Literature DB >> 28557693

Magnocellular Bias in Exogenous Attention to Biologically Salient Stimuli as Revealed by Manipulating Their Luminosity and Color.

Luis Carretié1, Dominique Kessel1, María J García-Rubio1, Tamara Giménez-Fernández1, Sandra Hoyos2, María Hernández-Lorca1.   

Abstract

Exogenous attention is a set of mechanisms that allow us to detect and reorient toward salient events-such as appetitive or aversive-that appear out of the current focus of attention. The nature of these mechanisms, particularly the involvement of the parvocellular and magnocellular visual processing systems, was explored. Thirty-four participants performed a demanding digit categorization task while salient (spiders or S) and neutral (wheels or W) stimuli were presented as distractors under two figure-ground formats: heterochromatic/isoluminant (exclusively processed by the parvocellular system, Par trials) and isochromatic/heteroluminant (preferentially processed by the magnocellular system, Mag trials). This resulted in four conditions: SPar, SMag, WPar, and WMag. Behavioral (RTs and error rates in the task) and electrophysiological (ERPs) indices of exogenous attention were analyzed. Behavior showed greater attentional capture by SMag than by SPar distractors and enhanced modulation of SMag capture as fear of spiders reported by participants increased. ERPs reflected a sequence from magnocellular dominant (P1p, ≃120 msec) to both magnocellular and parvocellular processing (N2p and P2a, ≃200 msec). Importantly, amplitudes in one N2p subcomponent were greater to SMag than to SPar and WMag distractors, indicating greater magnocellular sensitivity to saliency. Taking together, results support a magnocellular bias in exogenous attention toward distractors of any nature during initial processing, a bias that remains in later stages when biologically salient distractors are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28557693     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Exogenous Attention to Emotional Stimuli Presenting Realistic (3D) Looming Motion.

Authors:  Uxía Fernández-Folgueiras; María Hernández-Lorca; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Fátima Álvarez; Tamara Giménez-Fernández; Luis Carretié
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.275

2.  The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load.

Authors:  Andras N Zsidó; Diana T Stecina; Rebecca Cseh; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-11-12

3.  Does Threat Have an Advantage After All? - Proposing a Novel Experimental Design to Investigate the Advantages of Threat-Relevant Cues in Visual Processing.

Authors:  Andras N Zsido; Arpad Csatho; Andras Matuz; Diana Stecina; Akos Arato; Orsolya Inhof; Gergely Darnai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-27

4.  Magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contributions to facial threat cue processing.

Authors:  Cody A Cushing; Hee Yeon Im; Reginald B Adams; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Suppression of alpha-band power underlies exogenous attention to emotional distractors.

Authors:  Lydia Arana; María Melcón; Dominique Kessel; Sandra Hoyos; Jacobo Albert; Luis Carretié; Almudena Capilla
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  Retinotopy of emotion: Perception of negatively valenced stimuli presented at different spatial locations as revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Cristina Bódalo; María Hernández-Lorca; Uxía Fernández-Folgueiras; Sabela Fondevila; Tamara Giménez-Fernández
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.