Yvonne M Terry-McElrath1, Patrick M O'Malley2, Megan E Patrick2, Richard A Miech2. 1. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA. Electronic address: yterry@umich.edu. 2. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perceived risk of harm has long been a key preventive factor for adolescent marijuana use. However, in recent years, perceived risk has decreased markedly and marijuana use has increased only slightly, leading to new questions about their association. This study investigates the magnitude and stability of the US adolescent marijuana risk/use association from 1991 to 2016, overall and by gender and race/ethnicity. METHODS: Self-reported data on past 12-month marijuana use, perceived risk of regular marijuana use, gender, and race/ethnicity were obtained from 275,768 US 12th grade students participating in the nationally representative Monitoring the Future study. Time-varying effect modeling (TVEM) was used to examine the marijuana risk/use association over time. RESULTS: Both before and after controlling for gender and race/ethnicity, perceived risk was a strong protective factor against adolescent marijuana use. The magnitude of the great risk/use association strengthened for Hispanic students; remained generally stable over time for 12th graders overall, males, females, and White students; and weakened for Black students. The magnitude of the moderate risk/use association strengthened for 12th graders overall, males, females, White and Hispanic students, but did not continue to strengthen for Black students from 2005 onwards. In general, marijuana use prevalence decreased over time within all levels of perceived risk. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived risk remains a strong protective factor for adolescent marijuana use, and the protective association for moderate risk (vs. no/slight risk) is actually increasing over time. Results suggest that accurate and credible information on the risks associated with marijuana use should remain a key component of prevention efforts.
BACKGROUND: Perceived risk of harm has long been a key preventive factor for adolescent marijuana use. However, in recent years, perceived risk has decreased markedly and marijuana use has increased only slightly, leading to new questions about their association. This study investigates the magnitude and stability of the US adolescent marijuana risk/use association from 1991 to 2016, overall and by gender and race/ethnicity. METHODS: Self-reported data on past 12-month marijuana use, perceived risk of regular marijuana use, gender, and race/ethnicity were obtained from 275,768 US 12th grade students participating in the nationally representative Monitoring the Future study. Time-varying effect modeling (TVEM) was used to examine the marijuana risk/use association over time. RESULTS: Both before and after controlling for gender and race/ethnicity, perceived risk was a strong protective factor against adolescent marijuana use. The magnitude of the great risk/use association strengthened for Hispanic students; remained generally stable over time for 12th graders overall, males, females, and White students; and weakened for Black students. The magnitude of the moderate risk/use association strengthened for 12th graders overall, males, females, White and Hispanic students, but did not continue to strengthen for Black students from 2005 onwards. In general, marijuana use prevalence decreased over time within all levels of perceived risk. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived risk remains a strong protective factor for adolescent marijuana use, and the protective association for moderate risk (vs. no/slight risk) is actually increasing over time. Results suggest that accurate and credible information on the risks associated with marijuana use should remain a key component of prevention efforts.
Authors: Renee M Johnson; Brian Fairman; Tamika Gilreath; Ziming Xuan; Emily F Rothman; Taylor Parnham; C Debra M Furr-Holden Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Tulshi D Saha; Bradley T Kerridge; Risë B Goldstein; S Patricia Chou; Haitao Zhang; Jeesun Jung; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Bridget F Grant Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Julia P Schleimer; Ariadne E Rivera-Aguirre; Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia; Hannah S Laqueur; Kara E Rudolph; Héctor Suárez; Jessica Ramírez; Nora Cadenas; Matías Somoza; Maria V Brasesco; Silvia S Martins; Magdalena Cerdá Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ashley Brooks-Russell; Ming Ma; Arnold H Levinson; Leo Kattari; Tom Kirchner; Erin M Anderson Goodell; Renee M Johnson Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2019-02
Authors: Lisa A Marsch; Sarah K Moore; Michael Grabinski; Sarah Y Bessen; Jacob Borodovsky; Emily Scherer Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2021-02-25