Literature DB >> 28557736

Change of School Playground Environment on Bullying: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Victoria L Farmer1, Sheila M Williams2, Jim I Mann1,3, Grant Schofield4, Julia C McPhee4, Rachael W Taylor5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether increasing risk and challenge in primary school playgrounds influences interactions between children.
METHODS: In a 2-year cluster-randomized controlled trial, 8 control schools were asked to not change their play environment, whereas 8 intervention schools increased opportunities for risk and challenge (eg, rough-and-tumble play), reduced rules, and added loose parts (eg, tires). Children (n = 840), parents (n = 635), and teachers (n = 90) completed bullying questionnaires at baseline, 1 (postintervention), and 2 (follow-up) years.
RESULTS: Intervention children reported higher odds of being happy at school (at 2 years, odds ratio [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.25) and playing with more children (at 1 year, OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.29-2.15) than control children. Although intervention children indicated they were pushed/shoved more (OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03-1.71), they were less likely to tell a teacher (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.92) at 2 years. No significant group differences were observed in parents reporting whether children had "ever" been bullied at school (1 year: P = .23; 2 years: P = .07). Intervention school teachers noticed more bullying in break time at 1 year (difference in scores: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06-0.34; P = .009), with no corresponding increase in children reporting bullying to teachers (both time points, P ≥ .26).
CONCLUSIONS: Few negative outcomes were reported by children or parents, except for greater pushing/shoving in intervention schools. Whether this indicates increased resilience as indicated by lower reporting of bullying to teachers may be an unanticipated benefit.
Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28557736     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-3072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of School Anti-Bullying Interventions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  David Fraguas; Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja; Miriam Ayora; Manuel Durán-Cutilla; Renzo Abregú-Crespo; Iciar Ezquiaga-Bravo; Javier Martín-Babarro; Celso Arango
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  The association between chronic bullying victimization with weight status and body self-image: a cross-national study in 39 countries.

Authors:  Qiguo Lian; Qiru Su; Ruili Li; Frank J Elgar; Zhihao Liu; Dongpeng Zheng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Research into the Impact of Loose Parts Play on Children's Cognitive, Social and Emotional Development.

Authors:  Jenny Louise Gibson; Megan Cornell; Tim Gill
Journal:  School Ment Health       Date:  2017-07-31

4.  A stepped-wedge implementation and evaluation of the healthy active peaceful playgrounds for youth (HAPPY) intervention.

Authors:  Dean Dudley; Wayne Cotton; Louisa Peralta; Matthew Winslade
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  "Children are precious cargo; we don't let them take any risks!": Hearing from adults on safety and risk in children's active play in schools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alethea Jerebine; Katie Fitton-Davies; Natalie Lander; Emma L J Eyre; Michael J Duncan; Lisa M Barnett
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 8.915

6.  Educator perceptions on the benefits and challenges of loose parts play in the outdoor environments of childcare centres.

Authors:  Rebecca A Spencer; Nila Joshi; Karina Branje; Jessie-Lee D McIsaac; Jane Cawley; Laurene Rehman; Sara Fl Kirk; Michelle Stone
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.