Literature DB >> 28561421

Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers.

Sara Drago1, Roger Imboden2, Philipp Schlatter1, Mirabel Buylaert1, Stephan Krähenbühl1,3, Juergen Drewe1,3.   

Abstract

Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration-time course. Twenty-four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady-state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, Cmax was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC50 values for COX-1 and COX-2, explaining the absence of dose-dependent toxicities.
© 2017 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28561421     DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  4 in total

1.  Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in transdermal β-blocker patch users is lower than that in oral β-blocker users after cardiac and/or thoracic aortic surgery.

Authors:  Homare Okamura; Mamoru Arakawa; Atsushi Miyagawa; Hideo Adachi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-02

2.  Hydration of the Carboxylate Group in Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: ATR-IR and Computational Studies of Aqueous Solution of Sodium Diclofenac.

Authors:  Elena O Levina; Nikita V Penkov; Natalia N Rodionova; Sergey A Tarasov; Daria V Barykina; Mikhail V Vener
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 3.  Expert consensus of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on pain treatment with the transdermal patch.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Wei Jiang; Yun-Xia Wang; Lin Wang; Yan Lv; Jin-Feng Liu; Rong-Guo Liu; Hui Liu; Li-Zu Xiao; Dong-Ping Du; Li-Juan Lu; Xiao-Qiu Yang; Ling-Jie Xia; Dong Huang; Zhi-Jian Fu; Bao-Gan Peng; Yan-Qing Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Lasered Graphene Microheaters Modified with Phase-Change Composites: New Approach to Smart Patch Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Victoria Gilpin; Deetchaya Surandhiran; Cameron Scott; Amy Devine; Jill H Cundell; Chris I R Gill; L Kirsty Pourshahidi; James Davis
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.523

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.