| Literature DB >> 28559881 |
Guillaume Desoubeaux1,2,3, Carolyn Cray1.
Abstract
Invasive aspergillosis has been studied in laboratory by the means of plethora of distinct animal models. They were developed to address pathophysiology, therapy, diagnosis, or miscellaneous other concerns associated. However, there are great discrepancies regarding all the experimental variables of animal models, and a thorough focus on them is needed. This systematic review completed a comprehensive bibliographic analysis specifically-based on the technical features of rodent models infected with Aspergillus fumigatus. Out the 800 articles reviewed, it was shown that mice remained the preferred model (85.8% of the referenced reports), above rats (10.8%), and guinea pigs (3.8%). Three quarters of the models involved immunocompromised status, mainly by steroids (44.4%) and/or alkylating drugs (42.9%), but only 27.7% were reported to receive antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent from bacterial infection. Injection of spores (30.0%) and inhalation/deposition into respiratory airways (66.9%) were the most used routes for experimental inoculation. Overall, more than 230 distinct A. fumigatus strains were used in models. Of all the published studies, 18.4% did not mention usage of any diagnostic tool, like histopathology or mycological culture, to control correct implementation of the disease and to measure outcome. In light of these findings, a consensus discussion should be engaged to establish a minimum standardization, although this may not be consistently suitable for addressing all the specific aspects of invasive aspergillosis.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus; experimental infection; invasive aspergillosis; mice; rodent models
Year: 2017 PMID: 28559881 PMCID: PMC5432554 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1General overview of the pivotal study parameters that require to be considered when developing a rodent model of invasive aspergillosis caused by . This scheme is probably not exhaustive, but it outlines the major variables that are mostly thought to be critical for model development in laboratories. CFU, Colony-forming unit(s); PCR, Polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 2Flow chart of the bibliometric study. The research was completed in PubMed up to October 2016 according to the criteria reported in the Section Materials and Methods. Scientific reports, oral communications, and posters were not addressed in this study. N, Number; PD, Pharmacodynamics; PK, Pharmacokinetics. *Five articles reported the use of several rodent species at a time: two papers with mice plus rats simultaneously, and three with mice plus guinea pigs.
Figure 3Published articles . For this bar chart, have been only taken into account the articles about rodent models of invasive aspergillosis due to Aspergillus fumigatus retrieved in PubMed up to October 2016, according to the criteria reported in the Section Material and Methods.
Main general objectives for rodent models of invasive aspergillosis due to .
| ➢ Local or disseminated aspergillosis |
| ➢ Time lapse of clinical course |
| ➢ Clinical outcome |
| ➢ Animal handling |
| ➢ Animal housing |
| ➢ Animal sampling |
| ➢ Strain virulence and pathogenicity |
| ➢ Pathophysiology |
| ➢ Host immune response |
| ➢ Diagnostic tool(s) assessment |
| ➢ Imaging technology(-ies) assessment |
| ➢ Pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics/toxicology |
| ➢ Pre-clinical prophylactic assay(s) |
| ➢ Pre-clinical therapeutic assay(s) |
| ➢ Pre-clinical vaccine assay(s) |
This above listing is probably not exhaustive, but it outlines the goals that are mostly thought to be critical for rodent support development in laboratories.
Overall description of all the published rodent models of invasive aspergillosis due to .
| Weight (grams) | 21.7g (±3.8), [21.4–22.0 g] | 218.5 g (±71.1), [201.8–235.2 g] | 486.1 g (±36.9), [471.5–500.7 g] |
| Gender (male sex) | 277 | 43 | 22 (91.7%), [80.6–100.0%] |
| – Outbred | 201 (29.2%), [26.0–32.8%] | 56 (65.1%), [55.0–75.0%] | 20 (83.3%), [68.4–98.2%] |
| – Inbred | 459 (66.6%), [63.5–70.6%] | 24 (27.9%), [18.4–37.4%] | 4 (16.7%), [1.8–31.6%] |
| – Hybrid/Congenic | 18 (2.5%), [1.3–3.6%] | / | / |
| 529 (78.0%), [74.9–81.1%] | 67 (78.8%), [70.1–87.5%] | 19 (63.3%), [46.1–80.6%] | |
| – Alkylating drug(s) | 283 (41.9%), [38.2–45.6%] | 44 (51.8%), [41.1–62.4%] | 19 (63.3%), [46.1–80.6%] |
| – Steroid(s) | 299 (44.3%), [40.6–48.0%] | 43 (51.2%), [40.5–61.9%] | 15 (50.0%), [32.1–67.9%] |
| – Other immunosuppressive drug(s) | 30 (4.4%), [2.9–6.0%] | 1 (1.2%), [0.0–3.5%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| – Immunotherapy | 44 (6.5%), [4.6–8.4%] | / | / |
| – Irradiation | 21 (3.1%), [1.8–4.4%] | / | / |
| – Mutation(s)/deletion(s) in rodent genetic background | 124 (18.4%), [15.4–21.3%] | / | / |
| – Alternative method(s) | 3 (0.4%), [0.0–0.9%] | 1 (1.2%), [0.0–3.5%] | / |
| – AF293, ATCC MYA-4609, FA/1153, FGSC A1100, CBS 101355, NCPF 7367, IHEM18963 | 126 (19.5%), [16.4–22.5%] | 3 (3.8%), [0.0–7.9%] | 9 (30.0%), [13.6–46.4%] |
| – Dal/CEA10, CBS 144.89, D141, IHEM6963, NIH 4215, ATCC MYA-1163, AF10 | 56 (8.7%), [6.5–10.8%] | 3 (3.8%), [0.0–7.9%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| – 10AF/86/10/1, ATCC 90240 | 35 (5.4%), [3.7–7.1%] | / | / |
| – NIH 5233, ATCC 13073, B-5233, MF5668 | 53 (8.2%), [6.1–10.3%] | / | / |
| – AF216, IHEM 3372, B19119 | 2 (0.3%), [0.0–0.7%] | / | 9 (30.0%), [13.6–46.4%] |
| – H11-20 | 4 (0.6%), [0.0–0.5%] | 11 (13.8%), [6.2–21.3%] | / |
| – NCPF 2109, ATCC 46645 | 40 (6.2%), [4.3–8.0%] | 3 (3.8%), [0.0–7.9%] | / |
| – Ku80/CEA17, FGSC 1152, CEA10: | 32 (4.9%), [3.3–6.6%] | / | / |
| – KU80 | 17 (2.6%), [1.4–3.8%] | / | / |
| – CNM-CM-AF237, IHEM 5702 | 13 (2.0%), [0.9–3.1%] | / | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| – AfS35 | 11 (1.7%), [0.7–2.7%] | / | / |
| – AfS35 | 9 (1.4%), [0.5–2.3%] | / | / |
| – P171 | / | / | 5 (16.7%), [3.3–30.0%] |
| – Mutant strain(s) | 105 (16.1%), [13.2–18.9%] | 1 (1.3%), [0.0–3.7%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| – Local strain(s) | 104 (16.1%), [13.2–18.9%] | 37 (46.3%), [35.3–57.2%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| – Intravenous injection | 213 (31.4%), [27.9–34.9%] | 12 (14.6%), [7.0–22.3%] | 18 (60.0%), [42.5–77.6%] |
| 2.5 × 107 (±1.8 × 108), [0.0–5.1 × 107] | 1.4 × 107 (±1.1 × 107), [0.7–2.1 × 107] | 6.1 106 (±1.8 × 107), [0.0–1.5 × 107] | |
| – Intraperitoneal injection | 4 (0.6%), [0.0–1.2%] | 2 (2.4%), [0.0–5.8%] | / |
| 1.2 × 108 (±1.2 × 108), [0.0–4.0 × 108] | 8.3 × 106 (±9.4 × 106), [0.0–9.3 × 107] | ||
| – Intranasal deposition | 297 (43.7%), [40.0–47.5%] | 5 (6.1%), [0.9–11.3%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| 2.0 × 107 (±5.8 × 107), [1.3–2.6 × 107] | 7.2 × 106 (±8.4 × 106), [0.0–1.8 × 107] | 1.0 × 106 | |
| – Intra-tracheal/intra-bronchial instillation | 114 (16.8%), [14.0–19.6%] | 55 (67.1%), [56.9–77.2%] | 2 (6.7 %), [0.0–15.6%] |
| 2.2 × 107 (±3.9 × 107), [1.5–3.0 × 107] | 2.5 × 107 (±1.4 × 108), [0.0–6.1 × 107] | 5.1 × 107 (±7.0 × 107), [0.0–6.8 × 108] | |
| – Inhalation in chamber | 55 (8.1%), [6.0–10.2%] | 6 (7.3%), [1.7–13.0%] | 10 (33.3%), [16.5–50.2%] |
| 1.8 × 109 (±3.4 × 109), [0.8–2.7 × 109] | 6.3 × 108 (±4.3 × 108), [0.2–1.1 × 109] | 9.7 × 107 (±9.5 × 106), [0.9–1.0 × 108] | |
| – Intracerebral injection | 11 (1.6%), [0.7–2.6%] | 1 (1.2%), [0.0–3.3%] | / |
| 6.3 × 106 (±3.8 × 106), [3.6–9.0 × 106] | 6.7 × 106 (±7.4 × 106), [0.0–1.8 × 107] | ||
| – Intraocular injection / scraping | 15 (2.2%), [1.1–3.3%] | 4 (4.9%), [0.2–9.6%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| 1.8 × 106 (±5.3 × 106), [0.0–4.8 × 106] | 3.4 × 107 (±5.7 × 107), [0.0–1.8 × 108] | 2.0 × 104 | |
| – Other miscellaneous routes | 14 (2.0%), [1.0–3.1%] | 2 (2.4%), [0.0–5.8%] | / |
| 1.9 × 108 (±4.0 × 108), [0.0–4.6 × 108] | 6.3 × 106 (±1.5 × 106), [0.0–2.0 × 107] | ||
| 545 (79.6%), [76.5–85.6%] | 76 (88.4%), [81.6–95.1%] | 30 (100.0%), [100.0–100.0%] | |
| – Histopathology | 361 (53.2%), [49.5–57.0%] | 49 (57.0%), [46.5–67.4%] | 11 (33.7%), [19.4–53.9%] |
| – | 319 (47.1%), [43.3–50.8%] | 51 (59.3%), [48.9–69.7%] | 23 (76.7%), [61.5–91.8%] |
| – Galactomannan antigen measurement | 33 (4.9%), [3.2–6.5%] | 25 (29.1%), [19.5–38.7%] | 12 (40.0%), [22.5–57.5%] |
| – β-D-glucans measurement | 5 (0.7%), [0.1–1.4%] | 5 (5.8%), [0.9–10.8%] | 6 (20.0%), [5.7–34.3%] |
| – Polymerase chain reaction | 91 (13.4%), [10.9–16.0%] | 14 (16.3%), [8.5–24.1%] | 7 (23.3%), [8.2–38.5%] |
| – Chitin assay | 34 (5.0%), [3.4–6.6%] | 4 (4.7%), [0.2–9.1%] | 1 (3.3%), [0.0–9.8%] |
| – Other surrogate biomarker(s) | 3 (0.4%), [0.0–0.9%] | 2 (2.3%), [0.0–5.5%] | / |
CFU, Colony-forming unit(s); g, grams; /, 0 (0.0%), (0.0–0.0%).
31 studies used both males and females.
One study encompassed males and females.
Associations are possible.
Non-exhaustive listing; when do exist, synonym strain names are provided on the same line.
Key-issues of pivotal study parameters are displayed in this table, except when not available in some of the retained articles. Among the 800 articles, five reported the use of several rodent species at a time: two with mice plus rats, and three with mice plus guinea pigs.
Figure 4Summary of recommendations for further studies involving animal models of invasive aspergillosis. Suggestions for standardization are based on objective analysis of all the published literature faced with the authors' personal experience. In light of all the benefits due to their small size, their costs and the large availability of reagents dedicated to, mice should be privileged. Within a 1–2 week-long period, immunocompromised status is easily achieved by repeated injections of low-cost drugs, like alkylating agents or steroids. Thereafter, a tracheo-pulmonary challenge is recommended by non-invasive device, like MicroSprayer® aerosolizer, allowing accurate control of the fungal inoculum. In such a context, no more than 107 A. fumigatus conidia are usually needed to yield 90–100% infection rates. Generally, onset of clinical signs occurs within 48–72 h after the experimental inoculation. After that time, the challenged animals start becoming moribund from aspergillosis (ruffled fur, decreased defecation, lethargy, anorexia, weight loss, ataxia, various pulmonary signs, gross bleeding …). Although death remains the major clinical outcome, primarily in therapeutic assays, alternative endpoints may be assessed to estimate the fungal load while refining the animal welfare: nowadays, galactomannan antigen determination in blood and histopathology in lungs appear reliable and largely validated, in comparison with other surrogate biomarkers. *For therapeutic assays: outbred mouse strains like Albino Swiss Webster and CD-1; for pharmacology-pharmacokinetics and toxicology studies: outbred mouse strains like Swiss OF1 and NMRI; for immuno-pathophysiology: inbred mouse strains like C57BL/6, BALB/c, DBA2, 129/Sv, and CD2F1; for general purposes: C57BL/6 and BALB/c. #Referenced A. fumigatus strains should be privileged for inoculation, especially those that have been widely used so far, like AF293 and Dal/CEA10. Otherwise, it makes sense to use strains that were initially isolated in a relevant context of invasive aspergillosis. Environmental strains or local unreferenced strains should be avoided, because they don't allow large-scale reliable comparison. biw, Twice a week; D, Day (D0 being the date of experimental challenge); GMS, Grocott-Gomori methenamine silver staining; IP, Intraperitoneal; ♂, Male; sc, Subcutanous; tiw, Thrice a week.