Literature DB >> 28560456

Investigation of the major cytochrome P450 1A2 genetic variant in a healthy Tibetan population in China.

Yongchao Ren1, Fang Liu2, Xugang Shi3, Tingting Geng4, Dongya Yuan3, Li Wang3, Longli Kang3, Tianbo Jin5, Chao Chen5.   

Abstract

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 gene is involved in the metabolism of several carcinogens and clinically important drugs, generating a high potential for pharmacokinetic interactions. Since no data are available for Tibetan aborigines, the present study aimed to investigate the distribution of variant CYP1A2 alleles in a population living in Tibetan region of China. Genotyping analyses of CYP1A2 were conducted in 96 unrelated, healthy volunteers of Tibetan ancestry using direct sequencing assays. A total of 14 different CYP1A2 polymorphisms, including two novel variants (1690G>A and 2896C>T) in the intron region and a novel non‑synonymous one (795G>C, Gln265His) were detected. CYP1A2*1A (6.77%), CYP1A2*1B (58.33%) and CYP1A2*1F (14.58%) were the most frequent defective alleles identified in the sample. The frequencies of the prevalent genotypes CYP1A2*1A/*1B, *1B/*1B, *1B/*1F were 13.54%, 16.67% and 29.17%, respectively. In addition, the novel non‑synonymous variant 795G>C (Gln265His) was predicted to be benign by PolyPhen‑2 and SIFT tools. The present study provides useful information on the pattern of CYP1A2 polymorphisms in Chinese Tibetan population. The current results may have potential benefits for the development of personalized medicine in the Tibetan population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28560456      PMCID: PMC5482113          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Interethnic differences in drug-metabolizing enzyme activity have been associated with inter-individual differences in the efficacy and toxicity of many medications (1). Among drug-metabolizing enzymes, the cytochrome P450 (CYP), a supergene family involved in the phase I reactions of the metabolism of several drugs and endogenous compounds, has increasingly been recognized to have clinically significant consequences (2). Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), one of the CYP enzyme isoforms, is of particular interest because it exhibits a genetic polymorphism. CYP1A2, mapped to the positive strand of the long arm of chromosome 15 at 15q24.1, is predominantly expressed in the human liver and at lower levels in intestine, pancreas, lung and brain (3). The human CYP1A2 enzyme has been demonstrated to be responsible for many commonly used drugs, including caffeine, imipramine, paracetamol, clozapine, theophylline, tacrine, phenacetin and some neurotoxins (4). In addition, CYP1A2 is known to gain further importance in the metabolic activation of numerous carcinogens (5). Therefore, any alteration to CYP1A2 activity has been suggested to be a susceptibility factor for drug metabolism and the etiology of developing cancers and other diseases (6). Like other drug metabolizing enzymes, numerous factors have been presented to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the inter-individual differences in CYP1A2 activity, such as race, gender, environmental exposure to inducers or inhibitors and genetic factors (7). With respect to genetic factors, several alleles and additional haplotype variants have been identified in coding and non-coding regions of the CYP1A2 gene, in particular in the CYP1A2 upstream sequence and the intron 1 region (CYP allele nomenclature website at http://www.cypalleles.ki.se/). The frequencies of these polymorphisms display interethnic variability particularly between those of European and East Asian ancestry (8). Tibet, as a part of China, contains a large number of high altitude populations that have a distinctive suite of physiological traits that enable them to tolerate environmental hypoxia. Because few data are available on the investigation of the CYP1A2 genotype in the Tibetan population, the aim of the present study was to determine the CYP1A2 genotype profile of a random Tibet population by screening for the main allelic variants and compare to the allelic frequencies of those previously reported from other ethnic groups. It is hoped that the results will prospectively offer a preliminary basis for more rational usage of drugs that are substrates for CYP1A2.

Materials and methods

Subjects and DNA extraction

A total of 96 unrelated Chinese healthy volunteers (48 males and 48 females) of Tibetan origin, mostly students or employees at Xizang Minzu University (Xi'an, China), were enrolled in the study. All of the individuals lived in the same region at the time of the study and were of Tibetan ancestry without any known ancestry from other ethnicities. The study protocol was approved by The Human Research Committee of Xizang Minzu University (Xi'an, China), and each volunteer gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Peripheral blood samples were collected and stored after centrifugation at −70°C until analysis, and genomic DNA was isolated and purified using a commercial blood Genomic DNA extraction kit (Xi'an GoldMag Nanobiotech Co., Ltd., Xi'an, China) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing

The primer pairs designed to amplify the 5′ flanking regions, all exons and all introns of the CYP1A2 gene are listed in Table I. The PCR was conducted in a total volume of 10 µl consisting of 1 µl genomic DNA (20 ng/µl), 0.5 µl each primer pair (5 µM), 5 µl HotStart TaqMasterMix (Qiagen China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and 3 µl deionized water. PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 15 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55–64°C for 30 sec, extension at 72°C for 1 min. The final extension step was performed at 72°C for 3 min. The PCR products were purified and sequenced on an ABI Prism 3100 sequencer (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (version, 3.1; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Table I.

Primers used for human CYP1A2 gene amplification.

RegionPrimer sequence (5′-3′)Fragment size (bp)
CYP1A2_1_FAATCGATATGGCAATCAAATGCAAA
CYP1A2_1_RCCCGTCTTTCTGTCCCCACT740
CYP1A2_2_FTAGGCTCCCTACCCTGAACC
CYP1A2_2_RAACATGAACGCTGGCTCTCT919
CYP1A2_3_FGTCACTGGGTAGGGGGAACT
CYP1A2_3_RAAGGTGTTGAGGGCATTCTG896
CYP1A2_4_FCTGGCACTGTCAAGGATGAG
CYP1A2_4_RATTGCAGGACTCTGCTAGGG909
CYP1A2_5_FCAGGACTTTGACAAGGTGAGC
CYP1A2_5_RCATAGCCCAGGCTCAAACC912
CYP1A2_6_FCCTGTTCAAGCACAGCAAGA
CYP1A2_6_RAACACAGAGGACAAGCAGAGC903
CYP1A2_7_FCCTGTTATGTGCCTGCTGTG
CYP1A2_7_RGGGGATTCAGGCCTCTTACT899
CYP1A2_8_FTCCCAGTGCCCTCTGTGCCA
CYP1A2_8_RGCCTTCCTGACTGCTGAACCTGC848
CYP1A2_9_FAACAGCCAAGTGCGCAGCCA
CYP1A2_9_RTCGCCTGAGGTACCCCACCT881
CYP1A2_10_FAGGTGGGGTACCTCAGGCGA
CYP1A2_10_RGAGGTGCCTGGGGGAGGGAG930
CYP1A2_11_FTTTGGTTCCTTCCCACCTACCCTT
CYP1A2_11_RGAAGAGAAACAAGGGCTGAGTCCCC511
CYP1A2_12_FTGCTGTTTGGCATGGGCAAG
CYP1A2_12_RTCTGGTGATGGTTGCACAATTC926
CYP1A2_13_FAGAATTGTGCAACCATCACCAGAA
CYP1A2_13_RCCAGTCTCAGGACTCAAGCACCA921

CYP, cytochrome P450.

Statistical analysis

The sequences were edited and assembled using Sequencher software (version, 4.10.1; Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Allele nomenclature was assigned according to the Human Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Allele Nomenclature Committee (http://www.cypalleles.ki.se/). Differences in allele frequencies between Tibet and other ethnic populations were measured by Fisher exact test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The observed genotype frequencies of CYP1A2 were also estimated by the Hardy Weinberg law for the predicted frequencies. The linkage equilibrium (LD) coefficient (D') between each genetic variant was analyzed by Haploview software (version, 4.1; Daley Lab at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA).

Protein prediction of novel mutations

PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/) and SIFT (http://blocks.fhcrc.org/sift/SIFT.html) software were performed to predict the effect of missense variants on the protein function. Based on the SIFT score, SIFT scores ≤0.05 were predicted by the algorithm to be evolutionary conservation and intolerance to substitution, whereas scores >0.05 were considered tolerant (not likely to affect protein function) (9). The PolyPhen-2 score ranges from 0 to 1, and PolyPhen-2 scores >0.85, between 0.85 and 0.15, and <0.15 were coded as ‘probably damaging’, ‘possibly damaging’ and ‘benign’, respectively (10).

Results

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery

In the current study, the authors used direct sequencing to analyze sequence variation within the CYP1A2 gene among 96 healthy Tibetans. The analyses covered the proximal promoter region, all exons as well as surrounding intronic regions and variable lengths of the flanking regions. Table II presented all the CYP1A2 mutation variations in this population. The most frequent polymorphism was the C-163A change in intron 1 which had 88.54% frequency, followed by G2321C change in intron 4 which had 37.5% frequency and T-739G change in intron 1 which had 20.83% frequency in the healthy group. Both 2159G>A and 5347C>T had similar results (13.5%), correspondingly. Additionally, among a total of 14 nucleotide variants detected, the authors detected three novel CYP1A2 variants (795G>C, 1690G>A and 2896C>T) in exon 2 and intron 5 region with minor allele frequency of 1.04%, of which one variant (795G>C) resulted in an amino acid change from glutamine to histidine at position 265.
Table II.

CYP1A2 polymorphisms and their frequencies in a Chinese Tibetan population.

PolymorphismLocationFlanking sequenceMinor alleleCYP nomenclatureReference dbSNPAmino acid translationPredicted effect on protein structure/function using PolyPhenFrequency (%)
−739T>GIntron 1GGTGTAGGGG K CCTGAGTTCCGCYP1A2*1E/*1G/*1Jrs2069526/20.83
−163C>AIntron 1CTCTGTGGGC M CAGGACGCATACYP1A2*1F/*1J/*1Krs762551/88.54
223G>AExon 2CTACGGGGAC R TCCTGCAGATArs150164960Val75IleBenign1.04
795G>CExon 2GGTTCCTGCA S AAAACAGTCCCNovelNovelGln265HisBenign1.04
1202C>TIntron 2TTCACACTAA Y CTTTTCCTTCTrs4646425/9.38
1514G>AExon 3TAGAGCCAGC R GCAACCTCATACYP1A2*13rs35796837Gly299SerBenign3.13
1690G>AIntron 3ACAACATACT R AGATCTGGCTANovelNovel/1.04
2159G>AIntron 4GAAGCCTTGA R ACCCAGGTTGACYP1A2*1M/*1Q/*17rs2472304/13.54
2321G>CIntron 4TGGGGTATAA S AGGGGATAATCrs3743484/37.50
2410G>AExon 5AGGGAGCGGC R GCCCCGGCTCArs55918015Arg356GlnBenign4.17
2896C>TIntron 5AATGCCGACA Y GAGCTTCCTCTNovelNovel/1.04
3613T>CIntron 6GAACTGTTTA Y ATAATGAAAGCrs4646427/9.38
5112C>TExon 7GCCGATGGCA Y TGCCATTAACTCYP1A2*14rs45486893Thr438IlePossibly damaging9.38
5347C>TExon 7TCTCCATCAA Y TGAAGAAGACTCYP1A2*1B/*1G/*1Hrs2470890Asn516=13.54

CYP, cytochrome P450; dbSNP, The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database.

Allele & genotype frequencies

A total of eight different CYP1A2 alleles and genotypes were determined based on the polymorphisms identified in the current study (Table III). Hardy-Weinberg equilibriums were assessed and all CYP1A2 allele and genotype frequencies were in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The wild-type allele, CYP1A2* 1A, with a frequency of 6.77%, was classified as normal enzyme activity. Besides the wild-type allele, CYP1A2* 1B (58.33%) and CYP1A2*1F (14.58%) were the best-characterized defect alleles in the Chinese Tibetan population, of which CYP1A2*1F alleles were putatively linked to higher inducibility of the enzyme. CYP1A2*1G, CYP1A2*1J, CYP1A2*1M, CYP1A2*13 and CYP1A2*14 alleles have been included in the table, as these were the most scarce alleles in the study population. They occurred at a frequency of 1.56–5.21% in the current study population.
Table III.

Allele and genotype frequencies of CYP1A2 variants in Chinese Tibetan subjects.

AlleleTotal (n=192)PhenotypeFrequency (%)
*1A  13Normal6.771
*1B112/58.333
*1F  28Higher inducibility14.583
*1G  10/5.208
*1J  10/5.208
*1M  7/3.646
*13  3/1.563
*14  9/4.688

GenotypeTotal (n=96)PhenotypeFrequency (%)

*1A/*1B13/13.542
*1B/*1B16  Higher activity16.667
*1B/*1F28/29.167
*1B/*1G10/10.417
*1B/*1J10/10.417
*1B/*1M  7/7.292
*1B/*13  3/3.125
*1B/*14  9/9.375
In relation to genotypes, the most frequent genotypes were * 1A/* 1B (13.54%), * 1B/* 1B (16.67%) and * 1B/* 1F (29.17%) (Table III). All five other genotypes presented frequencies of <10.5% in the study. In addition, individuals with the * 1B/* 1B genotype have been associated with a higher activity of the enzyme.

Interethnic variability

In order to better understand the occurrence and distributional patterns of the common mutation allele amongst different ethnic groups, the data were compared with those from previous investigations in different countries and ethnic groups in Caucasians, Africans, Arabs and Asians (Table IV). C-163A (88.54%) was most frequent among the Tibetan population, when compared with T-739 G (20.83%) and C5347T (13.54%). The allele frequency of C-163A and T-739G was significantly higher than that in Caucasians, Africans, Arabs and Asians, but allelic distributions of C-163A were relatively equal to that in Malays (78%), and T-739G was relatively similar to Tunisia (13.5%), Southern Chinese (9.3%) and Indians (10%). For C5347T, Tibetans demonstrated a relatively lower frequency of mutation compared with Caucasians (48–64.4%), but was similar to that in Africans (20.9%) and Asians (12.0–20.4%) with the only exception of South Asians (35%), which was significantly higher than Tibetans.
Table IV.

Distribution of mutant allele frequencies of CYP1A2 −739T>G, −163C>A and 5347C>T in different ethnicities.

Ethnic groupStudy population no.−163C>A (*1F/*1J/*1K)−739T>G (*1E/*1G/*1J)5347C>T (*1B/*1H/*1G)Reference
Tibetan9688.5420.8313.54Present study
Caucasian
  British6566.2[b]0.77[b]NDPMID: 12534642
  Bulgarian13872.0[b]NDNDPMID: 18021343
  Caucasian49568.2[b]1.6[b]NDPMID: 16307269
  Caucasian19473.7[b]4.1[b]64.4[b]PMID: 18231117
  Caucasian23668.0[b]NDNDPMID: 10233211
  Costa Rican93260.0[b]NDNDPMID: 15466009
  European16669.0[b]5.0[b]48.0[b]PMID: 22948892
  German15068.0[b]NDNDPMID: 21918647
  Hawaiian19471.4[b]NDNDPMID: 12925300
  Hungarian39668.6[b]NDNDPMID: 25461540
  Italian9566.8[b]NDNDPMID: 16188490
  Roman40456.9[b]NDNDPMID: 25461540
  Serbian262–26461.1[b]3.4[b]NDPMID: 20390257
  Swedish19471.4[b]2.3[b]NDPMID: 17370067
  Swedish117071.0[b]NDNDPMID: 12445029
  Spanish1172.0[b]2.0[b]NDPMID: 12920202
  Swiss10068.0[b]NDNDPMID: 12851801
  Turkish10173.2[b]1.0[b]NDPMID: 20797314
  Turkish11073.0[b]1.0[b]NDPMID: 18825963
  Turkish14666.8[b]4.8[b]49.7[b]PMID: 19450128
African
  Ethiopia17360.0[b]10.0[a]NDPMID: 12920202
  Ethiopia50–39151.3[b]6.6[a]20.9PMID: 20881513 a genomic biography of the gene behind the human drugmetabolizing enzyme
  Tanzanian7149.0[b]NDNDPMID: 15387446
  Tunisia9844.0[b]13.5NDPMID: 19332078
  Tunisia2759.3[b]NDNDPMID: 25921178
  South African98361.0[b]NDNDPMID: 22118051
  Ovambo17746.0[b]NDNDPMID: 16933202
  Zimbabwean14357.0[b]NDNDPMID: 15387446
Arab
  Egyptian21268.0[b]3.0[b]NDPMID: 12630986
  Saudi Arabian13610.0[b]10.0[a]NDPMID: 12920202
  Jordanian550–56067.3[b]6.0[b]NDPMID: 22426036
Asian
  Zhejiang4357.0[b]NDNDPMID: 25117321
Chinese
  Chinese38–4271.0[a]4.0[a]12.0PMID: 20930417
  Chinese16867.0[b]NDNDPMID: 11470995
  Chinese7966.0[b]NDNDPMID: 12445035
  Chinese20069.3[b]10.4[a]15.3PMID: 18231117
  South2770.4[a]9.320.4PMID: 16153396
Chinese
  Taiwan204–20835.0[b]9.7[b]14.0PMID: 21121774
  Indians41–4258.0[b]10.012.0PMID: 20930417
  Malays38–4278.07.0[a]18.0PMID: 20930417
  Mongolian15321.2[b]NDNDPMID: 16933202
  Japanese16070.0[b]1.9[b]18.7PMID: 18231117
  Japanese25062.8[b]3.2[b]19.2PMID: 15770072
  Japanese15961.3[b]8.2[b]NDPMID: 10551315
  Korean15062.7[b]2.7[b]NDPMID: 17370067
  Korean101562.5[b]NDNDPMID: 19579025
  Korean25031.6[b]NDNDPMID: 16933202
  Korean160–18666.1[b]5.4[b]18.3PMID: 18231117
  South Asian16638.0[b]6.0[b]35.0[b]PMID: 22948892

ND, not determined.

P<0.05 vs. the Tibetan population

P<0.01 vs. the Tibetan population.

LD analysis

To identify relationships between the SNPs identified in the polymorphism screening, linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was evaluated in Haploview (http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/) using coefficient of linkage disequilibrium D' values (Fig. 1). Even though no distinct LD blocks or extended haplotypes could be detected in the sequenced data, some SNPs were identified (−739T>G and 1202C>T, −163C>A and 2321G>C, 1202C>T and 3613T>C, −739T>G and 3613T>C, −739T>G and 5112C>T) seemed to be linked with high D'.
Figure 1.

Linkage disequilibrium analysis of CYP1A2. LD is displayed by standard color schemes, with bright red for very strong LD (LOD >2, D'=1), pink red (LOD >2, D'<1) and blue (LOD <2, D'=1) for intermediate LD, and white (LOD <2, D'<1) for no LD. LD linkage equilibrium; LOD, logarithm of odds score; D', coefficient of linkage disequilibrium.

Protein function prediction of non-synonymous mutation

The SIFT scores for the amino acid substitutions Val75Ile (223G>A), Gln265His (novel variant 795G>C), Gly299Ser (1514G>A) and Arg356Gln (2410G>A), ranged between 0.07 and 0.72 and were predicted as being tolerated. In contrast, the Thr438Ile (5112C>T) mutations gave SIFT scores of 0.00, predicting they were highly likely to affect protein function. To validate the prediction of SIFT scores, the PolyPhen-2 algorithm was used to predict variations Val75Ile, Gln265His, Gly299Ser and Arg356Gln as benign with scores of 0.415, 0.039, 0.045 and 0.002, respectively, and Thr438Ile as possibly damaging, with a score of 0.281. Four substitutions (Gln265His, Gly299Ser, Arg356Gln and Thr438Ile) were consistently computationally predicted using both PolyPhen-2 and SIFT, while Val75Ile was not consistent. The protein function prediction of variants 5112C>T and 795G>C (novel variant) is presented Fig. 2 (PolyPhen-2).
Figure 2.

Protein prediction of the variants 795G>C (novel mutation) and 5112C>T using the PolyPhen-2 tool. (A) Prediction of the novel mutation 795G>C (B) Prediction of the variant 5112C>T.

Discussion

CYP1A2, one of the major P450 isoforms, accounts for ~5–20% of the total hepatic CYP content and contributes to the metabolism of 10% of clinically relevant drugs, including clozapine and caffeine (3). It has been demonstrated that CYP1A2 activity has been influenced by the presence of polymorphic variants, which displays wide interindividual and interethnic variability. In the present study, the CYP1A2 gene polymorphisms were systematically screened in 96 healthy Chinese Tibetan subjects. To the best of the authors' knowledge, these efforts are the first to investigate allelic variants of CYP1A2 among the Tibetan population to date. A total of 14 SNPs were detected in the current study. There were eight SNPs detected in the intron region. The −163 C>A (* 1F/* 1J/* 1K/* 1M allele) in intron 1 is the most common CYP1A2 polymorphism in various population studies (Table IV). In Tibetans, −163C>A is the most frequently observed SNP, with an overall frequency of 88.54%, which is significantly higher than that in Caucasians, Africans, Arabs and Asians (except Malays). Possible explanations for these differences include: Genetic background, cultural variants and other factors, such as living environment, medication use, body composition and dietary habits (11,12). In addition, much confusion and controversy still arises as to the available data in literature about the functional consequences and allele frequencies of CYP1A2 variants, mainly because of limitation of sample size and the differing designations of the CYP1A2* 1F allele (defined as having-163A by The HumanCytochrome P450 Allele Nomenclature Committee). Sachse et al (4) first reported that smokers homozygous for the C-allele had, on average, 40% lower CYP1A2 activity in comparison with those with the A/A genotype. In contrast, some inconsistent studies have reported that CYP1A2 * 1F mutation was associated with a high inducibility of CYP1A2 in smokers as well as in nonsmokers (13). It is tempting to speculate the divergence may be the possibility of the −163C>A occurring in linkage disequilibrium with another mutation that is responsible for the increased CYP1A2 inducibility (14). The present study identified a strong linkage disequilibrium between −163C>A and 2321G>C polymorphisms (Fig. 1), providing researchers in the field with abundant clues, however, more studies are required to shed more light on this idea. Another most prevalent polymorphism in intron 1 region, −739T>G, was first reported in in a Japanese population (5). −739T>G is located on the CYP1A2* 1E, * 1G, * 1J or * 1K allele, and previous research demonstrated that this polymorphism has no effect on the enzyme activity (6). −739T>G is the most common variant among Asians and the frequency of 20.83% found in the present study is significantly higher than other Asians (Table IV), Caucasians (0.77–5%) (6,8), Africans (6.6–13.5%) (15,16) and Arabs studied elsewhere (3–10%) (17,18). Interethnic differences in the prevalence of −739T>G may be one of the major factors to consider in large pharmacogenetic studies and clinical applications in populations of Asian ancestry, such as Chinese Tibetans, since the proportion of high expressers due to the presence of −739T>G varies depending on the ethnic background. Among the six SNPs identified in the exons, the synonymous 5347T>G (* 1B/* 1G/* 1H), was the most common variant among Caucasians and the frequency of 13.54% identified in the present study presented a frequency significantly lower than Caucasians, but it was quite similar to Asians (except South Asians) (Table IV). This may be because these populations are distributed in different geographical regions, which may result in the formation of numerous, small, genetically isolated groups. In the tested Chinese Tibetan population, CYP1A2* 1A is referred to as the wild-type allele with a frequency of 6.77%, which is significantly less when compared with Swedes (24.4%), Koreans (21.7%), Japanese (34.8%), Caucasians (33.4%) and Serbs (33.4%) (19–21). The occurrence of the most prevalent defective alleles, CYP1A2* 1B (5347T>G), evaluated in Chinese Tibetan subjects (58.3%) in the present study is slightly lower compared to the occurrence reported in Caucasians (61.8%), but is higher than other Chinese population (20.4%) (22). However, the genotype frequencies observed for * 1B, * 1B in Tibetans (16.67%) was slightly higher than that in Caucasian (6.19%), Japanese (7.5%), Korean (10.75%) and other Chinese population (9%). Currently, only Chen et al (22) reported that CYP1A2*1B homozygotes demonstrated marginally higher CYP1A2 activity, when compared with CYP1A2* 1A/* 1A homozygotes (22). Because the * 1B, * 1B genotype is relatively common in Chinese Tibetan subjects, this genotype may have a major influence in altered CYP1A2 activity, of course, this requires further investigation. CYP1A2* 1F resulted from a C>A substitution at −163 in intron 1 of the promoter region. The haplotype *1F allele is common with high and comparable frequencies in various studies. However, the frequencies of CYP1A2* 1F (−163A allele) in Tibetans is 14.58%, which was far less frequent compared with Caucasians (73.7%) (23), Africans (61%) (24), Arabs (68%) (17) and Asians (69.3%) (23). Since CYP1A2* 1F is reported to be associated with an effect on enzyme inducibility, the estimates of their frequencies in the Tibetan population may be of extreme importance. Compared with the alleles CYP1A2* 1B and CYP1A2* 1F, * 1G, * 1J, * 1M, * 13 and * 14 are relatively rare in Tibetans, thus the clinical applicability of this pharmacogenetic testing seems to be limited to a small number of individuals. In addition, the-163C>A variant is present in the CYP1A2*1F allele, but it is also presented in several other CYP1A2 haplotypes, two of which (CYP1A2* 1J and * 1M) were identified in the sample population. Therefore, it is informative to take the complete haplotypes into consideration when investigating associations of phenotype rather than focusing on single SNPs. After systematically screening the polymorphisms of the CYP1A2 gene in the healthy population of Chinese Tibetan subjects, three novel variants were detected that included one nonsynonymous change at position G795C in exon 2. These variants are rare but not absent, occurring in <1.04% of the population, but the current study is the first to report these variants in Chinese Tibetan subjects. Although the c.795 G>C variation is predicted to not have an affect on protein function by the SIFT or PolyPhen algorithms, further functional studies are still necessary to clarify the role of their clinical significance. It should be acknowledged that the current research was designed to investigate the unique distribution of the CYP1A2 alleles in the Tibetan population. The characterization of CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms among different races may contribute to the outcome and risks to certain drug therapies.
  23 in total

1.  Genotyping of four genetic polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene in the Egyptian population.

Authors:  Samar I Hamdy; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Kaori Narahara; Naomi Endo; Mervat El-Enany; Nadia Moursi; Mohammed S-E Ahmed; Michinao Mizugaki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Induction of CYP1A2 by heavy coffee consumption is associated with the CYP1A2 -163C>A polymorphism.

Authors:  Natasa Djordjevic; Roza Ghotbi; Slobodan Jankovic; Eleni Aklillu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Comparisons of CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms, enzyme activity and the genotype-phenotype relationship in Swedes and Koreans.

Authors:  Roza Ghotbi; Magnus Christensen; Hyung-Keun Roh; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; Eleni Aklillu; Leif Bertilsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Role of CYP1A2 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk in a prospective study.

Authors:  Sofia Pavanello; Ugo Fedeli; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Federica Rota; Kim Overvad; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Anne Tjønneland; Ulla Vogel
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012-06

5.  Influence of cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase genetic polymorphisms on CYP1A2 activity and inducibility by smoking.

Authors:  Maria Dobrinas; Jacques Cornuz; Leticia Pedrido; Chin B Eap
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Pharmacokinetics/genotype associations for major cytochrome P450 enzymes in native and first- and third-generation Japanese populations: comparison with Korean, Chinese, and Caucasian populations.

Authors:  S P Myrand; K Sekiguchi; M Z Man; X Lin; R-Y Tzeng; C-H Teng; B Hee; M Garrett; H Kikkawa; C-Y Lin; S M Eddy; J Dostalik; J Mount; J Azuma; Y Fujio; I-J Jang; S-G Shin; M R Bleavins; J A Williams; J D Paulauskis; K D Wilner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Genetic polymorphism of CYP1A2 in Ethiopians affecting induction and expression: characterization of novel haplotypes with single-nucleotide polymorphisms in intron 1.

Authors:  Eleni Aklillu; Juan Antonio Carrillo; Eyasu Makonnen; Karin Hellman; Marià Pitarque; Leif Bertilsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Influence of environmental and genetic factors on CYP1A2 activity in individuals of South Asian and European ancestry.

Authors:  V Perera; A S Gross; A J McLachlan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms and adenocarcinoma lung cancer risk in the Tunisian population.

Authors:  Fatma B'chir; Sofia Pavanello; Jalel Knani; Sami Boughattas; Maurice J Arnaud; Saâd Saguem
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 5.037

10.  Pathway-Targeted Pharmacogenomics of CYP1A2 in Human Liver.

Authors:  Kathrin Klein; Stefan Winter; Miia Turpeinen; Matthias Schwab; Ulrich M Zanger
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.810

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Essential Characteristics of Pharmacogenomics Study Publications.

Authors:  Caroline F Thorn; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Houda Hachad; Julie A Johnson; Ellen M McDonagh; Mark J Ratain; Mary V Relling; Stuart A Scott; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Clinical and genetic influencing factors on clozapine pharmacokinetics in Tunisian schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  Helmi Ammar; Zohra Chadli; Ahmed Mhalla; Sabria Khouadja; Ibtissem Hannachi; Mohammed Alshaikheid; Ahlem Slama; Nadia Ben Fredj; Najeh Ben Fadhel; Haifa Ben Romdhane; Amel Chaabane; Naceur A Boughattas; Lotfi Gaha; Lazhar Zarrouk; Karim Aouam
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Association of CYP19A1 and CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes mellitus risk in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Yafeng Yang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.