| Literature DB >> 28559925 |
Zixin Lin1, Jiyong An1, Jia Wang1, Jun Niu2, Chao Ma1, Libing Wang3, Guanshen Yuan1, Lingling Shi1, Lili Liu1, Jinsong Zhang1, Zhixiang Zhang1, Ji Qi1, Shanzhi Lin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lindera glauca fruit with high quality and quantity of oil has emerged as a novel potential source of biodiesel in China, but the molecular regulatory mechanism of carbon flux and energy source for oil biosynthesis in developing fruits is still unknown. To better develop fruit oils of L. glauca as woody biodiesel, a combination of two different sequencing platforms (454 and Illumina) and qRT-PCR analysis was used to define a minimal reference transcriptome of developing L. glauca fruits, and to construct carbon and energy metabolic model for regulation of carbon partitioning and energy supply for FA biosynthesis and oil accumulation.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon flux and energy source; Differential expression profiles; Illumina and 454 sequencing; Lindera glauca fruits; Oil synthesis; Woody biodiesel
Year: 2017 PMID: 28559925 PMCID: PMC5445305 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0820-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Dynamic changes of oil accumulation and biodiesel fuel properties in developing L. glauca fruits. a The feature of L. glauca fruits from seven developmental stages. b The growth tendency of L. glauca fruits during development. c The oil contents of L. glauca fruits at different developing stages. d Changes in the fatty acid (FA) compositions during fruit development. e The relative proportion of monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, and saturated FAs in developing L. glauca fruits. f Prediction chart of FA composition on biodiesel properties. The gray part of the region was clearly delineated to predict the biodiesel fuel properties, taking into account the cetane number, iodine number, cold filter plugging point, and oxidation-stability requirements. Error bars are standard deviations (SDs) of three biological replicates
The changes of FA compositions and their relative proportions during fruit development of L. glauca
| DAF | C10:0 (%) | C12:0 (%) | C16:0 (%) | C16:1 (%) | C18:0 (%) | C18:1 (%) | C18:2 (%) | C18:3 (%) | C20:4 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 2.38 ± 0.14 | – | 21.02 ± 1.25 | – | 4.43 ± 0.43 | 21.79 ± 1.48 | 29.75 ± 1.55 | 7.16 ± 0.60 | 13.47 ± 1.12 |
| 50 | 3.57 ± 0.26 | 1.69 ± 0.11 | 21.61 ± 2.28 | – | 5.22 ± 0.40 | 22.19 ± 2.66 | 30.71 ± 2.10 | 6.21 ± 0.44 | 8.80 ± 1.26 |
| 75 | 13.49 ± 1.04 | 4.42 ± 0.29 | 21.23 ± 1.75 | – | 3.00 ± 0.19 | 33.78 ± 2.58 | 20.17 ± 1.30 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 2.95 ± 0.11 |
| 100 | 11.22 ± 1.43 | 8.20 ± 0.54 | 22.06 ± 1.85 | 1.01 ± 0.09 | 1.13 ± 0.08 | 39.26 ± 2.87 | 16.27 ± 0.68 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | – |
| 125 | 5.44 ± 0.78 | 5.71 ± 0.51 | 23.22 ± 2.82 | 3.63 ± 0.12 | 0.97 ± 0.08 | 43.83 ± 2.64 | 16.41 ± 0.52 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | – |
| 150 | 1.96 ± 0.90 | 5.70 ± 0.47 | 19.05 ± 1.81 | 4.57 ± 0.05 | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 49.92 ± 2.36 | 17.57 ± 0.99 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | – |
| 175 | 1.79 ± 0.83 | 5.67 ± 0.34 | 19.73 ± 2.92 | 5.54 ± 0.11 | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 48.22 ± 1.84 | 17.95 ± 0.94 | 0.63 ± 0.05 | – |
Error bars are standard deviations (SD) of three biological replicates
Fig. 2Temporal change analysis for ATP and pyridine nucleotide levels in developing L. glauca fruits. a ATP and ADP. b NADPH and NADP+. c NADH and NAD+. d The ratios of NADPH/NADP+, NADH/NAD+, ATP/ADP and ATP/NADPH. Error bars are SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) indicate that the differences between 25 DAF and other developing stages are statistically significant as determined by t test
Statistics of trimmed reads and unigenes of L.glauca fruits by different sequencing strategies
| Sequencing strategy and assembly | Trimmed reads | Unigenes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Mean length (bp) | Number | Mean length (bp) | |
| Illumina sequencing | ||||
| 50 DAF | 27,921,143 | 92.85 | 130,827 | 608.44 |
| 125 DAF | 29,036,556 | 92.63 | ||
| 150 DAF | 24,297,910 | 92.12 | ||
| 454 sequencing | 957,341 | 518.48 | 70,432 | 822.74 |
| Short- and long-read assembly | 60,031 | 1061.95 | ||
Three representative fruit samples from 50, 125 and 150 DAF and one mixed sample from seven different developing stages were selected for Illumina and 454 sequencing, respectively. The unigenes separately obtained from long read and short read (201,259 in total) was reconciled by TGICL software
Fig. 3Transcriptional expression analysis for enzymes involved in carbon assimilation and partitioning in developing L. glauca fruits by qRT-PCR. a Differential expressions for genes involved in carbon assimilation. b Differential transcript patterns for enzymes related to sucrose cleavage. c Comparative analysis of transcript levels for enzymes in both cytosolic and plastidial glycolysis. d Comparative analysis of transcript levels for enzymes in both cytosolic and plastidial OPPP. e Differential transcript profiles for alternative enzymes involved in acetyl-CoA generation. The genes encoding for large subunit ribosomal protein L32e and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UBC) were used as internal controls. The relative expression values in heatmap were counted as 2−△△Ct. The cytosolic (c), plastidial (p), or mitochondrial (m) isoforms of the enzymes are indicated by a prefix in c, d, or e, respectively
Fig. 4Transcriptional expression analysis of genes involved in energy mechanism in developing L. glauca fruits by qRT-PCR. a Temporal transcript patterns for enzymes in TCA cycle. b Temporal transcript patterns for enzymes involved in energy consumption during de novo FA synthesis. c Temporal transcript patterns of genes encoding for peripheral antenna proteins. d Temporal transcript changes for enzymes related to the Mal/OAA shuttle. e Temporal transcript patterns of genes involved in respiratory electron-transport chain. Both L32e and UBC genes were used as internal controls. The expression level from fruit sample at 25 DAF was arbitrarily set to 1.00 for standardization. Error bars are SDs of three technical replicates
Fig. 5Transcriptional profiles for transporters and transcription factors in developing L. glauca fruits by qRT-PCR. a Temporal transcript profiles for mitochondrial metabolite transporters involved in TCA cycle, respiration, and ATP synthesis. b Temporal transcript profiles for plastidial transporters involved in interchange of metabolites between cytosol and plastid. c Temporal transcript profiles for plastidial transporters involved in the transports of adenine nucleotide and inorganic phosphate. d Temporal transcript profiles for transcription factors involved in oil accumulation. Both L32e and UBC genes were used as the internal controls, and the expression level from fruit sample at 25 DAF was arbitrarily set to 1.00 for standardization. Error bars are SDs of three technical replicates
Fig. 6Transcriptional analysis for enzymes involved in TAG assembly in developing L. glauca fruits by qRT-PCR. Both L32e and UBC genes were used as the internal controls, and the expression level from fruit sample at 25 DAF was arbitrarily set to 1.00 for standardization. Error bars are SDs of three technical replicates
Fig. 7Characterization of central metabolic model in developing L. glauca fruits for the regulation of carbon partitioning and energy supply for oil synthesis. The identified metabolic routes of carbon flux allocation and energy provision for FA synthesis are based on the transcriptome data from Illumina and 454 sequencing, and temporal transcript pattern analysis by qRT-PCR. Purple arrows indicate carbon flux drains into oil synthesis, brown arrows represent the transports of metabolite and energy across intracellular membrane by specific transporters, and green curved arrows represent all reactions for generation and consumption of energy in FA biosynthetic pathway, oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (OPPP), glycolysis, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. All transporters and enzymes involved in carbon flux allocation and energy provision for FA synthesis are shown in red. Abbreviations for the enzymes, metabolites, and transporters are as follows: AAC ATP/ADP carrier, ACC acetyl-CoA carboxylase, ACLB ATP-citrate lyase subunit B, ACO aconitate hydratase, ADNT adenine nucleotide carrier, CS citrate synthase, DGAT diacylglycerol (DAG) acyltransferase, DIC dicarboxylate carrier, DTC dicarboxylate/tricarboxylate carrier, EAR enoyl-ACP reductase, ENO enolase, ER endoplasmic reticulum, FA fatty acid, FAD FA desaturase, FATA fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase A, FATB fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase B, FBA fructose-bisphosphate (F1,6P) aldolase, FK fructokinase, FUM fumarase, G6PDH glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) dehydrogenase, GAPA/C glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) dehydrogenase subunit A/C, GLT glycolipid transporter, GPAT G3P acyltransferase, GPI G6P isomerase, GPT G6P transporter, HXK hexokinase, IDH isocitrate dehydrogenase, INV invertase, KAR ketoacyl-ACP reductase, LACS long-chain acyl-CoA synthase, LPAAT lysoPA acyltransferases, LPCAT lysoPC acyltransferases, LSC succinyl-CoA synthetase, MDH malate (Mal) dehydrogenase, ME malic enzyme, NTT nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) transporter, OGDHC 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, 6PGDH 6-phosphogluconate (6PG) dehydrogenase, PA phosphatidic acid, PAP PA phosphohydrolases, PC phosphatidylcholine, PDAT DAG acyltransferase, PDC pyruvate (PYR) dehydrogenase complex, PEPC phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase, PFK ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase, PFP pyrophosphate phosphofructokinase, PGK phosphoglycerate kinase, PGLS 6-phosphogluconolactonase, PGM phosphoglycerate mutase, PHT phosphate (Pi) transporter, PK PYR kinase, PPT PEP transporter, PRK phosphoribulokinase, RBCS ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) small subunit, RPE ribulose-5-phosphate (Ru5P) epimerase, RPI ribose 5-phosphate isomerase, SDH succinate dehydrogenase, SUC sucrose transporter, SUS sucrose synthase, TA transaldolase, TAG triacylglycerol, TK transketolase, TPI triose phosphate isomerase, TPT triose phosphate transporters, UGP UDP-glucose (UDPG) pyrophosphorylase