Literature DB >> 28560166

Small RNA-seq analysis in response to methyl jasmonate and abscisic acid treatment in Persicaria minor.

Nazaruddin Nazaruddin1,2, Abdul Fatah A Samad1, Muhammad Sajad3,4, Jaeyres Jani5, Zamri Zainal1, Ismanizan Ismail1,3.   

Abstract

Persicaria minor (Kesum) is an important medicinal plant with high level of secondary metabolite contents, especially, terpenoids and flavonoids. Previous studies have revealed that application of exogenous phytohormone could increase secondary metabolite contents of the plant. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small RNAs that play important regulatory roles in various biological processes. In order to explore the possible role of miRNA in the regulation of these phytohormones signaling pathway and uncovering their potential correlation, we, for the first time, have generated the smallRNA library of Kesum plant. The library was developed in response to methyl jasmonate (MJ) and abscisic acid (ABA) treatment by using next-generation sequencing technology. Raw reads have been deposited to SRA database with the accession numbers, SRX2655642 and SRX2655643 (MJ-treated), SRXSRX2655644 and SRX2655645 (ABA-treated) and SRX2655646and SRX2655647 (Control).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methyl jasmonate and abscisic acid; Persicaria minor; Small RNA sequencing; miRNA

Year:  2017        PMID: 28560166      PMCID: PMC5435574          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2017.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2655642; (MJ-treated). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2655643; (MJ-treated). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2655644; (ABA-treated). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2655645; (ABA-treated). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2655646; (Control). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2655647; (Control).

Experimental design, materials and methods

Plant materials

Persicaria minor plants were grown on an MS solid medium in a growth chamber at 25 ± 2 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness. Healthy, 45 day plants were selected for MJ and ABA elicitation, and leaves were sprayed with 100 μM of MJ and 100 μM of ABA, while the control plants were sprayed with distilled water. For MJ-treatment, leaves sample were harvested after 2 days (maximum gene expression was previosly reported after 2 days) [1], whereas; samples for ABA-treatment were harvested after 3 days. The harvested samples were blotted dry, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for further total RNA extraction.

Total RNA extraction, quality control, library preparation and small RNA-seq

Total RNA from leaf samples were extracted using Plant RNA purification reagent (Invitrogen, USA) based on manufacturer's protocol. Quantitation of extracted total RNA was carried out using Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) whereas, the integrity of was determined by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technology, USA), respectively. Total RNAs with a RIN value > 7 were selected for library construction. NEBNext® Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set for Illumina® (Set 1) Kit was used for library construction using the manufacturer's protocol. Two biological replicates were prepared for each treatment. The small-RNA samples were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Reads with 50 bp (single-end read) were generated for individual samples.

Raw reads processing, annotation and classification

CLC Genomic Workbench version 8 (https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/) was used to analyze the data. The analysis was carried out by removing adaptor and low quality sequences. The remaining sequences were filtered and the sequences between 18 bp to 30 bp were obtained (Table 1). The filtered sequences were considered for annotation. Firstly, the sequences were mapped against 73 plant species data from miRBase version 21 [2]. The sequences with no hit in the miRBase were used for further annotation against Rfam database (Table 2) for non-coding RNAs (tRNA, snoRNA, SnRNA, and rRNA) [3], [4]. The remaining sequences having no hit with the above databases were categorized as unannotated.
Table 1

Raw reads pre-analysis.

SRA IDTotal number of readsNumber of reads after trimmingDiscarded reads
SRX2655642 (MJ-treated)33,496,29219,094,70614,401,586
SRX2655643 (MJ-treated)47,378,86023,823,12723,555,733
SRX2655644 (ABA-treated)3,940,9412,459,7791,481,162
SRX2655645 (ABA-treated)30,566,19120,683,7629,882,429
SRX2655646 (Control)11,223,1896,609,3154,613,874
SRX2655647 (Control)26,046,62015,337,04610,709,574
Table 2

Raw reads annotation analysis.

SRA IDTotal number of sequence tagsAnnotation by miRBaseAnnotation by RfamUnannotated
SRX2655642 (MJ-treated)1,923,2352899110,8341,809,502
SRX2655643 (MJ-treated)2,403,18826461268,6912,271,792
SRX2655644 (ABA-treated)496,30623136,572459,503
SRX2655645 (ABA-treated)2,665,163845101,1412,563,177
SRX2655646 (Control)1,194,072154874,2741,118,250
SRX2655647 (Control)2,511,22170093,9752,416,546
Raw reads pre-analysis. Raw reads annotation analysis.

Differential miRNA expression analysis

The expression of miRNAs in treated and control libraries was compared. To proceed with the differential expression analysis, the first step in the statistical analysis was the normalization of the data to transcripts per million (TPM) which was done using criterion: TPM = (actual miRNA count/total count of clean reads) ∗ 1,000,000. After the data normalization, the fold change (Fold change = log2 (miRNA TPM in the treatment library/miRNA TPM in the control library) and p-value was calculated using Baggerly's test [5]. Finally, differentially expressed miRNAs were filtered using False Discovery Rates (FDR) ≤ 0.05 and the absolute value log2 ratio ≥ 1. Table 3 showed the number of miRNAs that significantly affected by both treatment.
Table 3

Differential miRNAs expression analysis.

TreatmentsTotal miRNAs significantly affectedNumber of miRNAs upregulatedNumber of miRNAs downregulated
MJ treatment30127328
ABA treatment33429
Differential miRNAs expression analysis.

Conflict of interest

All the authors have approved submission and there are no conflicts of interest.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissuePersicaria minor (leaf)
SexNot applicable
Sequencer or array typeIllumina HiSeqTM 2500 in Rapid Run mode
Data formatFASTQ
Experimental factorsMJ and ABA treatments
Experimental featuresControlled growth chamber set for 25 ± 2 °C with photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness
ConsentNot applicable
Sample source locationSelangor, Malaysia; GPS coordinates: (3° 16′14.63″ N, 101° 41′ 11.32″ E)
  5 in total

1.  Rfam: an RNA family database.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Alex Bateman; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation.

Authors:  Keith A Baggerly; Li Deng; Jeffrey S Morris; C Marcelo Aldaz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Transcriptome profiling of genes induced by salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate in Polygonum minus.

Authors:  Su-Fang Ee; Ji-Min Oh; Normah Mohd Noor; Taek-Ryoun Kwon; Zeti-Azura Mohamed-Hussein; Ismanizan Ismail; Zamri Zainal
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Rfam: updates to the RNA families database.

Authors:  Paul P Gardner; Jennifer Daub; John G Tate; Eric P Nawrocki; Diana L Kolbe; Stinus Lindgreen; Adam C Wilkinson; Robert D Finn; Sam Griffiths-Jones; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data.

Authors:  Ana Kozomara; Sam Griffiths-Jones
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.