Charles E Murphy1, Ali S Raja2, Brigitte M Baumann3, Anthony J Medak4, Mark I Langdorf5, Daniel K Nishijima6, Gregory W Hendey7, William R Mower8, Robert M Rodriguez9. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: robert.rodriguez@emergency.ucsf.edu.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: With increased use of chest computed tomography (CT) in trauma evaluation, traditional teachings in regard to rib fracture morbidity and mortality may no longer be accurate. We seek to determine rates of rib fracture observed on chest CT only; admission and mortality of patients with isolated rib fractures, rib fractures observed on CT only, and first or second rib fractures; and first or second rib fracture-associated great vessel injury. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of 2 prospectively enrolled cohorts of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study chest studies, which evaluated patients with blunt trauma who were older than 14 years and received chest imaging in the emergency department. We defined rib fractures and other thoracic injuries according to CT reports and followed patients through their hospital course to determine outcomes. RESULTS: Of 8,661 patients who had both chest radiograph and chest CT, 2,071 (23.9%) had rib fractures, and rib fractures were observed on chest CT only in 1,368 cases (66.1%). Rib fracture patients had higher admission rates (88.7% versus 45.8%; mean difference 42.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 41.4% to 44.4%) and mortality (5.6% versus 2.7%; mean difference 2.9%; 95% CI 1.8% to 4.0%) than patients without rib fracture. The mortality of patients with rib fracture observed on chest CT only was not statistically significantly different from that of patients with fractures also observed on chest radiograph (4.8% versus 5.7%; mean difference -0.9%; 95% CI -3.1% to 1.1%). Patients with first or second rib fractures had significantly higher mortality (7.4% versus 4.1%; mean difference 3.3%; 95% CI 0.2% to 7.1%) and prevalence of concomitant great vessel injury (2.8% versus 0.6%; mean difference 2.2%; 95% CI 0.6% to 4.9%) than patients with fractures of ribs 3 to 12, and the odds ratio of great vessel injury with first or second rib fracture was 4.4 (95% CI 1.8 to 10.4). CONCLUSION: Under trauma imaging protocols that commonly incorporate chest CT, two thirds of rib fractures were observed on chest CT only. Patients with rib fractures had higher admission rates and mortality than those without rib fractures. First or second rib fractures were associated with significantly higher mortality and great vessel injury.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: With increased use of chest computed tomography (CT) in trauma evaluation, traditional teachings in regard to rib fracture morbidity and mortality may no longer be accurate. We seek to determine rates of rib fracture observed on chest CT only; admission and mortality of patients with isolated rib fractures, rib fractures observed on CT only, and first or second rib fractures; and first or second rib fracture-associated great vessel injury. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of 2 prospectively enrolled cohorts of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study chest studies, which evaluated patients with blunt trauma who were older than 14 years and received chest imaging in the emergency department. We defined rib fractures and other thoracic injuries according to CT reports and followed patients through their hospital course to determine outcomes. RESULTS: Of 8,661 patients who had both chest radiograph and chest CT, 2,071 (23.9%) had rib fractures, and rib fractures were observed on chest CT only in 1,368 cases (66.1%). Rib fracturepatients had higher admission rates (88.7% versus 45.8%; mean difference 42.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 41.4% to 44.4%) and mortality (5.6% versus 2.7%; mean difference 2.9%; 95% CI 1.8% to 4.0%) than patients without rib fracture. The mortality of patients with rib fracture observed on chest CT only was not statistically significantly different from that of patients with fractures also observed on chest radiograph (4.8% versus 5.7%; mean difference -0.9%; 95% CI -3.1% to 1.1%). Patients with first or second rib fractures had significantly higher mortality (7.4% versus 4.1%; mean difference 3.3%; 95% CI 0.2% to 7.1%) and prevalence of concomitant great vessel injury (2.8% versus 0.6%; mean difference 2.2%; 95% CI 0.6% to 4.9%) than patients with fractures of ribs 3 to 12, and the odds ratio of great vessel injury with first or second rib fracture was 4.4 (95% CI 1.8 to 10.4). CONCLUSION: Under trauma imaging protocols that commonly incorporate chest CT, two thirds of rib fractures were observed on chest CT only. Patients with rib fractures had higher admission rates and mortality than those without rib fractures. First or second rib fractures were associated with significantly higher mortality and great vessel injury.
Authors: Ties L Janssen; Elmand Hosseinzoi; Dagmar I Vos; Eelco J Veen; Paul G H Mulder; Adrianus M van der Holst; Lijckle van der Laan Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2019-06-13
Authors: Nadia Hernandez; Johanna de Haan; Dallis Clendeninn; David E Meyer; Semhar Ghebremichael; Carlos Artime; George Williams; Holger Eltzschig; Sudipta Sen Journal: Local Reg Anesth Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Thomas Weikert; Luca Andre Noordtzij; Jens Bremerich; Bram Stieltjes; Victor Parmar; Joshy Cyriac; Gregor Sommer; Alexander Walter Sauter Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Gregory J Roberts; Lewis E Jacobson; Michelle M Amaral; Courtney D Jensen; Louis Cooke; Jacqueline F Schultz; Alexander J Kinstedt; Jonathan M Saxe Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: J T H Prins; E M M Van Lieshout; M R L Reijnders; M H J Verhofstad; M M E Wijffels Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jonne T H Prins; Mathieu M E Wijffels; Sophie M Wooldrik; Martien J M Panneman; Michael H J Verhofstad; Esther M M Van Lieshout Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 2.374