Literature DB >> 28561725

Challenges in Opening and Enrolling Patients in Clinical Trials.

Julie M Vose1, Meredith K Chuk1, Francis Giles1.   

Abstract

Clinical trials are key elements of the processes that account for many of the recent advances in cancer care, including decreased mortality rates and increased survivorship; better supportive care; and improved understanding of cancer risk, prevention, and screening. This research also has led to the validation of numerous exciting new types of cancer treatments, such as molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Clinical trials, however, are becoming more and more challenging to conduct. Research programs must comply with legal and regulatory requirements that can be inefficient and costly to implement and often are variably interpreted by institutions and sponsors and sponsors' representatives, including contract research organizations. Some of these requirements are essential to protect the safety of trial participants, to promote the scientific integrity of research, or to ensure that trial conduct is efficient and adequately resourced. Such requirements are important to preserve. However, some requirements do not fulfill any of these goals and, in fact, hinder research and slow patient access to safe and effective treatments. This article discusses some of the identified issues that are slowing the process of cancer clinical trials, such as conservatively interpreted guidelines by pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations; overprotective language for contracts; and patient protections by health systems and universities. The article also discusses possible solutions to these problems that are slowing down the cancer therapies that patients need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28561725     DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_179807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book        ISSN: 1548-8748


  4 in total

Review 1.  Nano-Theranostics for the Sensing, Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancers.

Authors:  David G Calatayud; Sotia Neophytou; Eleni Nicodemou; S Giuseppe Giuffrida; Haobo Ge; Sofia I Pascu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.545

2.  ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed Rafee; Sarah Riepenhausen; Philipp Neuhaus; Alexandra Meidt; Martin Dugas; Julian Varghese
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Timelines to initiate a phase III trial across the globe: a sub-analysis of the APHINITY trial.

Authors:  Maria Alice Franzoi; Marion Procter; Chris Twelves; Noam Ponde; Daniel Eiger; Orianne Emond; Emma Clark; Damien Parlier; Sébastien Guillaume; Linda Reaby; Evandro de Azambuja; Jose Bines
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Creating and Implementing a Principal Investigator Tool Kit for Enhancing Accrual to Late Phase Clinical Trials: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Alexandra Thomas; Kristin A Higgins; Nancy Soto; Rebecca Paulus; Thomas J George; Thomas B Julian; Sharon Hartson Stine; Merry Jennifer Markham; Maria Werner-Wasik
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.