| Literature DB >> 28560290 |
Prue M Pereira-Fantini1, Susan Lapthorne1, Cormac G M Gahan2,3,4, Susan A Joyce2,5, Jenny Charles6, Peter J Fuller7, Julie E Bines1,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Options for the prevention of short-bowel syndrome-associated liver disease (SBS-ALDs) are limited and often ineffective. The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a newly emerging pharmaceutical target and FXR agonists have been shown to ameliorate cholestasis and metabolic disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of obeticholic acid (OCA) treatment in preventing SBS-ALDs.Entities:
Keywords: Bile Acids; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; FGF19, fibroblast growth factor-19; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; Farnesoid X Receptor; HCA, hyocholic acid; HDCA, hyodeoxycholic acid; Intestinal Failure–Associated Liver Disease; LCA, lithocholic acid; Liver Disease; OCA, obeticholic acid; Obeticholic Acid; SBS, short-bowel syndrome; SBS-ALD, short-bowel syndrome–associated liver disease; Short-Bowel Syndrome; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; UPLC, ultraperformance liquid chromatography
Year: 2017 PMID: 28560290 PMCID: PMC5439235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
List of Primer Sequences and Universal ProbeLibrary Probe Combinations Used in This Study
| Primer | Sequence 5’ to 3’ | UPL probe number |
|---|---|---|
| CYP7A1 forward | AGGGTGACGCCTTGAATTT | 46 |
| SHP (NR0B2) forward | AGTGCTGCCTGGAGTCCTTA | 50 |
| MRP2 (ABCC2) forward | TCTTGGTGACACACAGCATTC | 60 |
| BSEP (ABCB11) forward | GCCTGACCACGAGCATCT | 3 |
| OSTα (SLC51A) forward | CCTGTTTCTCATCCCTGACG | 3 |
| OSTβ (SLC51B) forward | CAGGAGCTGCTGGAAGAGAT | 37 |
| SULT2A1 forward | GCCTCATCAGTTCCCACCT | 60 |
| FGF19 forward | ACACCATCTGCCCGTCTCT | 13 |
| ILBP (FABP6) forward | GCAAGAAGTTCAAGGCCACT | 77 |
| HPRT1 forward | CAGTCAACGGGCGATATAAAA | 22 |
| RPL32 forward | AACTGGCCATCAGGGTCAC | 64 |
IL, ileal lipid; UPL, universal probelibrary.
Figure 1Clinical characteristics of untreated and OCA-treated sham and SBS piglets. (A) Portal OCA levels as measured by UPLC-MS, (B) weight gain, (C) stool consistency, and (D) stool fat score in untreated and OCA-treated sham and SBS piglets. Means ± SEM, **P < .01, ***P < .001. N = 5–6/group.
Figure 2OCA treatment exacerbated SBS-associated liver injury. (A) Histologic evidence of fat droplet accumulation was observed in H&E-stained liver sections of SBS piglets with granulated hepatocytes apparent in OCA-treated SBS piglets (block arrow; i–ii). (B) Fat droplet accumulation in SBS piglets was confirmed further by Oil Red O staining (i and ii). (C) OCA-treated SBS piglets also were observed to show evidence of lymphedema including swelling of the capsule, the development of capsule tags, loose connective tissue around portal structures, and swollen fibroblasts (indicated by arrows). Means ± SEM, *P < .05 and **P < .01. N = 5–6/group.
Figure 3SBS-associated alterations in bile acid composition were not prevented by OCA treatment. Concentration of taurine, unconjugated bile acid species, and conjugated bile acid species with (A) bile and (B) portal samples. Means ± SEM, *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. N = 5–6/group. BA, bile acid; CA, cholic acid.
Figure 4OCA treatment resulted in increased gene expression of FXR targets within the liver, but paradoxically a decrease in FXR target gene expression in the intestine of SBS piglets. The relative gene expression of FXR gene targets within the (A) liver and (B) intestine from untreated and OCA-treated sham and SBS piglets, and (C) portal FGF19 concentration. Means ± SEM, *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. N = 5–6/group. BA, bile acid.
Figure 5The potential influence of SBS-associated microbial dysbiosis on OCA efficacy within the intestine. BA, bile acid; CYP7A1, cytochrome P450 7A1.