Literature DB >> 28562501

Collaborative Clinical Reasoning-A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.

Jan Kiesewetter1, Frank Fischer, Martin R Fischer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health care delivery involves multiple health professions, and increasingly, diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are made through interprofessional teamwork. We define collaborative clinical reasoning (CCR) as the process in which two or more health care team members negotiate diagnostic, therapeutic, or prognostic issues of an individual patient resulting in an illness or treatment plan (and to reduce uncertainty). In a systematic review, we aimed to answer the following research question: Which empirically observable factors are considered crucial influences on performance in CCR in current empirical research?
METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted. We included empirical studies taking place in a hospital setting, with a clear focus on CCR and published between January 1990 and September 2014. The studies were only included when at least one physician was part of the team. Nine articles were included in the review.
RESULTS: The factors crucially influencing the CCR performance (ie, diagnosis or treatment plan of patients) are (1) the initial distribution of information over team members, (2) clinical experience of physicians within a team, (3) information exchange within a team, and (4) individual retrieval of information from the team or information representation. DISCUSSION: Despite the sparse empirical evidence on CCR, four factors influencing performance were extracted from the literature. Overall, there is little evidence though how each of these factors actually influences CCR performance. Thus, we need more empirical studies to better understand and foster CCR performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28562501     DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  7 in total

1.  Collaborative clinical simulation in cardiologic emergency scenarios for medical students. An exploratory study on model applicability and assessment instruments.

Authors:  Sergio Guinez-Molinos; Carmen Gomar-Sancho
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Medical knowledge and teamwork predict the quality of case summary statements as an indicator of clinical reasoning in undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Sophie Fürstenberg; Viktor Oubaid; Pascal O Berberat; Martina Kadmon; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 3.  Whether two heads are better than one is the wrong question (though sometimes they are).

Authors:  Wolf E Hautz; Stefanie C Hautz; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Implementing Remote Collaboration in a Virtual Patient Platform: Usability Study.

Authors:  Jan Kiesewetter; Inga Hege; Michael Sailer; Elisabeth Bauer; Claudia Schulz; Manfred Platz; Martin Adler
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  Increasing Reasoning Awareness: Video Analysis of Students' Two-Party Virtual Patient Interactions.

Authors:  Samuel Edelbring; Ioannis Parodis; Ingrid E Lundberg
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2018-02-27

6.  Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact.

Authors:  Jan Kiesewetter; Michael Sailer; Valentina M Jung; Regina Schönberger; Elisabeth Bauer; Jan M Zottmann; Inga Hege; Hanna Zimmermann; Frank Fischer; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Learning to diagnose collaboratively: validating a simulation for medical students.

Authors:  Anika Radkowitsch; Martin R Fischer; Ralf Schmidmaier; Frank Fischer
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.