina Faso, West Africa.

Authors:  Katharina Stein; Drissa Coulibaly; Kathrin Stenchly; Dethardt Goetze; Stefan Porembski; André Lindner; Souleymane Konaté; Eduard K Linsenmair
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Kin discrimination allows plants to modify investment towards pollinator attraction.

Authors:  Rubén Torices; José M Gómez; John R Pannell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Influence of plant size on female-biased sex allocation in a single-flowered, nectarless herb.

Authors:  Ying-Ze Xiong; Meng Xie; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.