| Literature DB >> 28561794 |
Cristina Delcaru1, Paulina Podgoreanu2,3, Ionela Alexandru4,5, Nela Popescu6, Luminiţa Măruţescu7, Coralia Bleotu8, George Dan Mogoşanu9, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc10,11, Marinela Gluck12, Veronica Lazăr13,14.
Abstract
Acute bacterial prostatitis is one of the frequent complications of urinary tract infection (UTI). From the approximately 10% of men having prostatitis, 7% experience a bacterial prostatitis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of uropathogens associated with UTIs in older patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and to assess their susceptibility to commonly prescribed antibiotics as well as the relationships between microbial virulence and resistance features. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli was found to be the most frequent bacterial strain isolated from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, followed by Enterococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens. Increased resistance rates to tetracyclines, quinolones, and sulfonamides were registered. Besides their resistance profiles, the uropathogenic isolates produced various virulence factors with possible implications in the pathogenesis process. The great majority of the uropathogenic isolates revealed a high capacity to adhere to HEp-2 cell monolayer in vitro, mostly exhibiting a localized adherence pattern. Differences in the repertoire of soluble virulence factors that can affect bacterial growth and persistence within the urinary tract were detected. The Gram-negative strains produced pore-forming toxins-such as hemolysins, lecithinases, and lipases-proteases, siderophore-like molecules resulted from the esculin hydrolysis and amylases, while Enterococcus sp. strains were positive only for caseinase and esculin hydrolase. Our study demonstrates that necessity of investigating the etiology and local resistance patterns of uropathogenic organisms, which is crucial for determining appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in elderly patients with UTI, while establishing correlations between resistance and virulence profiles could provide valuable input about the clinical evolution and recurrence rates of UTI.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; biofilm; urinary tract infections
Year: 2017 PMID: 28561794 PMCID: PMC5488656 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens6020022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1Graphic representation of the antibiotic susceptibility profiles in the Gram-negative (a) and Enterococcus sp. (b) analyzed uropathogenic strains. CN: Gentamicin; FOT: Fosfomycin; F: Nitrofurantoin; SXT: Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole; TE: Tetracycline; NOR: Norfloxacin; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; CXM: Cefuroxime; CAZ: Ceftazidime; AMC: Amoxicillin–Clavulanic acid; VA: Vancomycin; LEV: Levofloxacin; E: Erythromycin; P: Penicillin; AMP: Ampicillin; R: Resistant; I: Intermediary; S: Sensitive.
Figure 2Representation of the individual profiles of soluble virulence factors and antibiotic resistance profiles in the analyzed Gram-negative strains.
Figure 3Distribution of the adherence to the cellular substratum among the analyzed uropathogenic strains.
Figure 4Graphic representation of the profile of soluble virulence factors in the analyzed strains.