Julia Huina Sng1, Yiying Pei2, Ying Pin Toh2, Tan Ying Peh3,4, Shirlyn Huishan Neo3,4, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna3,4,5. 1. a Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine , National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore. 2. b Assisi Hospice , Singapore , Singapore. 3. c Division of Palliative Medicine , National Cancer Centre Singapore , Singapore , Singapore. 4. d Duke-NUS Medical School , Singapore , Singapore. 5. e Centre for Biomedical Ethics , National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mentoring relationships are pivotal to the outcome of the mentoring process. This thematic review seeks to study the key aspects of mentoring relationships between senior physicians and junior doctors and/or medical students to inform efforts to improve mentoring programs. METHODS: Literature search was performed on publications across PubMed, ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, OVID and ScienceDirect databases between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015 by three independent reviewers. The BEME guide and STORIES statement were used to develop a narrative from the articles selected. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of 49 articles reveals five semantic themes of initiation process, developmental process, evaluation process, sustaining mentoring relationship, and obstacles to effective mentoring. The evolving and relational-dependent nature of mentoring pivots upon the compatibility of mentors and mentees and the quality of their interactions, which in turn depend on mentoring environments and awareness of mentor-, mentee-, organizational-related factors and changes in context and goals. CONCLUSIONS: Embrace of a consistent mentoring approach to ensure effective oversight of the mentoring process must be balanced with sufficient flexibility to ensure a mentee-centered approach. Efforts must be made to optimize the key aspects of mentoring relationships in order to ensure successful mentoring processes and outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Mentoring relationships are pivotal to the outcome of the mentoring process. This thematic review seeks to study the key aspects of mentoring relationships between senior physicians and junior doctors and/or medical students to inform efforts to improve mentoring programs. METHODS: Literature search was performed on publications across PubMed, ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, OVID and ScienceDirect databases between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015 by three independent reviewers. The BEME guide and STORIES statement were used to develop a narrative from the articles selected. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of 49 articles reveals five semantic themes of initiation process, developmental process, evaluation process, sustaining mentoring relationship, and obstacles to effective mentoring. The evolving and relational-dependent nature of mentoring pivots upon the compatibility of mentors and mentees and the quality of their interactions, which in turn depend on mentoring environments and awareness of mentor-, mentee-, organizational-related factors and changes in context and goals. CONCLUSIONS: Embrace of a consistent mentoring approach to ensure effective oversight of the mentoring process must be balanced with sufficient flexibility to ensure a mentee-centered approach. Efforts must be made to optimize the key aspects of mentoring relationships in order to ensure successful mentoring processes and outcomes.
Authors: Jia Min Hee; Hong Wei Yap; Zheng Xuan Ong; Simone Qian Min Quek; Ying Pin Toh; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cheryl Shumin Kow; Yao Hao Teo; Yao Neng Teo; Keith Zi Yuan Chua; Elaine Li Ying Quah; Nur Haidah Binte Ahmad Kamal; Lorraine Hui En Tan; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Yun Ting Ong; Kuang Teck Tay; Min Chiam; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 2.463