Literature DB >> 28558281

Optimization of sulfate removal from brackish water by membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI).

Wangwang Tang1, Di He2, Changyong Zhang1, T David Waite3.   

Abstract

Removal of sulfate from water is an environmental challenge faced by many industrial sectors as most existing options are inefficient, costly or unsustainable. The situation is further complicated by the typical coexistence of other ions. In this work, the feasibility of sulfate removal from brackish water by single-pass constant-current membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) under reverse-current desorption was investigated. Results revealed that sulfate is preferentially removed from the aqueous solution by MCDI compared to chloride. Equivalent circuits of the MCDI system during adsorption and desorption were proposed and the dynamic variation of cell voltage and charging voltage at different adsorption currents was satisfactorily elucidated. Optimization studies were conducted with attention given to discussing the effects of four operating parameters, i.e., adsorption current, pump flow rate, ending cell voltage and desorption current, on three performance indicators (i.e., water recovery, energy consumption and sorption ratio of sulfate to chloride) on the premise of maintaining the effluent sulfate concentration below the specified threshold of 300 mg L-1. Water recovery-energy consumption mapping and sorption ratio of sulfate to chloride-energy consumption mapping indicated that the combination of a lower adsorption current and a lower matching pump flow rate which reduced the effluent sulfate concentration to 300 mg L-1 was more favorable in practical applications. An appropriately small ending cell voltage was advantageous while a trade-off between water recovery and energy cost was required in optimizing the desorption current.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy consumption; Membrane capacitive deionization; Preferential adsorption; Process optimization; Sulfate removal; Water recovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28558281     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical Methods for Water Purification, Ion Separations, and Energy Conversion.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alkhadra; Xiao Su; Matthew E Suss; Huanhuan Tian; Eric N Guyes; Amit N Shocron; Kameron M Conforti; J Pedro de Souza; Nayeong Kim; Michele Tedesco; Khoiruddin Khoiruddin; I Gede Wenten; Juan G Santiago; T Alan Hatton; Martin Z Bazant
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 2.  Towards Electrochemical Water Desalination Techniques: A Review on Capacitive Deionization, Membrane Capacitive Deionization and Flow Capacitive Deionization.

Authors:  Gbenro Folaranmi; Mikhael Bechelany; Philippe Sistat; Marc Cretin; Francois Zaviska
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-12

3.  Predicting and Enhancing the Ion Selectivity in Multi-Ion Capacitive Deionization.

Authors:  Johan Nordstrand; Joydeep Dutta
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Langmuir-Based Modeling Produces Steady Two-Dimensional Simulations of Capacitive Deionization via Relaxed Adsorption-Flow Coupling.

Authors:  Johan Nordstrand; Joydeep Dutta
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  Simplified Prediction of Ion Removal in Capacitive Deionization of Multi-Ion Solutions.

Authors:  Johan Nordstrand; Joydeep Dutta
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.882

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.