Y Zhou1, D Simmons2,3, D Lai4, B D Hambly5, C S McLachlan1. 1. Rural Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Rural Clinical School, University of MelbourneI, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia. 3. School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. School of Medical Sciences and Bosch Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Discipline of Pathology and Bosch Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fat mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) gene influences energy homeostasis in humans. Although the obesity-related variant, rs9939609 has been replicated across a number of cohort studies, there remains significant variance and a low to modest association. Telomere length is another commonly reported obesity risk factor. We hypothesize understanding the associations between FTO rs9939609 with FTO methylation and telomere length will provide a more accurate assessment of obesity risk. METHODS: Overall, 942 participants free of diabetes or pre-diabetes were included in the retrospective study. Leukocyte genomic DNA was analyzed for rs9939609 genotyping, FTO gene methylation and leukocyte telomere length (LTL) measurement. RESULTS: In general linear models, rs9939609 AA genotypes were associated with increased fat percentage (3.15%, P=0.001), fat mass (4.16 kg, P=0.001), body mass index (BMI) (1.38, P=0.006) and waist circumference (3.35 cm, P=0.006), but not with FTO methylation or LTL in this overall population. However, when participants were stratified into higher and lower FTO methylation groups, the AA genotype possesses a 2.04-fold increased obesity risk in comparison to TT genotype (95%CI, 1.07-3.89, P=0.031) in participants with a higher FTO methylation level, but this association was absent in the lower FTO methylation sub-group. Moreover, AT and AA genotype carriers were associated with shorter LTL compared to TT carriers (P=0.020 and P=0.111, respectively) in the higher FTO methylation level group. However, this association was absent in the lower methylation group. Furthermore, FTO gene methylation level was significantly associated with LTL in the 942 samples (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: FTO rs9939609 is associated with obesity risk and LTL in this study, where this association is only observed at higher, but not lower, FTO methylation levels of participants. Our data suggest association of multiple factors, including FTO methylation level, may be involved in one of several mechanisms underlying the commonly reported obesity risk of this FTO polymorphism.
BACKGROUND: The fat mass- and obesity-associated (FTO) gene influences energy homeostasis in humans. Although the obesity-related variant, rs9939609 has been replicated across a number of cohort studies, there remains significant variance and a low to modest association. Telomere length is another commonly reported obesity risk factor. We hypothesize understanding the associations between FTOrs9939609 with FTO methylation and telomere length will provide a more accurate assessment of obesity risk. METHODS: Overall, 942 participants free of diabetes or pre-diabetes were included in the retrospective study. Leukocyte genomic DNA was analyzed for rs9939609 genotyping, FTO gene methylation and leukocyte telomere length (LTL) measurement. RESULTS: In general linear models, rs9939609 AA genotypes were associated with increased fat percentage (3.15%, P=0.001), fat mass (4.16 kg, P=0.001), body mass index (BMI) (1.38, P=0.006) and waist circumference (3.35 cm, P=0.006), but not with FTO methylation or LTL in this overall population. However, when participants were stratified into higher and lower FTO methylation groups, the AA genotype possesses a 2.04-fold increased obesity risk in comparison to TT genotype (95%CI, 1.07-3.89, P=0.031) in participants with a higher FTO methylation level, but this association was absent in the lower FTO methylation sub-group. Moreover, AT and AA genotype carriers were associated with shorter LTL compared to TT carriers (P=0.020 and P=0.111, respectively) in the higher FTO methylation level group. However, this association was absent in the lower methylation group. Furthermore, FTO gene methylation level was significantly associated with LTL in the 942 samples (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS:FTOrs9939609 is associated with obesity risk and LTL in this study, where this association is only observed at higher, but not lower, FTO methylation levels of participants. Our data suggest association of multiple factors, including FTO methylation level, may be involved in one of several mechanisms underlying the commonly reported obesity risk of this FTO polymorphism.
Authors: Klelia D Salpea; Philippa J Talmud; Jackie A Cooper; Cecilia G Maubaret; Jeffrey W Stephens; Kavin Abelak; Steve E Humphries Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Fides D Lay; Yaping Liu; Theresa K Kelly; Heather Witt; Peggy J Farnham; Peter A Jones; Benjamin P Berman Journal: Genome Res Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jeremy B M Jowett; Joanne E Curran; Matthew P Johnson; Melanie A Carless; Harald H H Göring; Thomas D Dyer; Shelley A Cole; Anthony G Comuzzie; Jean W MacCluer; Eric K Moses; John Blangero Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Christian Dina; David Meyre; Sophie Gallina; Emmanuelle Durand; Antje Körner; Peter Jacobson; Lena M S Carlsson; Wieland Kiess; Vincent Vatin; Cecile Lecoeur; Jérome Delplanque; Emmanuel Vaillant; François Pattou; Juan Ruiz; Jacques Weill; Claire Levy-Marchal; Fritz Horber; Natascha Potoczna; Serge Hercberg; Catherine Le Stunff; Pierre Bougnères; Peter Kovacs; Michel Marre; Beverley Balkau; Stéphane Cauchi; Jean-Claude Chèvre; Philippe Froguel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-05-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Angelo Scuteri; Serena Sanna; Wei-Min Chen; Manuela Uda; Giuseppe Albai; James Strait; Samer Najjar; Ramaiah Nagaraja; Marco Orrú; Gianluca Usala; Mariano Dei; Sandra Lai; Andrea Maschio; Fabio Busonero; Antonella Mulas; Georg B Ehret; Ashley A Fink; Alan B Weder; Richard S Cooper; Pilar Galan; Aravinda Chakravarti; David Schlessinger; Antonio Cao; Edward Lakatta; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Ji Hee Yu; Inkyung Baik; Hyun Joo Cho; Ji A Seo; Sin Gon Kim; Kyung Mook Choi; Sei Hyun Baik; Dong Seop Choi; Chol Shin; Nan Hee Kim Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Jose Vladimir Sandoval-Sierra; Alexandra H B Helbing; Evan G Williams; David G Ashbrook; Suheeta Roy; Robert W Williams; Khyobeni Mozhui Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 9.304