Literature DB >> 28561516

THE EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE FACTORS ON VIABILITY SELECTION IN HYLA GRATIOSA TADPOLES.

Joseph Travis1, W Hubert Keen2, John Juilianna1.   

Abstract

Two full sib families of Hyla gratiosa larvae were compared in growth rate and survival under twelve ecological conditions in field enclosures. The twelve conditions represented the independent absence or presence of two predators (nymphal dragonflies and larval salamanders) and a range of three initial tadpole densities (8, 16, 32 larvae per enclosure). This 2 × 2 × 3 design for variance analysis was replicated five times in a natural pond. The presence of either predator reduced survival levels by 24%. There was no consistent effect of tadpole density on survival. However, at low tadpole density (8 per enclosure), the presence of salamanders did not affect tadpole survival levels; effect of the salamanders was restricted to the higher densities (16 and 32 per enclosure). The combined effect on overall survival of the two predators was additive. One sibship (denoted A) consistently displayed a higher survival level than the other (denoted B). However, the level of differential survival, measured as the survival of B relative to A, varied among predator combinations. Survival differences among treatments and sibships were related to body size differences. The changing levels of differential survival between sibships did not reflect a changing level of differential body size but, rather, an ecologically mediated change in the relationship between the level of body size variation and the subsequent level of survival variation. Ecological factors such as conspecific density variation or predator abundance do not act as isolated selective pressures but, rather, interact in their effects on mortality rates. These interactions cause the value of a trait related to a fitness component to vary with ecological condition. These results suggest that a thorough understanding of how selection really does act in natural populations requires a thorough understanding of the relevant ecological factors, a point all too often unappreciated. © 1985 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 28561516     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Interactions among factors affecting growth, development and survival in experimental populations of Bufo terrestris (Anura: Bufonidae).

Authors:  Joseph Travis; Joel C Trexler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Fish predation in size-structured populations of treefrog tadpoles.

Authors:  Raymond D Semlitsch; J Whitfield Gibbons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Interaction of pH, density, and priority effects on the survivorship and growth of two species of hylid tadpoles.

Authors:  Susan C Warner; William A Dunson; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An examination of multiple factors affecting community structure in an aquatic amphibian community.

Authors:  Spencer A Cortwright; Craig E Nelson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Impact of plant cover on fitness and behavioural traits of captive red-eyed tree frogs (Agalychnis callidryas).

Authors:  Christopher J Michaels; Rachael E Antwis; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Shape variation in the least killifish: ecological associations of phenotypic variation and the effects of a common garden.

Authors:  J Alex Landy; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.