| Literature DB >> 28560285 |
Daibing Zhou1,2, Lingyun Zhang1,2, Qunbo Lin1,2, Weimin Ren1,2, Guoxiong Xu1,2.
Abstract
Human epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological disease. However, the molecular mechanisms by which transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) regulates ovarian tumor progression markers remain unclear. The present data show cytidine monophosphate kinase (CMPK) as an EOC biomarker and are related to the article entitled "Cytidine monophosphate kinase is inhibited by the TGF-β signalling pathway through the upregulation of miR-130b-3p in human epithelial ovarian cancer" [1]. CMPK, as well as cystatin B [2] and β-2-microglobulin [3], is overexpressed in human epithelial-type ovarian tumors. CMPK is an enzyme required for nucleic acid biosynthesis [4] and is regulated by the TGF-β signaling pathway in EOC cells [1]. Furthermore, the data show the effect of CMPK-shRNA on EOC cell apoptosis and TGF-β-induced Smad2 phosphorylation. CMPK expression in two EOC cell lines OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3 is regulated by multiple miRNAs and some of these miRNAs may affect EOC chemoresistance [5].Entities:
Keywords: TGF-β signaling; Therapeutic target; Tissue microarray; Tumorigenesis; UMP/CMP kinase; miRNA
Year: 2017 PMID: 28560285 PMCID: PMC5443893 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Sequences of siRNA, shRNA, miRNA and PCR primer.
| Name | Sequence (5’ → 3’) | Target position |
|---|---|---|
| CMPK-siRNA | ||
| Sense | GAAAGAUUGUACCAGUUGAtt | nt 424–442 |
| Antisense | UCAACUGGUACAAUCUUUCtt | |
| NC-siRNA | ||
| Sense | UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT | Scramble |
| Antisense | ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT | |
| CMPK-shRNA | ||
| Sense | gatccGAAAGATTGTACCAGTTGAttcaagagaTCAACTGGTACAATCTTTCttttttg | nt 424–442 |
| Antisense | aattcaaaaaaGAAAGATTGTACCAGTTGAtctcttgaaTCAACTGGTACAATCTTTCg | |
| miR-130b-3p | ||
| miR-130b mimic | CAGUGCAAUGAUGAAAGGGCAU | nt 1824–1834 |
| miR-Ctrl | UCACAACCUCCUAGAAAGAGUAGA | |
| anti-miR-130b | AUGCCCUUUCAUCAUUGCACUG | nt 1824–1834 |
| anti-Ctrl | UCUACUCUUUCUAGGAGGUUGUGA | |
| CMPK PCR primer | ||
| Forward | TGTCAGCTCCCTCAGCGTC | nt 114–132 |
| Reverse | CGAGGACGAACACGACCAG | nt 255–273 |
| β-actin PCR primer | ||
| Forward | CATTGCCGACAGGATGCAG | nt 1008–1026 |
| Reverse | CTCGTCATACTCCTGCTTGCTG | nt 1155–1176 |
| miR-130b-3p primer | ||
| Forward | GGCAGTGCAATGATGAAAGG | |
| Reverse | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT | |
| U6 primer | ||
| Forward | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | |
| Reverse | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT | |
| miR-130b RT primer | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACatgccc | |
The target position in CMPK mRNA sequence (GenBank Accession: NM_016308) and β-actin mRNA sequence (GenBank Accession: NM_001101) is shown. Sequence in lowercase indicates a linker. NC, negative control; nt, nucleotide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; siRNA, small interfering RNA; shRNA, short hairpin RNA.
Association of CMPK protein expression with clinicopathological features of patients with epithelial ovarian tumours.
| Clinicopathological features | n | Total CMPK expression | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative (%) | |||
| Age | 0.221 | |||
| ≤45 | 26 | 11 (42.31) | 15 (57.69) | |
| >45 | 49 | 28 (57.14) | 21 (42.86) | |
| Histological type | ||||
| Serous tumour | 44 | 0.005 | ||
| Benign | 5 | 0 (00.00) | 5 (100.00) | |
| Borderline | 5 | 5 (100.00) | 0 (00.00) | |
| Malignant | 34 | 14 (41.18) | 20 (58.82) | |
| Mucinous tumour | 14 | 0.748 | ||
| Benign | 9 | 3 (33.33) | 6 (66.67) | |
| Borderline | 2 | 1 (50.00) | 1 (50.00) | |
| Malignant | 3 | 2 (66.67) | 1 (33.33) | |
| Endometrioid adenocarcinoma | 10 | 8 (80.00) | 2 (20.00) | |
| Transitional cell carcinoma | 4 | 4 (100.00) | 0 (00.00) | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 3 | 2 (66.67) | 1 (33.33) | |
| FIGO stage | 0.778 | |||
| I | 24 | 13 (54.17) | 11 (45.83) | |
| II | 10 | 6 (60.00) | 4 (40.00) | |
| III | 19 | 10 (52.62) | 9 (47.37) | |
| IV | 1 | 1 (100.00) | 0 (00.00) | |
The expression of CMPK was detected by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray. For comparison of CMPK expression associated with age, a χ2 test was applied
For multiple comparisons of CMPK expression associated with and histological types and clinical stages, a Fisher׳s exact test was applied.
n, number of cases; Positive, positive expression; Negative, negative expression; FIGO, International Federation of Gynaecological Oncologists. Normal ovarian tissues (n=19) showing a negation staining of CMPK are served as control.
Fig. 1Evaluation of positive rate for CMPK staining in tissue microassay. CMPK protein staining in subcellular localization was scored. Histogram shows the positive rate of CMPK staining in different tissues. A positive staining of CMPK was found in the cytoplasm and nucleus of ovarian tumor cells, whereas normal tissue appeared negative staining. Data are presented as mean. N, case number; Normal, normal ovarian tissue; Benign, benign tumor; Borderline, borderline tumor; Malignant, malignant tumor.
Fig. 2Knockdown of CMPK expression in EOC cells is confirmed by Western blot after siRNA transfection. OVCAR-3 (A, C) and SK-OV-3 (B, D) cells were transiently transfected with CMPK-siRNA (CMPK-siR) and negative control-siRNA (NC-siR), respectively. Untreated cells were used as blank control (Blank). (A, B) CMPK protein was detected by Western blot at 24 h post-transfection. (C, D) Histograms show semi-quantitative analysis after densitometry on the gels of (A) and (B), respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (N = 3). *P<0.05; **P<0.01 (CMPK-siRNA vs. Blank or NC-siR).
Fig. 3Doubling times (DT) based on the OD values at the time of measurement. (A) Histogram shows the DT (h, hour) of OVCAR-3 cells: Blank, 24.52±0.74; CTL, 23.91±0.82; NC, 30.07±3.02; CMPK-siR, 46.32±2.03. (B) Histogram shows the DT of SK-OV-3: Blank, 24.02±1.41; CTL, 25.06±2.06; NC, 26.19±1.64; CMPK-siR, 46.46±7.80. *P<0.05 (CMPK-siRNA group vs. other groups). Blank, control without transfection; CTL, reagent control, NC, negative control of transfection; CMPK-siR, CMPK-siRNA transfection.
Fig. 4Suppression of CMPK influences EOC cell apoptosis. OVCAR-3 cells were infected with CMPK-shRNA lentiviral particles or empty vector lentiviral particles. (A) The proportion of apoptotic cells of OVCAR-3 CMPK-shRNA expressing cells (CMPK-shRNA) and negative control cells (NC) was determined by flow cytometry. (B) Histogram shows the quantitative analysis of the percentage of early apoptotic cells from (A). (C) Cleaved caspase-3 and full sized caspase-3 proteins in NC and CMPK-shRNA cells were detected by Western blot. (D) Histogram shows the semi-quantitative analyses of the gels from (C) after densitometry (N = 3). Data are presented as mean±SEM. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 (CMPK-shRNA vs. NC).
Fig. 5Effect of CMPK-shRNA on TGF-β-induced Smad2 phosphorylation. (A) Expression of protein detected by Western blot. (B, C) Histogram shows the semi-quantitative analyses of pSmad2 in OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3 cells after densitometry in the gels from (A). Data are presented as mean±SEM. Different superscripts denote a significant difference from each other (P<0.05; N=3).
Fig. 6Effect of miRNAs on CMPK expression. CMPK protein expression was detected by Western blot. OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3 cells were transiently transfected with nine miRNA mimics. Negative control miRNA (miR-NC) was used as control. Experiment was repeated twice.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research article |